The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic

Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Wang QL [verfasserIn] Han BR [verfasserIn] Yue P [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare - Dove Medical Press, 2008, (2022), Seite 1667-1676
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2022 ; pages:1667-1676

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ079187676

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ079187676
003	DE-627
005	20230501180158.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230307s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ079187676
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a R5-920
100	0		\|a Wang QL \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort
650		4	\|a covid-19
650		4	\|a deathbed
650		4	\|a emergency department
650		4	\|a hospice care
650		4	\|a mental state
650		4	\|a comfort
653		0	\|a Medicine (General)
700	0		\|a Han BR \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yue P \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare \|d Dove Medical Press, 2008 \|g (2022), Seite 1667-1676 \|w (DE-627)579829413 \|w (DE-600)2453343-9 \|x 11782390 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2022 \|g pages:1667-1676
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2022 \|h 1667-1676

Indexfelder

author_variant	w q wq h b hb y p yp
matchkey_str	article:11782390:2022----::hefccohsieaeotrialilmrecptetdrnte
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	R
publishDate	2022
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ079187676 (DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Wang QL verfasserin aut The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort Medicine (General) Han BR verfasserin aut Yue P verfasserin aut In Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Dove Medical Press, 2008 (2022), Seite 1667-1676 (DE-627)579829413 (DE-600)2453343-9 11782390 nnns year:2022 pages:1667-1676 https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022 1667-1676
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ079187676 (DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Wang QL verfasserin aut The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort Medicine (General) Han BR verfasserin aut Yue P verfasserin aut In Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Dove Medical Press, 2008 (2022), Seite 1667-1676 (DE-627)579829413 (DE-600)2453343-9 11782390 nnns year:2022 pages:1667-1676 https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022 1667-1676
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ079187676 (DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Wang QL verfasserin aut The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort Medicine (General) Han BR verfasserin aut Yue P verfasserin aut In Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Dove Medical Press, 2008 (2022), Seite 1667-1676 (DE-627)579829413 (DE-600)2453343-9 11782390 nnns year:2022 pages:1667-1676 https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022 1667-1676
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ079187676 (DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Wang QL verfasserin aut The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort Medicine (General) Han BR verfasserin aut Yue P verfasserin aut In Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Dove Medical Press, 2008 (2022), Seite 1667-1676 (DE-627)579829413 (DE-600)2453343-9 11782390 nnns year:2022 pages:1667-1676 https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022 1667-1676
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ079187676 (DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Wang QL verfasserin aut The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort Medicine (General) Han BR verfasserin aut Yue P verfasserin aut In Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Dove Medical Press, 2008 (2022), Seite 1667-1676 (DE-627)579829413 (DE-600)2453343-9 11782390 nnns year:2022 pages:1667-1676 https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2022 1667-1676
language	English
source	In Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (2022), Seite 1667-1676 year:2022 pages:1667-1676
sourceStr	In Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (2022), Seite 1667-1676 year:2022 pages:1667-1676
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort Medicine (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Wang QL @@aut@@ Han BR @@aut@@ Yue P @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	579829413
id	DOAJ079187676
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079187676</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501180158.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079187676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang QL</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">covid-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deathbed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergency department</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hospice care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">mental state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">comfort</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Han BR</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yue P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), Seite 1667-1676</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)579829413</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2453343-9</subfield><subfield code="x">11782390</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1667-1676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">1667-1676</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Wang QL
spellingShingle	Wang QL misc R5-920 misc covid-19 misc deathbed misc emergency department misc hospice care misc mental state misc comfort misc Medicine (General) The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic
authorStr	Wang QL
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)579829413
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	R5-920
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	11782390
topic_title	R5-920 The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic covid-19 deathbed emergency department hospice care mental state comfort
topic	misc R5-920 misc covid-19 misc deathbed misc emergency department misc hospice care misc mental state misc comfort misc Medicine (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc R5-920 misc covid-19 misc deathbed misc emergency department misc hospice care misc mental state misc comfort misc Medicine (General)
topic_browse	misc R5-920 misc covid-19 misc deathbed misc emergency department misc hospice care misc mental state misc comfort misc Medicine (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
hierarchy_parent_id	579829413
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)579829413 (DE-600)2453343-9
title	The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ079187676 (DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c
title_full	The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic
author_sort	Wang QL
journal	Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
journalStr	Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	1667
author_browse	Wang QL Han BR Yue P
class	R5-920
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Wang QL
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic
callnumber	R5-920
title_auth	The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic
abstract	Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort
abstractGer	Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort
abstract_unstemmed	Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic
url	https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390
remote_bool	true
author2	Han BR Yue P
author2Str	Han BR Yue P
ppnlink	579829413
callnumber-subject	R - General Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	R5-920
up_date	2024-07-03T22:10:19.684Z
_version_	1803597507133964288
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079187676</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501180158.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079187676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang QL</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qing-Ling Wang,1,&ast; Bin-Ru Han,2,&ast; Peng Yue3 1Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qing-Ling Wang, Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 of Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13693377666, Fax +86 10 8316 1294, Email PengYue_yp163.comObjective: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of hospice care for terminally ill emergency patients in the COVID-19 context.Methods: A total of 86 terminally ill emergency patients at the authors’ hospital from February 2020 to October 2020 were included in this study, they were randomly allocated into a control (n = 42) and an intervention (n = 44) group, respectively. The control group received routine nursing care, and the intervention group received hospice care.Results: Following treatment, the survival time (as the primary outcome) in the intervention group was longer than in the control group (P < 0.05). Distress thermometer and psychological pain-related factor scores for the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001 for both). The comfort scores of all dimensions in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores for survival puzzle, symptom distress, independence, and mental well-being in all dimensions related to a sense of dignity were lower in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). The intervention group’s yield, avoidance, and total scores were lower than in the control group, whereas the face score was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all).Conclusion: In the current COVID-19 context, the telehealth (psychological, physical, online remote support, critical illness communication, and death education) approach adopted by the Anning care team for terminally ill emergency patients and other aspects of peace care could help improve the physical and mental health of patients. Hospice care can minimise the physical and psychological pain of terminally ill patients in the emergency department and assist them in their final stage of life by providing a calming and comfortable environment.Keywords: COVID-19, deathbed, emergency department, hospice care, mental state, comfort</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">covid-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deathbed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergency department</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hospice care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">mental state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">comfort</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Han BR</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yue P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), Seite 1667-1676</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)579829413</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2453343-9</subfield><subfield code="x">11782390</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1667-1676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/83a239d7f1674d32b010934b8173651c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/the-efficacy-of-hospice-care-for-terminally-ill-emergency-patients-dur-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2390</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">1667-1676</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401248

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The Efficacy of Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Emergency Patients During the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?