Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria
Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on hum...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Niranjika Wijesooriya [verfasserIn] Arianna Brambilla [verfasserIn] Lina Markauskaite [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Cleaner Production Letters - Elsevier, 2022, 4(2023), Seite 100033- |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:2023 ; pages:100033- |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ079923003 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ079923003 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310173838.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230310s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ079923003 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a TA170-171 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a TD1-1066 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Niranjika Wijesooriya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Environmentally sustainable design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biophilic design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Architectural design studio | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Professional education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biophilic design frameworks | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Environmental engineering | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Arianna Brambilla |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Lina Markauskaite |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Cleaner Production Letters |d Elsevier, 2022 |g 4(2023), Seite 100033- |w (DE-627)1815087935 |x 26667916 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2023 |g pages:100033- |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 2023 |h 100033- | ||
| author_variant |
n w nw a b ab l m lm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:26667916:2023----::ipiidsgfaeokaeiwftutrdvlpetehiusnteroptbltw |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
TA |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079923003 (DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA170-171 TD1-1066 Niranjika Wijesooriya verfasserin aut Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. Environmentally sustainable design Biophilic design Architectural design studio Professional education Biophilic design frameworks Environmental engineering Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering Arianna Brambilla verfasserin aut Lina Markauskaite verfasserin aut In Cleaner Production Letters Elsevier, 2022 4(2023), Seite 100033- (DE-627)1815087935 26667916 nnns volume:4 year:2023 pages:100033- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2023 100033- |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079923003 (DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA170-171 TD1-1066 Niranjika Wijesooriya verfasserin aut Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. Environmentally sustainable design Biophilic design Architectural design studio Professional education Biophilic design frameworks Environmental engineering Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering Arianna Brambilla verfasserin aut Lina Markauskaite verfasserin aut In Cleaner Production Letters Elsevier, 2022 4(2023), Seite 100033- (DE-627)1815087935 26667916 nnns volume:4 year:2023 pages:100033- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2023 100033- |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079923003 (DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA170-171 TD1-1066 Niranjika Wijesooriya verfasserin aut Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. Environmentally sustainable design Biophilic design Architectural design studio Professional education Biophilic design frameworks Environmental engineering Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering Arianna Brambilla verfasserin aut Lina Markauskaite verfasserin aut In Cleaner Production Letters Elsevier, 2022 4(2023), Seite 100033- (DE-627)1815087935 26667916 nnns volume:4 year:2023 pages:100033- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2023 100033- |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079923003 (DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA170-171 TD1-1066 Niranjika Wijesooriya verfasserin aut Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. Environmentally sustainable design Biophilic design Architectural design studio Professional education Biophilic design frameworks Environmental engineering Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering Arianna Brambilla verfasserin aut Lina Markauskaite verfasserin aut In Cleaner Production Letters Elsevier, 2022 4(2023), Seite 100033- (DE-627)1815087935 26667916 nnns volume:4 year:2023 pages:100033- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2023 100033- |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 doi (DE-627)DOAJ079923003 (DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA170-171 TD1-1066 Niranjika Wijesooriya verfasserin aut Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. Environmentally sustainable design Biophilic design Architectural design studio Professional education Biophilic design frameworks Environmental engineering Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering Arianna Brambilla verfasserin aut Lina Markauskaite verfasserin aut In Cleaner Production Letters Elsevier, 2022 4(2023), Seite 100033- (DE-627)1815087935 26667916 nnns volume:4 year:2023 pages:100033- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2023 100033- |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Cleaner Production Letters 4(2023), Seite 100033- volume:4 year:2023 pages:100033- |
| sourceStr |
In Cleaner Production Letters 4(2023), Seite 100033- volume:4 year:2023 pages:100033- |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Environmentally sustainable design Biophilic design Architectural design studio Professional education Biophilic design frameworks Environmental engineering Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Cleaner Production Letters |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Niranjika Wijesooriya @@aut@@ Arianna Brambilla @@aut@@ Lina Markauskaite @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1815087935 |
| id |
DOAJ079923003 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079923003</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310173838.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079923003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA170-171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TD1-1066</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niranjika Wijesooriya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmentally sustainable design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biophilic design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Architectural design studio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Professional education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biophilic design frameworks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arianna Brambilla</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lina Markauskaite</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Cleaner Production Letters</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2023), Seite 100033-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1815087935</subfield><subfield code="x">26667916</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100033-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">100033-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
