Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Jeong-Min Kim [verfasserIn] Seon-Mi Lee [verfasserIn] Aeran Seol [verfasserIn] Jae-Yun Song [verfasserIn] Ki-Jin Ryu [verfasserIn] Sanghoon Lee [verfasserIn] Hyun-Tae Park [verfasserIn] Hyun-Woong Cho [verfasserIn] Kyung-Jin Min [verfasserIn] Jin-Hwa Hong [verfasserIn] Jae-Kwan Lee [verfasserIn] Nak-Woo Lee [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Personalized Medicine - MDPI AG, 2012, 13(2023), 2, p 205
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:13 ; year:2023 ; number:2, p 205

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/jpm13020205

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ080238440

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ080238440
003	DE-627
005	20240413062654.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/jpm13020205 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ080238440
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Jeong-Min Kim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.
650		4	\|a single-port laparoscopic surgery
650		4	\|a single-port robotic surgery
650		4	\|a minimally invasive surgery
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
700	0		\|a Seon-Mi Lee \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Aeran Seol \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jae-Yun Song \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ki-Jin Ryu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Sanghoon Lee \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hyun-Tae Park \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hyun-Woong Cho \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Kyung-Jin Min \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jin-Hwa Hong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jae-Kwan Lee \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Nak-Woo Lee \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Personalized Medicine \|d MDPI AG, 2012 \|g 13(2023), 2, p 205 \|w (DE-627)71862713X \|w (DE-600)2662248-8 \|x 20754426 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:13 \|g year:2023 \|g number:2, p 205
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 13 \|j 2023 \|e 2, p 205

Indexfelder

author_variant	j m k jmk s m l sml a s as j y s jys k j r kjr s l sl h t p htp h w c hwc k j m kjm j h h jhh j k l jkl n w l nwl
matchkey_str	article:20754426:2023----::oprsnfugclucmsewesnlprlprsoisreyndvn
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205
spelling	10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205
allfieldsGer	10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205
allfieldsSound	10.3390/jpm13020205 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jeong-Min Kim verfasserin aut Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients. single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R Seon-Mi Lee verfasserin aut Aeran Seol verfasserin aut Jae-Yun Song verfasserin aut Ki-Jin Ryu verfasserin aut Sanghoon Lee verfasserin aut Hyun-Tae Park verfasserin aut Hyun-Woong Cho verfasserin aut Kyung-Jin Min verfasserin aut Jin-Hwa Hong verfasserin aut Jae-Kwan Lee verfasserin aut Nak-Woo Lee verfasserin aut In Journal of Personalized Medicine MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 2, p 205 (DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8 20754426 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 2, p 205
language	English
source	In Journal of Personalized Medicine 13(2023), 2, p 205 volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205
sourceStr	In Journal of Personalized Medicine 13(2023), 2, p 205 volume:13 year:2023 number:2, p 205
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery Medicine R
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Personalized Medicine
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Jeong-Min Kim @@aut@@ Seon-Mi Lee @@aut@@ Aeran Seol @@aut@@ Jae-Yun Song @@aut@@ Ki-Jin Ryu @@aut@@ Sanghoon Lee @@aut@@ Hyun-Tae Park @@aut@@ Hyun-Woong Cho @@aut@@ Kyung-Jin Min @@aut@@ Jin-Hwa Hong @@aut@@ Jae-Kwan Lee @@aut@@ Nak-Woo Lee @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	71862713X
id	DOAJ080238440
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080238440</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413062654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080238440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong-Min Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port laparoscopic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port robotic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimally invasive surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seon-Mi Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aeran Seol</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yun Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ki-Jin Ryu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sanghoon Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Tae Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Woong Cho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyung-Jin Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Hwa Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Kwan Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nak-Woo Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Personalized Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 2, p 205</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)71862713X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2662248-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20754426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 205</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Jeong-Min Kim
spellingShingle	Jeong-Min Kim misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
authorStr	Jeong-Min Kim
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)71862713X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20754426
topic_title	Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery single-port laparoscopic surgery single-port robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery
topic	misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R
topic_unstemmed	misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R
topic_browse	misc single-port laparoscopic surgery misc single-port robotic surgery misc minimally invasive surgery misc Medicine misc R
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Personalized Medicine
hierarchy_parent_id	71862713X
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Personalized Medicine
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)71862713X (DE-600)2662248-8
title	Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ080238440 (DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b
title_full	Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
author_sort	Jeong-Min Kim
journal	Journal of Personalized Medicine
journalStr	Journal of Personalized Medicine
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Jeong-Min Kim Seon-Mi Lee Aeran Seol Jae-Yun Song Ki-Jin Ryu Sanghoon Lee Hyun-Tae Park Hyun-Woong Cho Kyung-Jin Min Jin-Hwa Hong Jae-Kwan Lee Nak-Woo Lee
container_volume	13
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Jeong-Min Kim
doi_str_mv	10.3390/jpm13020205
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparison of surgical outcomes between single-port laparoscopic surgery and da vinci single-port robotic surgery
title_auth	Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
abstract	Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.
abstractGer	Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.
abstract_unstemmed	Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2, p 205
title_short	Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205 https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205 https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426
remote_bool	true
author2	Seon-Mi Lee Aeran Seol Jae-Yun Song Ki-Jin Ryu Sanghoon Lee Hyun-Tae Park Hyun-Woong Cho Kyung-Jin Min Jin-Hwa Hong Jae-Kwan Lee Nak-Woo Lee
author2Str	Seon-Mi Lee Aeran Seol Jae-Yun Song Ki-Jin Ryu Sanghoon Lee Hyun-Tae Park Hyun-Woong Cho Kyung-Jin Min Jin-Hwa Hong Jae-Kwan Lee Nak-Woo Lee
ppnlink	71862713X
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/jpm13020205
up_date	2024-07-03T13:33:35.853Z
_version_	1803564997260869632
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080238440</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413062654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080238440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong-Min Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student’s <i<t</i<-test. Results: A total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH; <i<n</i< = 148), single-port robotic hysterectomy (SPRH; <i<n</i< = 35), single-port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (SPLC; <i<n</i< = 207), single-port robotic ovarian cystectomy (SPRC; <i<n</i< = 108), single-port laparoscopic myomectomy (SPLM; <i<n</i< = 12), and single-port robotic myomectomy (SPRM; <i<n</i< = 56). The SPRH, SPRC, and SPRM groups had a shorter operation time than the SPLS group, although the results were not statistically significant (SPRH vs. SPLH, <i<p</i< = 0.134; SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.098; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.202). Incisional hernia occurred as a postoperative complication in two patients only in the SPLH group. Postoperative Hb changes were lower in the SPRC and SPRM groups than in the SPLC and SPLM groups (SPRC vs. SPLC, <i<p</i< = 0.023; SPRM vs. SPLM, <i<p</i< = 0.010). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port laparoscopic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">single-port robotic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">minimally invasive surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seon-Mi Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aeran Seol</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yun Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ki-Jin Ryu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sanghoon Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Tae Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Woong Cho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyung-Jin Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Hwa Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Kwan Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nak-Woo Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Personalized Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 2, p 205</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)71862713X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2662248-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20754426</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 205</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6a0a7d304c934f24a37be784ec05f01b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/2/205</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 205</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3994913

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?