Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jeong-Min Kim [verfasserIn] Seon-Mi Lee [verfasserIn] Aeran Seol [verfasserIn] Jae-Yun Song [verfasserIn] Ki-Jin Ryu [verfasserIn] Sanghoon Lee [verfasserIn] Hyun-Tae Park [verfasserIn] Hyun-Woong Cho [verfasserIn] Kyung-Jin Min [verfasserIn] Jin-Hwa Hong [verfasserIn] Jae-Kwan Lee [verfasserIn] Nak-Woo Lee [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Personalized Medicine - MDPI AG, 2012, 13(2023), 2, p 205 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:13 ; year:2023 ; number:2, p 205 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/jpm13020205 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ080238440 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ080238440 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413062654.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230310s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/jpm13020205 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Jeong-Min Kim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. | ||
650 | 4 | |a single-port laparoscopic surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a single-port robotic surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a minimally invasive surgery | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
700 | 0 | |a Seon-Mi Lee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Aeran Seol |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jae-Yun Song |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Ki-Jin Ryu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Sanghoon Lee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hyun-Tae Park |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hyun-Woong Cho |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Kyung-Jin Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jin-Hwa Hong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jae-Kwan Lee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Nak-Woo Lee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Personalized Medicine |d MDPI AG, 2012 |g 13(2023), 2, p 205 |w (DE-627)71862713X |w (DE-600)2662248-8 |x 20754426 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:2, p 205 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2023 |e 2, p 205 |
author_variant |
j m k jmk s m l sml a s as j y s jys k j r kjr s l sl h t p htp h w c hwc k j m kjm j h h jhh j k l jkl n w l nwl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20754426:2023----::oprsnfugclucmsewesnlprlprsoisreyndvn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205 |
spelling |
10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205 |
language |
English |
source |
In Journal of Personalized Medicine 13(2023), 2, p 205 volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 |
sourceStr |
In Journal of Personalized Medicine 13(2023), 2, p 205 volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of Personalized Medicine |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jeong-Min Kim @@aut@@ Seon-Mi Lee @@aut@@ Aeran Seol @@aut@@ Jae-Yun Song @@aut@@ Ki-Jin Ryu @@aut@@ Sanghoon Lee @@aut@@ Hyun-Tae Park @@aut@@ Hyun-Woong Cho @@aut@@ Kyung-Jin Min @@aut@@ Jin-Hwa Hong @@aut@@ Jae-Kwan Lee @@aut@@ Nak-Woo Lee @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
71862713X |
id |
DOAJ080238440 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080238440</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413062654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080238440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong-Min Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port laparoscopic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port robotic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimally invasive surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seon-Mi Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aeran Seol</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yun Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ki-Jin Ryu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sanghoon Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Tae Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Woong Cho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyung-Jin Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Hwa Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Kwan Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nak-Woo Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Personalized Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 2, p 205</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)71862713X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2662248-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20754426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 205</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jeong-Min Kim |
spellingShingle |
Jeong-Min Kim misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery |
authorStr |
Jeong-Min Kim |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)71862713X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20754426 |
topic_title |
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery |
topic |
misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R |
topic_unstemmed |
misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R |
topic_browse |
misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Personalized Medicine |
hierarchy_parent_id |
71862713X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Personalized Medicine |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 |
title |
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b |
title_full |
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery |
author_sort |
Jeong-Min Kim |
journal |
Journal of Personalized Medicine |
journalStr |
Journal of Personalized Medicine |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Jeong-Min Kim Seon-Mi Lee Aeran Seol Jae-Yun Song Ki-Jin Ryu Sanghoon Lee Hyun-Tae Park Hyun-Woong Cho Kyung-Jin Min Jin-Hwa Hong Jae-Kwan Lee Nak-Woo Lee |
container_volume |
13 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jeong-Min Kim |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/jpm13020205 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
comparison of surgical outcomes between single-port laparoscopic surgery and da vinci single-port robotic surgery |
title_auth |
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery |
abstract |
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. |
abstractGer |
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
2, p 205 |
title_short |
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Seon-Mi Lee Aeran Seol Jae-Yun Song Ki-Jin Ryu Sanghoon Lee Hyun-Tae Park Hyun-Woong Cho Kyung-Jin Min Jin-Hwa Hong Jae-Kwan Lee Nak-Woo Lee |
author2Str |
Seon-Mi Lee Aeran Seol Jae-Yun Song Ki-Jin Ryu Sanghoon Lee Hyun-Tae Park Hyun-Woong Cho Kyung-Jin Min Jin-Hwa Hong Jae-Kwan Lee Nak-Woo Lee |
ppnlink |
71862713X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/jpm13020205 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T13:33:35.853Z |
_version_ |
1803564997260869632 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080238440</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413062654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080238440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong-Min Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port laparoscopic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port robotic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimally invasive surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seon-Mi Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aeran Seol</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yun Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ki-Jin Ryu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sanghoon Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Tae Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Woong Cho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyung-Jin Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Hwa Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Kwan Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nak-Woo Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Personalized Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 2, p 205</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)71862713X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2662248-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20754426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 205</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3994913 |