Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities

Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechani...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ying Yang [verfasserIn] Yonge Zhang [verfasserIn] Guodong Jia [verfasserIn] Ling Wang [verfasserIn] Xinxiao Yu [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Ecological Indicators - Elsevier, 2021, 139(2022), Seite 108958-
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:139 ; year:2022 ; pages:108958-

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ079778879

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ079778879
003	DE-627
005	20230308064937.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230308s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ079778879
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QH540-549.5
100	0		\|a Ying Yang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.
650		4	\|a Soil aggregation
650		4	\|a Thinning intensity
650		4	\|a Biotic factor
650		4	\|a Soil microarthropods
650		4	\|a Structural equation model
653		0	\|a Ecology
700	0		\|a Yonge Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Guodong Jia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ling Wang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xinxiao Yu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Ecological Indicators \|d Elsevier, 2021 \|g 139(2022), Seite 108958- \|w (DE-627)338074163 \|w (DE-600)2063587-4 \|x 18727034 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:139 \|g year:2022 \|g pages:108958-
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 139 \|j 2022 \|h 108958-

Indexfelder

author_variant	y y yy y z yz g j gj l w lw x y xy
matchkey_str	article:18727034:2022----::otiuinoboiadboifcosoolgrgtoudrifr
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	QH
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958-
spelling	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958-
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958-
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958-
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Ying Yang verfasserin aut Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation. Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology Yonge Zhang verfasserin aut Guodong Jia verfasserin aut Ling Wang verfasserin aut Xinxiao Yu verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 139(2022), Seite 108958- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2022 108958-
language	English
source	In Ecological Indicators 139(2022), Seite 108958- volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958-
sourceStr	In Ecological Indicators 139(2022), Seite 108958- volume:139 year:2022 pages:108958-
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model Ecology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Ecological Indicators
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ying Yang @@aut@@ Yonge Zhang @@aut@@ Guodong Jia @@aut@@ Ling Wang @@aut@@ Xinxiao Yu @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	338074163
id	DOAJ079778879
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079778879</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308064937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230308s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079778879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Thinning intensity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biotic factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil microarthropods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structural equation model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yonge Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guodong Jia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ling Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xinxiao Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological Indicators</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2022), Seite 108958-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)338074163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2063587-4</subfield><subfield code="x">18727034</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108958-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">108958-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Ying Yang
spellingShingle	Ying Yang misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
authorStr	Ying Yang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)338074163
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QH540-549
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	18727034
topic_title	QH540-549.5 Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities Soil aggregation Thinning intensity Biotic factor Soil microarthropods Structural equation model
topic	misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology
topic_unstemmed	misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology
topic_browse	misc QH540-549.5 misc Soil aggregation misc Thinning intensity misc Biotic factor misc Soil microarthropods misc Structural equation model misc Ecology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Ecological Indicators
hierarchy_parent_id	338074163
hierarchy_top_title	Ecological Indicators
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4
title	Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ079778879 (DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49
title_full	Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
author_sort	Ying Yang
journal	Ecological Indicators
journalStr	Ecological Indicators
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	108958
author_browse	Ying Yang Yonge Zhang Guodong Jia Ling Wang Xinxiao Yu
container_volume	139
class	QH540-549.5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Ying Yang
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
callnumber	QH540-549.5
title_auth	Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
abstract	Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.
abstractGer	Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.
abstract_unstemmed	Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958 https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290 https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X
remote_bool	true
author2	Yonge Zhang Guodong Jia Ling Wang Xinxiao Yu
author2Str	Yonge Zhang Guodong Jia Ling Wang Xinxiao Yu
ppnlink	338074163
callnumber-subject	QH - Natural History and Biology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958
callnumber-a	QH540-549.5
up_date	2024-07-04T00:47:53.322Z
_version_	1803607419991883776
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079778879</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308064937.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230308s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079778879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ying Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggregation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were significantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil aggregation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Thinning intensity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biotic factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil microarthropods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structural equation model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yonge Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guodong Jia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ling Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xinxiao Yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological Indicators</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2022), Seite 108958-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)338074163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2063587-4</subfield><subfield code="x">18727034</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108958-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/bf381654017f41348fd1bf4a212d8f49</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22004290</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="h">108958-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4010725

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different thinning intensities

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?