Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Cuiyu Yang [verfasserIn] Dong Huang [verfasserIn] Yang Yang [verfasserIn] Jingyan Yang [verfasserIn] Yuyang Chen [verfasserIn] Mei Pan [verfasserIn] Songying Zhang [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery - KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019, 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:5 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; pages:111-115

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ078937884

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ078937884
003	DE-627
005	20230307012207.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230307s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ078937884
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RD1-811
100	0		\|a Cuiyu Yang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up.
650		4	\|a Cervical cerclage
650		4	\|a Cervical insufficiency
650		4	\|a Laparoscopic
650		4	\|a Conization
650		4	\|a Preterm birth
653		0	\|a Surgery
700	0		\|a Dong Huang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yang Yang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jingyan Yang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yuyang Chen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Mei Pan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Songying Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery \|d KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019 \|g 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 \|w (DE-627)1697051928 \|w (DE-600)3019937-2 \|x 24689009 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:5 \|g year:2022 \|g number:3 \|g pages:111-115
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 5 \|j 2022 \|e 3 \|h 111-115

Indexfelder

author_variant	c y cy d h dh y y yy j y jy y c yc m p mp s z sz
matchkey_str	article:24689009:2022----::ucmsfainshhvudroeaaocpcboiacrl
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	RD
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078937884 (DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Cuiyu Yang verfasserin aut Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up. Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth Surgery Dong Huang verfasserin aut Yang Yang verfasserin aut Jingyan Yang verfasserin aut Yuyang Chen verfasserin aut Mei Pan verfasserin aut Songying Zhang verfasserin aut In Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 (DE-627)1697051928 (DE-600)3019937-2 24689009 nnns volume:5 year:2022 number:3 pages:111-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2022 3 111-115
spelling	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078937884 (DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Cuiyu Yang verfasserin aut Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up. Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth Surgery Dong Huang verfasserin aut Yang Yang verfasserin aut Jingyan Yang verfasserin aut Yuyang Chen verfasserin aut Mei Pan verfasserin aut Songying Zhang verfasserin aut In Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 (DE-627)1697051928 (DE-600)3019937-2 24689009 nnns volume:5 year:2022 number:3 pages:111-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2022 3 111-115
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078937884 (DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Cuiyu Yang verfasserin aut Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up. Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth Surgery Dong Huang verfasserin aut Yang Yang verfasserin aut Jingyan Yang verfasserin aut Yuyang Chen verfasserin aut Mei Pan verfasserin aut Songying Zhang verfasserin aut In Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 (DE-627)1697051928 (DE-600)3019937-2 24689009 nnns volume:5 year:2022 number:3 pages:111-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2022 3 111-115
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078937884 (DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Cuiyu Yang verfasserin aut Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up. Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth Surgery Dong Huang verfasserin aut Yang Yang verfasserin aut Jingyan Yang verfasserin aut Yuyang Chen verfasserin aut Mei Pan verfasserin aut Songying Zhang verfasserin aut In Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 (DE-627)1697051928 (DE-600)3019937-2 24689009 nnns volume:5 year:2022 number:3 pages:111-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2022 3 111-115
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 doi (DE-627)DOAJ078937884 (DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Cuiyu Yang verfasserin aut Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up. Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth Surgery Dong Huang verfasserin aut Yang Yang verfasserin aut Jingyan Yang verfasserin aut Yuyang Chen verfasserin aut Mei Pan verfasserin aut Songying Zhang verfasserin aut In Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 (DE-627)1697051928 (DE-600)3019937-2 24689009 nnns volume:5 year:2022 number:3 pages:111-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2022 3 111-115
language	English
source	In Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 volume:5 year:2022 number:3 pages:111-115
sourceStr	In Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery 5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115 volume:5 year:2022 number:3 pages:111-115
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth Surgery
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Cuiyu Yang @@aut@@ Dong Huang @@aut@@ Yang Yang @@aut@@ Jingyan Yang @@aut@@ Yuyang Chen @@aut@@ Mei Pan @@aut@@ Songying Zhang @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1697051928
id	DOAJ078937884
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ078937884</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307012207.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ078937884</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD1-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cuiyu Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cervical cerclage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cervical insufficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laparoscopic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Preterm birth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong Huang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jingyan Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuyang Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mei Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Songying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1697051928</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3019937-2</subfield><subfield code="x">24689009</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-115</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">111-115</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Cuiyu Yang
