Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal
The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium si...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Anish Shrestha [verfasserIn] Basanta Sapkota [verfasserIn] Ritu Regmi [verfasserIn] Surya Mani Dhungana [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Azarian Journal of Agriculture - Azarian Journals, 2016, 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:5 ; year:2018 ; number:1 ; pages:12-19 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ077146158 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ077146158 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309150631.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ077146158 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a S1-972 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a SB1-1110 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Anish Shrestha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a manure 13.55% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fertilizer 16.49% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a micro-nutrient 2.59% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pesticides 10.54% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a labor 19.48% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a animal/ machine 19.23% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a marketing & transport cost 2% | |
| 650 | 4 | |a and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel | |
| 650 | 4 | |a through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Banana cultivation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economics of Banana | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Marketing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Marketing Channel | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Agriculture (General) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Plant culture | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Basanta Sapkota |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ritu Regmi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Surya Mani Dhungana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Azarian Journal of Agriculture |d Azarian Journals, 2016 |g 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 |w (DE-627)816693803 |w (DE-600)2807227-3 |x 23834420 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:12-19 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 5 |j 2018 |e 1 |h 12-19 | ||
| author_variant |
a s as b s bs r r rr s m d smd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23834420:2018----::cnmcopoutoadaktnobnnic |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
S |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ077146158 (DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 SB1-1110 Anish Shrestha verfasserin aut Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% manure 13.55% fertilizer 16.49% micro-nutrient 2.59% pesticides 10.54% labor 19.48% animal/ machine 19.23% marketing & transport cost 2% and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % Banana cultivation Economics of Banana Marketing Marketing Channel Agriculture (General) Plant culture Basanta Sapkota verfasserin aut Ritu Regmi verfasserin aut Surya Mani Dhungana verfasserin aut In Azarian Journal of Agriculture Azarian Journals, 2016 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 (DE-627)816693803 (DE-600)2807227-3 23834420 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 pages:12-19 https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 kostenfrei http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2018 1 12-19 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ077146158 (DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 SB1-1110 Anish Shrestha verfasserin aut Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% manure 13.55% fertilizer 16.49% micro-nutrient 2.59% pesticides 10.54% labor 19.48% animal/ machine 19.23% marketing & transport cost 2% and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % Banana cultivation Economics of Banana Marketing Marketing Channel Agriculture (General) Plant culture Basanta Sapkota verfasserin aut Ritu Regmi verfasserin aut Surya Mani Dhungana verfasserin aut In Azarian Journal of Agriculture Azarian Journals, 2016 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 (DE-627)816693803 (DE-600)2807227-3 23834420 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 pages:12-19 https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 kostenfrei http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2018 1 12-19 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ077146158 (DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 SB1-1110 Anish Shrestha verfasserin aut Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% manure 13.55% fertilizer 16.49% micro-nutrient 2.59% pesticides 10.54% labor 19.48% animal/ machine 19.23% marketing & transport cost 2% and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % Banana cultivation Economics of Banana Marketing Marketing Channel Agriculture (General) Plant culture Basanta Sapkota verfasserin aut Ritu Regmi verfasserin aut Surya Mani Dhungana verfasserin aut In Azarian Journal of Agriculture Azarian Journals, 2016 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 (DE-627)816693803 (DE-600)2807227-3 23834420 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 pages:12-19 https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 kostenfrei http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2018 1 12-19 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ077146158 (DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 SB1-1110 Anish Shrestha verfasserin aut Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% manure 13.55% fertilizer 16.49% micro-nutrient 2.59% pesticides 10.54% labor 19.48% animal/ machine 19.23% marketing & transport cost 2% and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % Banana cultivation Economics of Banana Marketing Marketing Channel Agriculture (General) Plant culture Basanta Sapkota verfasserin aut Ritu Regmi verfasserin aut Surya Mani Dhungana verfasserin aut In Azarian Journal of Agriculture Azarian Journals, 2016 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 (DE-627)816693803 (DE-600)2807227-3 23834420 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 pages:12-19 https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 kostenfrei http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2018 1 12-19 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ077146158 (DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 SB1-1110 Anish Shrestha verfasserin aut Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% manure 13.55% fertilizer 16.49% micro-nutrient 2.59% pesticides 10.54% labor 19.48% animal/ machine 19.23% marketing & transport cost 2% and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % Banana cultivation Economics of Banana Marketing Marketing Channel Agriculture (General) Plant culture Basanta Sapkota verfasserin aut Ritu Regmi verfasserin aut Surya Mani Dhungana verfasserin aut In Azarian Journal of Agriculture Azarian Journals, 2016 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 (DE-627)816693803 (DE-600)2807227-3 23834420 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 pages:12-19 https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 kostenfrei http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2018 1 12-19 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Azarian Journal of Agriculture 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 volume:5 year:2018 number:1 pages:12-19 |
| sourceStr |
In Azarian Journal of Agriculture 5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19 volume:5 year:2018 number:1 pages:12-19 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% manure 13.55% fertilizer 16.49% micro-nutrient 2.59% pesticides 10.54% labor 19.48% animal/ machine 19.23% marketing & transport cost 2% and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % Banana cultivation Economics of Banana Marketing Marketing Channel Agriculture (General) Plant culture |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Azarian Journal of Agriculture |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Anish Shrestha @@aut@@ Basanta Sapkota @@aut@@ Ritu Regmi @@aut@@ Surya Mani Dhungana @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
816693803 |
| id |
DOAJ077146158 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ077146158</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309150631.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ077146158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anish Shrestha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">manure 13.55%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fertilizer 16.49%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">micro-nutrient 2.59%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pesticides 10.54%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">labor 19.48%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">animal/ machine 19.23%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">marketing & transport cost 2%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Banana cultivation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics of Banana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marketing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marketing Channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Basanta Sapkota</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ritu Regmi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Surya Mani Dhungana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Azarian Journal of Agriculture</subfield><subfield code="d">Azarian Journals, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)816693803</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2807227-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23834420</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:12-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">12-19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
