Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment
This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, an...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Lin Lin [verfasserIn] JunYi Wang [verfasserIn] XianYun Meng [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) - Kassel University Press, 2017, 17(2022), 17 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2022 ; number:17 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ078898420 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ078898420 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307012007.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230307s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ078898420 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a T58.5-58.64 | |
100 | 0 | |a Lin Lin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Online learning environment | |
650 | 4 | |a Learners | |
650 | 4 | |a Cognitive engagement | |
650 | 4 | |a PST model | |
650 | 4 | |a Technological affordance | |
650 | 4 | |a Educational affordance | |
653 | 0 | |a Education | |
653 | 0 | |a L | |
653 | 0 | |a Information technology | |
700 | 0 | |a JunYi Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a XianYun Meng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) |d Kassel University Press, 2017 |g 17(2022), 17 |w (DE-627)51597630X |w (DE-600)2244179-7 |x 18630383 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2022 |g number:17 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2086 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 17 |j 2022 |e 17 |
author_variant |
l l ll j w jw x m xm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18630383:2022----::nlecnfcosferesontveggmniaoln |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
T |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078898420 (DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T58.5-58.64 Lin Lin verfasserin aut Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. Online learning environment Learners Cognitive engagement PST model Technological affordance Educational affordance Education L Information technology JunYi Wang verfasserin aut XianYun Meng verfasserin aut In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) Kassel University Press, 2017 17(2022), 17 (DE-627)51597630X (DE-600)2244179-7 18630383 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:17 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d kostenfrei https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 17 |
spelling |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078898420 (DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T58.5-58.64 Lin Lin verfasserin aut Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. Online learning environment Learners Cognitive engagement PST model Technological affordance Educational affordance Education L Information technology JunYi Wang verfasserin aut XianYun Meng verfasserin aut In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) Kassel University Press, 2017 17(2022), 17 (DE-627)51597630X (DE-600)2244179-7 18630383 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:17 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d kostenfrei https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 17 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078898420 (DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T58.5-58.64 Lin Lin verfasserin aut Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. Online learning environment Learners Cognitive engagement PST model Technological affordance Educational affordance Education L Information technology JunYi Wang verfasserin aut XianYun Meng verfasserin aut In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) Kassel University Press, 2017 17(2022), 17 (DE-627)51597630X (DE-600)2244179-7 18630383 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:17 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d kostenfrei https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 17 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078898420 (DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T58.5-58.64 Lin Lin verfasserin aut Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. Online learning environment Learners Cognitive engagement PST model Technological affordance Educational affordance Education L Information technology JunYi Wang verfasserin aut XianYun Meng verfasserin aut In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) Kassel University Press, 2017 17(2022), 17 (DE-627)51597630X (DE-600)2244179-7 18630383 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:17 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d kostenfrei https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 17 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078898420 (DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng T58.5-58.64 Lin Lin verfasserin aut Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. Online learning environment Learners Cognitive engagement PST model Technological affordance Educational affordance Education L Information technology JunYi Wang verfasserin aut XianYun Meng verfasserin aut In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) Kassel University Press, 2017 17(2022), 17 (DE-627)51597630X (DE-600)2244179-7 18630383 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:17 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d kostenfrei https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2022 17 |
language |
English |
source |
In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 17(2022), 17 volume:17 year:2022 number:17 |
sourceStr |
In International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 17(2022), 17 volume:17 year:2022 number:17 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Online learning environment Learners Cognitive engagement PST model Technological affordance Educational affordance Education L Information technology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Lin Lin @@aut@@ JunYi Wang @@aut@@ XianYun Meng @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
51597630X |
id |
DOAJ078898420 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ078898420</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307012007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ078898420</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T58.5-58.64</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lin Lin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Online learning environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Learners</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cognitive engagement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PST model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technological affordance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational affordance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Information technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JunYi Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XianYun Meng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)</subfield><subfield code="d">Kassel University Press, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2022), 17</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)51597630X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2244179-7</subfield><subfield code="x">18630383</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">17</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Lin Lin |
spellingShingle |
Lin Lin misc T58.5-58.64 misc Online learning environment misc Learners misc Cognitive engagement misc PST model misc Technological affordance misc Educational affordance misc Education misc L misc Information technology Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment |
authorStr |
Lin Lin |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)51597630X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
T58 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
18630383 |
topic_title |
T58.5-58.64 Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment Online learning environment Learners Cognitive engagement PST model Technological affordance Educational affordance |
topic |
misc T58.5-58.64 misc Online learning environment misc Learners misc Cognitive engagement misc PST model misc Technological affordance misc Educational affordance misc Education misc L misc Information technology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc T58.5-58.64 misc Online learning environment misc Learners misc Cognitive engagement misc PST model misc Technological affordance misc Educational affordance misc Education misc L misc Information technology |
topic_browse |
misc T58.5-58.64 misc Online learning environment misc Learners misc Cognitive engagement misc PST model misc Technological affordance misc Educational affordance misc Education misc L misc Information technology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) |
hierarchy_parent_id |
51597630X |
hierarchy_top_title |
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)51597630X (DE-600)2244179-7 |
title |
Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ078898420 (DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d |
title_full |
Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment |
author_sort |
Lin Lin |
journal |
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) |
journalStr |
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Lin Lin JunYi Wang XianYun Meng |
container_volume |
17 |
class |
T58.5-58.64 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Lin Lin |
doi_str_mv |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment |
callnumber |
T58.5-58.64 |
title_auth |
Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment |
abstract |
This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. |
abstractGer |
This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
17 |
title_short |
Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851 https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
JunYi Wang XianYun Meng |
author2Str |
JunYi Wang XianYun Meng |
ppnlink |
51597630X |
callnumber-subject |
T - General Technology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851 |
callnumber-a |
T58.5-58.64 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T20:30:31.644Z |
_version_ |
1803591228216836096 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ078898420</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307012007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ078898420</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T58.5-58.64</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lin Lin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influencing Factors of Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in an Online Learning Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study used the Pedagogical Affordance-Social Affordance-Technical Affordance (PST) model as basis in designing a questionnaire to investigate the influencing factors of learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment. Moreover, the influencing degrees of educational, social, and technological affordances on learners’ cognitive engagement in an online learning environment were estimated. Research results demonstrated that the overall Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.883, KMO was 0.859, and cumulative variance interpretation rate after rotation was 79.199%. Thus, the designed questionnaire has very good reliability and validity. Educational affordance can significantly improve learners’ superficial and deep learning engagements. Social and technological affordances can significantly increase learners’ superficial learning engagement, but they cannot significantly increase deep learning engagement. Online learning contact time has significant differences under the 1% and 10% levels. Research results can provide some references to explore the relationship between the PST model and cognitive engagement and improve the overall affordance of an online learning environment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Online learning environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Learners</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cognitive engagement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PST model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technological affordance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational affordance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Information technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JunYi Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XianYun Meng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)</subfield><subfield code="d">Kassel University Press, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2022), 17</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)51597630X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2244179-7</subfield><subfield code="x">18630383</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.33851</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/142643a5ccf84fb6bab5ecfe4f5f644d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/33851</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">17</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4000187 |