spellingShingle	Cuiyu Yang misc RD1-811 misc Cervical cerclage misc Cervical insufficiency misc Laparoscopic misc Conization misc Preterm birth misc Surgery Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study
authorStr	Cuiyu Yang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1697051928
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RD1-811
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	24689009
topic_title	RD1-811 Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study Cervical cerclage Cervical insufficiency Laparoscopic Conization Preterm birth
topic	misc RD1-811 misc Cervical cerclage misc Cervical insufficiency misc Laparoscopic misc Conization misc Preterm birth misc Surgery
topic_unstemmed	misc RD1-811 misc Cervical cerclage misc Cervical insufficiency misc Laparoscopic misc Conization misc Preterm birth misc Surgery
topic_browse	misc RD1-811 misc Cervical cerclage misc Cervical insufficiency misc Laparoscopic misc Conization misc Preterm birth misc Surgery
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
hierarchy_parent_id	1697051928
hierarchy_top_title	Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1697051928 (DE-600)3019937-2
title	Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ078937884 (DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496
title_full	Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study
author_sort	Cuiyu Yang
journal	Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
journalStr	Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	111
author_browse	Cuiyu Yang Dong Huang Yang Yang Jingyan Yang Yuyang Chen Mei Pan Songying Zhang
container_volume	5
class	RD1-811
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Cuiyu Yang
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a retrospective study
callnumber	RD1-811
title_auth	Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study
abstract	Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up.
abstractGer	Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up.
abstract_unstemmed	Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002 https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500 https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009
remote_bool	true
author2	Dong Huang Yang Yang Jingyan Yang Yuyang Chen Mei Pan Songying Zhang
author2Str	Dong Huang Yang Yang Jingyan Yang Yuyang Chen Mei Pan Songying Zhang
ppnlink	1697051928
callnumber-subject	RD - Surgery
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002
callnumber-a	RD1-811
up_date	2024-07-03T20:43:33.667Z
_version_	1803592048302882816
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ078937884</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230307012207.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ078937884</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcaec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD1-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cuiyu Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: This study aims to evaluate the surgical morbidity and obstetric outcomes following in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (LAC) for patients who were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency or had a short cervix. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LAC between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The patients were diagnosed with refractory cervical insufficiency based upon a previous failed transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC), or had a short cervix who were considered unsuitable for a TVC after a previous cervical procedure. All patients were followed-up after surgery with transperineal ultrasonography until May 2020. Subsequently, surgical and obstetric data were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent LAC, with 8 patients in-pregnancy and 36 pre-pregnancy. For the patient with pre-pregancy LAC, the pregnancy rate was 80.6% (29/36), including 3 patients with first-trimester loss, 1 patient with an ectopic pregnancy, and 25 patients with a delivery. For the remaining 7 patients, 3 did not conceive, and another 4 had no pregnancy plans. All the patients with in-pregnancy LAC had a delivery. The “take-home baby” rate was 89.2% (33/37), with a live-birth rate of 100% and a neonatal survival rate of 100% for both patients with in-pregnancy and pre-pregnancy LAC. For patients with in-pregnancy LAC, 75.0% (6/8) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 12.5% (1/8) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. For patients with pre-pregnancy LAC, 80.0% (20/25) patients delivered at ≥37 wk of gestation, 16.0% (4/25) delivered between 34 and 36+6 wk, and 4.0% (1/25) delivered between 28 and 33+6 wk. No adverse-event intra-operative or post-operative sequelae were noted. Conclusions: LAC is an effective and safe procedure that results in remarkable obstetric outcomes for women with refractory cervical insufficiency, or with a short cervix who are considered unsuitable for a TVC. The success rate of in-pregnancy or pre-pregnancy LAC depends on a full evaluation of patients, a proper peri-operative management and close follow-up.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cervical cerclage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cervical insufficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laparoscopic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Preterm birth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong Huang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yang Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jingyan Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuyang Chen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mei Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Songying Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">KeAi Communications Co., Ltd., 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2022), 3, Seite 111-115</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1697051928</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3019937-2</subfield><subfield code="x">24689009</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-115</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.07.002</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/caec19ba2b264a7ca5f89fb4dc06d496</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000500</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2468-9009</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">111-115</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3984547

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: A retrospective study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?