Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechani...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ying Yang [verfasserIn] Yonge Zhang [verfasserIn] Guodong Jia [verfasserIn] Ling Wang [verfasserIn] Xinxiao Yu [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Ecological Indicators - Elsevier, 2021, 139(2022), Seite 108958- |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:139 ; year:2022 ; pages:108958- |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ079778879 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ079778879 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308064937.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230308s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QH540-549.5 | |
100 | 0 | |a Ying Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Soil aggregation | |
650 | 4 | |a Thinning intensity | |
650 | 4 | |a Biotic factor | |
650 | 4 | |a Soil microarthropods | |
650 | 4 | |a Structural equation model | |
653 | 0 | |a Ecology | |
700 | 0 | |a Yonge Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Guodong Jia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ling Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Xinxiao Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Ecological Indicators |d Elsevier, 2021 |g 139(2022), Seite 108958- |w (DE-627)338074163 |w (DE-600)2063587-4 |x 18727034 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:139 |g year:2022 |g pages:108958- |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 139 |j 2022 |h 108958- |
author_variant |
y y yy y z yz g j gj l w lw x y xy |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18727034:2022----::otiuinoboiadboifcosoolgrgtoudrifr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QH |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958- |
spelling |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958- |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958- |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958- |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958- |
language |
English |
source |
In Ecological Indicators 139(2022), Seite 108958- volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- |
sourceStr |
In Ecological Indicators 139(2022), Seite 108958- volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Ecological Indicators |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ying Yang @@aut@@ Yonge Zhang @@aut@@ Guodong Jia @@aut@@ Ling Wang @@aut@@ Xinxiao Yu @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
338074163 |
id |
DOAJ079778879 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079778879</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308064937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230308s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079778879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Thinning intensity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biotic factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil microarthropods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structural equation model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yonge Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guodong Jia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ling Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xinxiao Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological Indicators</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2022), Seite 108958-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)338074163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2063587-4</subfield><subfield code="x">18727034</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108958-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">108958-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Ying Yang |
spellingShingle |
Ying Yang misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities |
authorStr |
Ying Yang |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)338074163 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QH540-549 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
18727034 |
topic_title |
QH540-549.5 Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model |
topic |
misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology |
topic_browse |
misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Ecological Indicators |
hierarchy_parent_id |
338074163 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Ecological Indicators |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 |
title |
Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 |
title_full |
Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities |
author_sort |
Ying Yang |
journal |
Ecological Indicators |
journalStr |
Ecological Indicators |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
108958 |
author_browse |
Ying Yang Yonge Zhang Guodong Jia Ling Wang Xinxiao Yu |
container_volume |
139 |
class |
QH540-549.5 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ying Yang |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities |
callnumber |
QH540-549.5 |
title_auth |
Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities |
abstract |
Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. |
abstractGer |
Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Yonge Zhang Guodong Jia Ling Wang Xinxiao Yu |
author2Str |
Yonge Zhang Guodong Jia Ling Wang Xinxiao Yu |
ppnlink |
338074163 |
callnumber-subject |
QH - Natural History and Biology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 |
callnumber-a |
QH540-549.5 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:47:53.322Z |
_version_ |
1803607419991883776 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079778879</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308064937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230308s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079778879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Thinning intensity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biotic factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil microarthropods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structural equation model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yonge Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guodong Jia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ling Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xinxiao Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological Indicators</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2022), Seite 108958-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)338074163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2063587-4</subfield><subfield code="x">18727034</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108958-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">108958-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4010725 |