| author |
Niranjika Wijesooriya |
| spellingShingle |
Niranjika Wijesooriya misc TA170-171 misc TD1-1066 misc Environmentally sustainable design misc Biophilic design misc Architectural design studio misc Professional education misc Biophilic design frameworks misc Environmental engineering misc Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria |
| authorStr |
Niranjika Wijesooriya |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1815087935 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
TA170-171 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
26667916 |
| topic_title |
TA170-171 TD1-1066 Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria Environmentally sustainable design Biophilic design Architectural design studio Professional education Biophilic design frameworks |
| topic |
misc TA170-171 misc TD1-1066 misc Environmentally sustainable design misc Biophilic design misc Architectural design studio misc Professional education misc Biophilic design frameworks misc Environmental engineering misc Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc TA170-171 misc TD1-1066 misc Environmentally sustainable design misc Biophilic design misc Architectural design studio misc Professional education misc Biophilic design frameworks misc Environmental engineering misc Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
| topic_browse |
misc TA170-171 misc TD1-1066 misc Environmentally sustainable design misc Biophilic design misc Architectural design studio misc Professional education misc Biophilic design frameworks misc Environmental engineering misc Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Cleaner Production Letters |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1815087935 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Cleaner Production Letters |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1815087935 |
| title |
Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ079923003 (DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 |
| title_full |
Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria |
| author_sort |
Niranjika Wijesooriya |
| journal |
Cleaner Production Letters |
| journalStr |
Cleaner Production Letters |
| callnumber-first-code |
T |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2023 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
100033 |
| author_browse |
Niranjika Wijesooriya Arianna Brambilla Lina Markauskaite |
| container_volume |
4 |
| class |
TA170-171 TD1-1066 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Niranjika Wijesooriya |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
biophilic design frameworks: a review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with leed sustainable design criteria |
| callnumber |
TA170-171 |
| title_auth |
Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria |
| abstract |
Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. |
| abstractGer |
Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| title_short |
Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064 https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Arianna Brambilla Lina Markauskaite |
| author2Str |
Arianna Brambilla Lina Markauskaite |
| ppnlink |
1815087935 |
| callnumber-subject |
TA - General and Civil Engineering |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033 |
| callnumber-a |
TA170-171 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:21:48.902Z |
| _version_ |
1803609554451169280 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ079923003</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310173838.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ079923003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJaa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA170-171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TD1-1066</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Niranjika Wijesooriya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Environmentally sustainable design approach is characterised using design frameworks, a pre-determined set of criteria guiding designs to achieve sustainability provided in way of. green building rating tools. Recently, these green building design outcomes were criticised for lack of emphasis on human nature connectedness where biophilic design was identified as an approach that enhance nature connectedness. There is a growing trend in the building industry to incorporate biophilic design criteria into green building rating tools. However, the sustainable design approach is highly quantitative whereas biophilic design is qualitative. Hence, thorough understanding of both frameworks is required to develop a design framework overcoming the compatibility challenges. Furthermore, unlike the large volume of literature on green building rating tools, biophilic design frameworks are scarcely studied.Therefore, the aim of this paper is to fill this gap by 1) conducting the first analysis of all the current biophilic design frameworks to explore their structure and development techniques; and 2) examining the compatibility of biophilic criteria within frameworks with typical sustainable design criteria.The study presents a review of biophilic design frameworks identified through an extensive literature review followed by content analysis to find the development stages, techniques, and compatibility with sustainability criteria. Our analysis of seven biophilic frameworks revealed four techniques that were used to develop themes for categories, criteria, design strategies and building components. These techniques are: 1) literature synthesis, 2) framework synthesis, 3) interdisciplinary ideation, and 4) expert knowledge. Biophilic framework criteria has an average of 43% compatibility with green building rating tool criteria. It can be concluded that biophilic design is a sensory place-making approach and sustainable design is a building performance-based approach with opportunities for compatibility. The findings assist to understand the techniques in developing a biophilic design framework compatible with sustainable design approach.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmentally sustainable design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biophilic design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Architectural design studio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Professional education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biophilic design frameworks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arianna Brambilla</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lina Markauskaite</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Cleaner Production Letters</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2023), Seite 100033-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1815087935</subfield><subfield code="x">26667916</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100033-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/aa92973bb0be48e6bba1d7f03b93bc78</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000064</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7916</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">100033-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4021015 |