Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savan...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Gimonneau Geoffrey [verfasserIn] Pombi Marco [verfasserIn] Dabiré Roch K [verfasserIn] Diabaté Abdoulaye [verfasserIn] Morand Serge [verfasserIn] Simard Frédéric [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2012 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Parasites & Vectors - BMC, 2008, 5(2012), 1, p 65 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:5 ; year:2012 ; number:1, p 65 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ07697961X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ07697961X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309145855.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ07697961X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RC109-216 | |
100 | 0 | |a Gimonneau Geoffrey |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< | ||
653 | 0 | |a Infectious and parasitic diseases | |
700 | 0 | |a Pombi Marco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Dabiré Roch K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Diabaté Abdoulaye |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Morand Serge |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Simard Frédéric |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Parasites & Vectors |d BMC, 2008 |g 5(2012), 1, p 65 |w (DE-627)558690076 |w (DE-600)2409480-8 |x 17563305 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2012 |g number:1, p 65 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 5 |j 2012 |e 1, p 65 |
author_variant |
g g gg p m pm d r k drk d a da m s ms s f sf |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:17563305:2012----::eaiuarsossftnpeegmietessrcoadmlclromaveo |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RC |
publishDate |
2012 |
allfields |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 doi (DE-627)DOAJ07697961X (DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC109-216 Gimonneau Geoffrey verfasserin aut Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< Infectious and parasitic diseases Pombi Marco verfasserin aut Dabiré Roch K verfasserin aut Diabaté Abdoulaye verfasserin aut Morand Serge verfasserin aut Simard Frédéric verfasserin aut In Parasites & Vectors BMC, 2008 5(2012), 1, p 65 (DE-627)558690076 (DE-600)2409480-8 17563305 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:1, p 65 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 kostenfrei http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 1, p 65 |
spelling |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 doi (DE-627)DOAJ07697961X (DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC109-216 Gimonneau Geoffrey verfasserin aut Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< Infectious and parasitic diseases Pombi Marco verfasserin aut Dabiré Roch K verfasserin aut Diabaté Abdoulaye verfasserin aut Morand Serge verfasserin aut Simard Frédéric verfasserin aut In Parasites & Vectors BMC, 2008 5(2012), 1, p 65 (DE-627)558690076 (DE-600)2409480-8 17563305 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:1, p 65 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 kostenfrei http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 1, p 65 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 doi (DE-627)DOAJ07697961X (DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC109-216 Gimonneau Geoffrey verfasserin aut Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< Infectious and parasitic diseases Pombi Marco verfasserin aut Dabiré Roch K verfasserin aut Diabaté Abdoulaye verfasserin aut Morand Serge verfasserin aut Simard Frédéric verfasserin aut In Parasites & Vectors BMC, 2008 5(2012), 1, p 65 (DE-627)558690076 (DE-600)2409480-8 17563305 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:1, p 65 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 kostenfrei http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 1, p 65 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 doi (DE-627)DOAJ07697961X (DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC109-216 Gimonneau Geoffrey verfasserin aut Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< Infectious and parasitic diseases Pombi Marco verfasserin aut Dabiré Roch K verfasserin aut Diabaté Abdoulaye verfasserin aut Morand Serge verfasserin aut Simard Frédéric verfasserin aut In Parasites & Vectors BMC, 2008 5(2012), 1, p 65 (DE-627)558690076 (DE-600)2409480-8 17563305 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:1, p 65 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 kostenfrei http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 1, p 65 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 doi (DE-627)DOAJ07697961X (DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC109-216 Gimonneau Geoffrey verfasserin aut Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< Infectious and parasitic diseases Pombi Marco verfasserin aut Dabiré Roch K verfasserin aut Diabaté Abdoulaye verfasserin aut Morand Serge verfasserin aut Simard Frédéric verfasserin aut In Parasites & Vectors BMC, 2008 5(2012), 1, p 65 (DE-627)558690076 (DE-600)2409480-8 17563305 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:1, p 65 https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 kostenfrei http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 1, p 65 |
language |
English |
source |
In Parasites & Vectors 5(2012), 1, p 65 volume:5 year:2012 number:1, p 65 |
sourceStr |
In Parasites & Vectors 5(2012), 1, p 65 volume:5 year:2012 number:1, p 65 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Infectious and parasitic diseases |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Parasites & Vectors |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gimonneau Geoffrey @@aut@@ Pombi Marco @@aut@@ Dabiré Roch K @@aut@@ Diabaté Abdoulaye @@aut@@ Morand Serge @@aut@@ Simard Frédéric @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
558690076 |
id |
