Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases
Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment f...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
M. V. Gordeeva [verfasserIn] M. N. Lyapin [verfasserIn] T. A. Kostyukova [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Russisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Проблемы особо опасных инфекций - Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019, (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2020 ; number:4 ; pages:6-16 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ080460356 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ080460356 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413214906.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230310s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ080460356 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a rus | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RC109-216 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a M. V. Gordeeva |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a means of respiratory organs protection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pathogenic biological agents | |
| 650 | 4 | |a safety of works with pathogenic biological agents | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Infectious and parasitic diseases | |
| 700 | 0 | |a M. N. Lyapin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a T. A. Kostyukova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Проблемы особо опасных инфекций |d Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019 |g (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 |w (DE-627)176059234X |x 2658719X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g pages:6-16 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2020 |e 4 |h 6-16 | ||
| author_variant |
m v g mvg m n l mnl t a k tak |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:2658719X:2020----::enorsiaoyrasrtcinowrwtaet |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
RC |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080460356 (DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RC109-216 M. V. Gordeeva verfasserin aut Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. means of respiratory organs protection pathogenic biological agents safety of works with pathogenic biological agents Infectious and parasitic diseases M. N. Lyapin verfasserin aut T. A. Kostyukova verfasserin aut In Проблемы особо опасных инфекций Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019 (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 (DE-627)176059234X 2658719X nnns year:2020 number:4 pages:6-16 https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 kostenfrei https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 4 6-16 |
| spelling |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080460356 (DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RC109-216 M. V. Gordeeva verfasserin aut Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. means of respiratory organs protection pathogenic biological agents safety of works with pathogenic biological agents Infectious and parasitic diseases M. N. Lyapin verfasserin aut T. A. Kostyukova verfasserin aut In Проблемы особо опасных инфекций Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019 (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 (DE-627)176059234X 2658719X nnns year:2020 number:4 pages:6-16 https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 kostenfrei https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 4 6-16 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080460356 (DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RC109-216 M. V. Gordeeva verfasserin aut Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. means of respiratory organs protection pathogenic biological agents safety of works with pathogenic biological agents Infectious and parasitic diseases M. N. Lyapin verfasserin aut T. A. Kostyukova verfasserin aut In Проблемы особо опасных инфекций Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019 (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 (DE-627)176059234X 2658719X nnns year:2020 number:4 pages:6-16 https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 kostenfrei https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 4 6-16 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080460356 (DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RC109-216 M. V. Gordeeva verfasserin aut Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. means of respiratory organs protection pathogenic biological agents safety of works with pathogenic biological agents Infectious and parasitic diseases M. N. Lyapin verfasserin aut T. A. Kostyukova verfasserin aut In Проблемы особо опасных инфекций Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019 (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 (DE-627)176059234X 2658719X nnns year:2020 number:4 pages:6-16 https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 kostenfrei https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 4 6-16 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080460356 (DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus RC109-216 M. V. Gordeeva verfasserin aut Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. means of respiratory organs protection pathogenic biological agents safety of works with pathogenic biological agents Infectious and parasitic diseases M. N. Lyapin verfasserin aut T. A. Kostyukova verfasserin aut In Проблемы особо опасных инфекций Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019 (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 (DE-627)176059234X 2658719X nnns year:2020 number:4 pages:6-16 https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 kostenfrei https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2020 4 6-16 |
| language |
Russian |
| source |
In Проблемы особо опасных инфекций (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 year:2020 number:4 pages:6-16 |
| sourceStr |
In Проблемы особо опасных инфекций (2020), 4, Seite 6-16 year:2020 number:4 pages:6-16 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
means of respiratory organs protection pathogenic biological agents safety of works with pathogenic biological agents Infectious and parasitic diseases |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Проблемы особо опасных инфекций |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
M. V. Gordeeva @@aut@@ M. N. Lyapin @@aut@@ T. A. Kostyukova @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
176059234X |
| id |
DOAJ080460356 |
| language_de |
russisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080460356</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413214906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080460356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC109-216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. V. Gordeeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">means of respiratory organs protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pathogenic biological agents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">safety of works with pathogenic biological agents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Infectious and parasitic diseases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. N. Lyapin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T. A. Kostyukova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Проблемы особо опасных инфекций</subfield><subfield code="d">Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 4, Seite 6-16</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176059234X</subfield><subfield code="x">2658719X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6-16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">6-16</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