| author |
Anish Shrestha |
| spellingShingle |
Anish Shrestha misc S1-972 misc SB1-1110 misc Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small misc medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% misc manure 13.55% misc fertilizer 16.49% misc micro-nutrient 2.59% misc pesticides 10.54% misc labor 19.48% misc animal/ machine 19.23% misc marketing & transport cost 2% misc and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel misc through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % misc Banana cultivation misc Economics of Banana misc Marketing misc Marketing Channel misc Agriculture (General) misc Plant culture Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal |
| authorStr |
Anish Shrestha |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)816693803 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
S1-972 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23834420 |
| topic_title |
S1-972 SB1-1110 Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% manure 13.55% fertilizer 16.49% micro-nutrient 2.59% pesticides 10.54% labor 19.48% animal/ machine 19.23% marketing & transport cost 2% and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % Banana cultivation Economics of Banana Marketing Marketing Channel |
| topic |
misc S1-972 misc SB1-1110 misc Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small misc medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% misc manure 13.55% misc fertilizer 16.49% misc micro-nutrient 2.59% misc pesticides 10.54% misc labor 19.48% misc animal/ machine 19.23% misc marketing & transport cost 2% misc and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel misc through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % misc Banana cultivation misc Economics of Banana misc Marketing misc Marketing Channel misc Agriculture (General) misc Plant culture |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc S1-972 misc SB1-1110 misc Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small misc medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% misc manure 13.55% misc fertilizer 16.49% misc micro-nutrient 2.59% misc pesticides 10.54% misc labor 19.48% misc animal/ machine 19.23% misc marketing & transport cost 2% misc and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel misc through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % misc Banana cultivation misc Economics of Banana misc Marketing misc Marketing Channel misc Agriculture (General) misc Plant culture |
| topic_browse |
misc S1-972 misc SB1-1110 misc Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small misc medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66% misc manure 13.55% misc fertilizer 16.49% misc micro-nutrient 2.59% misc pesticides 10.54% misc labor 19.48% misc animal/ machine 19.23% misc marketing & transport cost 2% misc and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel misc through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 % misc Banana cultivation misc Economics of Banana misc Marketing misc Marketing Channel misc Agriculture (General) misc Plant culture |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Azarian Journal of Agriculture |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
816693803 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Azarian Journal of Agriculture |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)816693803 (DE-600)2807227-3 |
| title |
Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ077146158 (DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 |
| title_full |
Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal |
| author_sort |
Anish Shrestha |
| journal |
Azarian Journal of Agriculture |
| journalStr |
Azarian Journal of Agriculture |
| callnumber-first-code |
S |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
12 |
| author_browse |
Anish Shrestha Basanta Sapkota Ritu Regmi Surya Mani Dhungana |
| container_volume |
5 |
| class |
S1-972 SB1-1110 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Anish Shrestha |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
economics of production and marketing of banana in chitwan district, nepal |
| callnumber |
S1-972 |
| title_auth |
Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal |
| abstract |
The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. |
| abstractGer |
The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041 http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Basanta Sapkota Ritu Regmi Surya Mani Dhungana |
| author2Str |
Basanta Sapkota Ritu Regmi Surya Mani Dhungana |
| ppnlink |
816693803 |
| callnumber-subject |
S - General Agriculture |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
S1-972 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:04:49.931Z |
| _version_ |
1803604711107985408 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ077146158</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309150631.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ077146158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anish Shrestha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economics of production and marketing of banana in Chitwan district, Nepal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The study was conducted in several place of Chitwan, Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small, medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%, manure 13.55%, fertilizer 16.49%, micro-nutrient 2.59%, pesticides 10.54%, labor 19.48%, animal/ machine 19.23%, marketing & transport cost 2%, and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel, through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %, indicating commercial cultivation in study area.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nepal from where 90 representative farmers and 20 traders were selected randomly as sample. The farmers were categorized into small</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medium and large farm based on land holding size. The finding showed average productivity was maximum in medium size farm. Total cost of banana cultivation per bigha (1.5 bigha = 1 hector) was NRs. 239031 (106 NRs. = $1) excluding land rent. The share of planting material was 12.66%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">manure 13.55%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fertilizer 16.49%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">micro-nutrient 2.59%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pesticides 10.54%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">labor 19.48%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">animal/ machine 19.23%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">marketing & transport cost 2%</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">and miscellaneous 3.46%. The average return rate found to be highest in large farm and lowest in small farm. The average profit of banana cultivation found to be NRs. 131902.3 per bigha. The average benefit cost ratio was 1.55 in the study area. Producer–Collector–Wholesaler–Retailer–Consumer was the most prevalent marketing channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">through which 94.74% volume was traded. Disease and pest infestation was the major production problem and fluctuation in price for marketing. The average share of banana on annual income for farmers found to be 41.34 %</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Banana cultivation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics of Banana</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marketing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marketing Channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Basanta Sapkota</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ritu Regmi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Surya Mani Dhungana</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Azarian Journal of Agriculture</subfield><subfield code="d">Azarian Journals, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2018), 1, Seite 12-19</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)816693803</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2807227-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23834420</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:12-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f7e8f2f5c73c436c8509a0f0a8e6e041</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://azarianjournals.ir/wp-content/uploads/aja17120101.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2383-4420</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">12-19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400174 |