Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification
Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jacó C. Gomes [verfasserIn] Díbio L. Borges [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Agronomy - MDPI AG, 2012, 12(2022), 8, p 1733 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:2022 ; number:8, p 1733 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ079242367 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ079242367 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414075943.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230307s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/agronomy12081733 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ079242367 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Jacó C. Gomes |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. | ||
650 | 4 | |a few-shot learning | |
650 | 4 | |a insect pest classification | |
650 | 4 | |a insect maturity stages | |
650 | 4 | |a RGB images | |
653 | 0 | |a Agriculture | |
653 | 0 | |a S | |
700 | 0 | |a Díbio L. Borges |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Agronomy |d MDPI AG, 2012 |g 12(2022), 8, p 1733 |w (DE-627)658000543 |w (DE-600)2607043-1 |x 20734395 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2022 |g number:8, p 1733 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2022 |e 8, p 1733 |
author_variant |
j c g jcg d l b dlb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20734395:2022----::netetmgrcgiinfwhtahnlannapocicuiga |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079242367 (DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jacó C. Gomes verfasserin aut Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. few-shot learning insect pest classification insect maturity stages RGB images Agriculture S Díbio L. Borges verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 8, p 1733 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:8, p 1733 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 8, p 1733 |
spelling |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079242367 (DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jacó C. Gomes verfasserin aut Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. few-shot learning insect pest classification insect maturity stages RGB images Agriculture S Díbio L. Borges verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 8, p 1733 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:8, p 1733 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 8, p 1733 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079242367 (DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jacó C. Gomes verfasserin aut Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. few-shot learning insect pest classification insect maturity stages RGB images Agriculture S Díbio L. Borges verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 8, p 1733 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:8, p 1733 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 8, p 1733 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079242367 (DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jacó C. Gomes verfasserin aut Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. few-shot learning insect pest classification insect maturity stages RGB images Agriculture S Díbio L. Borges verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 8, p 1733 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:8, p 1733 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 8, p 1733 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079242367 (DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jacó C. Gomes verfasserin aut Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. few-shot learning insect pest classification insect maturity stages RGB images Agriculture S Díbio L. Borges verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 12(2022), 8, p 1733 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:12 year:2022 number:8, p 1733 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2022 8, p 1733 |
language |
English |
source |
In Agronomy 12(2022), 8, p 1733 volume:12 year:2022 number:8, p 1733 |
sourceStr |
In Agronomy 12(2022), 8, p 1733 volume:12 year:2022 number:8, p 1733 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
few-shot learning insect pest classification insect maturity stages RGB images Agriculture S |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Agronomy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jacó C. Gomes @@aut@@ Díbio L. Borges @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
658000543 |
id |
DOAJ079242367 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079242367</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414075943.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy12081733</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079242367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jacó C. Gomes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">few-shot learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">insect pest classification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">insect maturity stages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">RGB images</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Díbio L. Borges</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2022), 8, p 1733</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8, p 1733</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">8, p 1733</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jacó C. Gomes |
spellingShingle |
Jacó C. Gomes misc few-shot learning misc insect pest classification misc insect maturity stages misc RGB images misc Agriculture misc S Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification |
authorStr |
Jacó C. Gomes |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)658000543 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20734395 |
topic_title |
Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification few-shot learning insect pest classification insect maturity stages RGB images |
topic |
misc few-shot learning misc insect pest classification misc insect maturity stages misc RGB images misc Agriculture misc S |
topic_unstemmed |
misc few-shot learning misc insect pest classification misc insect maturity stages misc RGB images misc Agriculture misc S |
topic_browse |
misc few-shot learning misc insect pest classification misc insect maturity stages misc RGB images misc Agriculture misc S |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Agronomy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
658000543 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Agronomy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 |
title |
Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ079242367 (DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 |
title_full |
Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification |
author_sort |
Jacó C. Gomes |
journal |
Agronomy |
journalStr |
Agronomy |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Jacó C. Gomes Díbio L. Borges |
container_volume |
12 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jacó C. Gomes |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
insect pest image recognition: a few-shot machine learning approach including maturity stages classification |
title_auth |
Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification |
abstract |
Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. |
abstractGer |
Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
8, p 1733 |
title_short |
Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733 https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58 https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Díbio L. Borges |
author2Str |
Díbio L. Borges |
ppnlink |
658000543 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/agronomy12081733 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:27:51.306Z |
_version_ |
1803598609837457408 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079242367</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414075943.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230307s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy12081733</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079242367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jacó C. Gomes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Insect Pest Image Recognition: A Few-Shot Machine Learning Approach including Maturity Stages Classification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recognizing insect pests using images is an important and challenging research issue. A correct species classification will help choosing a more proper mitigation strategy regarding crop management, but designing an automated solution is also difficult due to the high similarity between species at similar maturity stages. This research proposes a solution to this problem using a few-shot learning approach. First, a novel insect data set based on curated images from IP102 is presented. The IP-FSL data set is composed of 97 classes of adult insect images, and 45 classes of early stages, totalling 6817 images. Second, a few-shot prototypical network is proposed based on a comparison with other state-of-art models and further divergence analysis. Experiments were conducted separating the adult classes and the early stages into different groups. The best results achieved an accuracy of 86.33% for the adults, and 87.91% for early stages, both using a Kullback–Leibler divergence measure. These results are promising regarding a crop scenario where the more significant pests are few and it is important to detect them at earlier stages. Further research directions would be in evaluating a similar approach in particular crop ecosystems, and testing cross-domains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">few-shot learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">insect pest classification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">insect maturity stages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">RGB images</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Díbio L. Borges</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2022), 8, p 1733</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8, p 1733</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081733</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/049b7ef727e948cd8e4073f2919ffb58</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/8/1733</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">8, p 1733</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400324 |