M. V. Gordeeva |
| spellingShingle |
M. V. Gordeeva misc RC109-216 misc means of respiratory organs protection misc pathogenic biological agents misc safety of works with pathogenic biological agents misc Infectious and parasitic diseases Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases |
| authorStr |
M. V. Gordeeva |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)176059234X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
RC109-216 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2658719X |
| topic_title |
RC109-216 Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases means of respiratory organs protection pathogenic biological agents safety of works with pathogenic biological agents |
| topic |
misc RC109-216 misc means of respiratory organs protection misc pathogenic biological agents misc safety of works with pathogenic biological agents misc Infectious and parasitic diseases |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc RC109-216 misc means of respiratory organs protection misc pathogenic biological agents misc safety of works with pathogenic biological agents misc Infectious and parasitic diseases |
| topic_browse |
misc RC109-216 misc means of respiratory organs protection misc pathogenic biological agents misc safety of works with pathogenic biological agents misc Infectious and parasitic diseases |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Проблемы особо опасных инфекций |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
176059234X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Проблемы особо опасных инфекций |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)176059234X |
| title |
Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ080460356 (DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 |
| title_full |
Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases |
| author_sort |
M. V. Gordeeva |
| journal |
Проблемы особо опасных инфекций |
| journalStr |
Проблемы особо опасных инфекций |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
rus |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
6 |
| author_browse |
M. V. Gordeeva M. N. Lyapin T. A. Kostyukova |
| class |
RC109-216 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
M. V. Gordeeva |
| doi_str_mv |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
means of respiratory organs protection for work with agents of infectious diseases |
| callnumber |
RC109-216 |
| title_auth |
Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases |
| abstract |
Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. |
| abstractGer |
Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9 https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209 https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069 https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
M. N. Lyapin T. A. Kostyukova |
| author2Str |
M. N. Lyapin T. A. Kostyukova |
| ppnlink |
176059234X |
| callnumber-subject |
RC - Internal Medicine |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16 |
| callnumber-a |
RC109-216 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:44:53.539Z |
| _version_ |
1803569482739744768 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080460356</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413214906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080460356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC109-216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. V. Gordeeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Means of Respiratory Organs Protection for Work with Agents of Infectious Diseases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diversity of currently available on the market means of respiratory organs protection (MROP) dictates the necessity to assess the specimens in regard to the possibility of using them for work with dangerous biological agents. The review presents the analysis of modern personal protection equipment for respiratory organs. National and inter-state standards, national legislative and normative documents, foreign recommendations, materials from periodicals, related to the matters of selection and usage of MROP, as well as information on the MROP models provided by manufacturers have been studied. Considered are different types and modifications of filtering MROP and applicable to them requirements. Peculiarities of MROP usage when working with agents of infectious diseases are also analyzed. Based on the conducted research, recommendations on the selection and exploitation of MROP for work with infectious diseases agents have been put forward, problematic aspects that require complex scientific-technical and regulatory solutions in order to ensure the safety of the personnel involved in handling infectious disease agents have been identified. The following conclusions are drawn: to protect the staff performing operations with harmful and dangerous biological agents, it is necessary to use MROP with anti-aerosol barriers; the choice of modification for specific situations and working conditions should be based on the results of assessment of biological hazard and associated risks. Peculiarities of the options, exploitation, and decontamination of MROP, actions in case of an accident related to the breaching of MROP integrity must be covered in the regulatory document at the institutional level, according to which an officer is obliged to receive introductory and recurring instructions. Enhancement of regulatory procedures in the sphere of biological safety provision should aim at clarification of legitimacy of using specific MROP for work with harmful and dangerous biological agents. Preferences in the choice of MROP for work with PBA have been pointed out.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">means of respiratory organs protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pathogenic biological agents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">safety of works with pathogenic biological agents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Infectious and parasitic diseases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. N. Lyapin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T. A. Kostyukova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Проблемы особо опасных инфекций</subfield><subfield code="d">Federal Government Health Institution, Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute “Microbe”, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 4, Seite 6-16</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176059234X</subfield><subfield code="x">2658719X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6-16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2019-4-6-16</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4724bd6e33ad488dbadf2036ca8e85b9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.microbe.ru/jour/article/view/1209</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0370-1069</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2658-719X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">6-16</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4016542 |