DOAJ07697961X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ07697961X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309145855.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1756-3305-5-65</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ07697961X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC109-216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gimonneau Geoffrey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Infectious and parasitic diseases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pombi Marco</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dabiré Roch K</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diabaté Abdoulaye</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morand Serge</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simard Frédéric</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Parasites & Vectors</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2012), 1, p 65</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)558690076</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2409480-8</subfield><subfield code="x">17563305</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 65</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Gimonneau Geoffrey |
spellingShingle |
Gimonneau Geoffrey misc RC109-216 misc Infectious and parasitic diseases Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso |
authorStr |
Gimonneau Geoffrey |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)558690076 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RC109-216 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
17563305 |
topic_title |
RC109-216 Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso |
topic |
misc RC109-216 misc Infectious and parasitic diseases |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RC109-216 misc Infectious and parasitic diseases |
topic_browse |
misc RC109-216 misc Infectious and parasitic diseases |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Parasites & Vectors |
hierarchy_parent_id |
558690076 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Parasites & Vectors |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)558690076 (DE-600)2409480-8 |
title |
Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ07697961X (DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 |
title_full |
Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso |
author_sort |
Gimonneau Geoffrey |
journal |
Parasites & Vectors |
journalStr |
Parasites & Vectors |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2012 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Gimonneau Geoffrey Pombi Marco Dabiré Roch K Diabaté Abdoulaye Morand Serge Simard Frédéric |
container_volume |
5 |
class |
RC109-216 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Gimonneau Geoffrey |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
behavioural responses of <it<anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto m and s molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in burkina faso |
callnumber |
RC109-216 |
title_auth |
Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso |
abstract |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< |
abstractGer |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< |
abstract_unstemmed |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p< |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1, p 65 |
title_short |
Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95 http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65 https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Pombi Marco Dabiré Roch K Diabaté Abdoulaye Morand Serge Simard Frédéric |
author2Str |
Pombi Marco Dabiré Roch K Diabaté Abdoulaye Morand Serge Simard Frédéric |
ppnlink |
558690076 |
callnumber-subject |
RC - Internal Medicine |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/1756-3305-5-65 |
callnumber-a |
RC109-216 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:22:01.510Z |
_version_ |
1803602017922318337 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ07697961X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309145855.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1756-3305-5-65</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ07697961X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC109-216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gimonneau Geoffrey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Behavioural responses of <it<Anopheles gambiae </it<sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Background</p< <p<Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito <it<Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto </it<in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of <it<An. gambiae </it<that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.</p< <p<Methods</p< <p<Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female <it<An. gambiae </it<collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer <it<Anisops jaczewskii</it<. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; <it<P </it<< 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid (<it<P </it<< 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall (<it<P </it<< 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of <it<An. gambiae </it<in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Infectious and parasitic diseases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pombi Marco</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dabiré Roch K</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diabaté Abdoulaye</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morand Serge</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simard Frédéric</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Parasites & Vectors</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2012), 1, p 65</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)558690076</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2409480-8</subfield><subfield code="x">17563305</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-65</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6acdfe3deb89425d9ccca5cbda9cda95</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/5/1/65</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 65</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399723 |