Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum)
Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
N V SINGH [verfasserIn] SHILPA PARASHURAM [verfasserIn] P ROOPASOWJANYA [verfasserIn] K D BABU [verfasserIn] D M MUNDEWADIKAR [verfasserIn] VIPUL SANGNURE [verfasserIn] JYOTSANA SHARMA [verfasserIn] R K PAL [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023, 90(2020), 4 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:90 ; year:2020 ; number:4 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ080484611 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ080484611 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230310191521.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230310s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ080484611 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a N V SINGH |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Micro-propagation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pomegranate | |
| 650 | 4 | |a PLW | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Planting material | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Agriculture | |
| 653 | 0 | |a S | |
| 700 | 0 | |a SHILPA PARASHURAM |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a P ROOPASOWJANYA |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a K D BABU |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a D M MUNDEWADIKAR |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a VIPUL SANGNURE |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a JYOTSANA SHARMA |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a R K PAL |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |d Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023 |g 90(2020), 4 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000156906 |x 23943319 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 90 |j 2020 |e 4 | ||
| author_variant |
n v s nvs s p sp p r pr k d b kdb d m m dmm v s vs j s js r k p rkp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23943319:2020----::efraceautoopatrietruhifrnpoaainehdip |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080484611 (DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng N V SINGH verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. Micro-propagation Pomegranate PLW Planting material Agriculture S SHILPA PARASHURAM verfasserin aut P ROOPASOWJANYA verfasserin aut K D BABU verfasserin aut D M MUNDEWADIKAR verfasserin aut VIPUL SANGNURE verfasserin aut JYOTSANA SHARMA verfasserin aut R K PAL verfasserin aut In The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023 90(2020), 4 (DE-627)DOAJ000156906 23943319 nnns volume:90 year:2020 number:4 https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b kostenfrei https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 90 2020 4 |
| spelling |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080484611 (DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng N V SINGH verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. Micro-propagation Pomegranate PLW Planting material Agriculture S SHILPA PARASHURAM verfasserin aut P ROOPASOWJANYA verfasserin aut K D BABU verfasserin aut D M MUNDEWADIKAR verfasserin aut VIPUL SANGNURE verfasserin aut JYOTSANA SHARMA verfasserin aut R K PAL verfasserin aut In The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023 90(2020), 4 (DE-627)DOAJ000156906 23943319 nnns volume:90 year:2020 number:4 https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b kostenfrei https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 90 2020 4 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080484611 (DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng N V SINGH verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. Micro-propagation Pomegranate PLW Planting material Agriculture S SHILPA PARASHURAM verfasserin aut P ROOPASOWJANYA verfasserin aut K D BABU verfasserin aut D M MUNDEWADIKAR verfasserin aut VIPUL SANGNURE verfasserin aut JYOTSANA SHARMA verfasserin aut R K PAL verfasserin aut In The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023 90(2020), 4 (DE-627)DOAJ000156906 23943319 nnns volume:90 year:2020 number:4 https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b kostenfrei https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 90 2020 4 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080484611 (DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng N V SINGH verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. Micro-propagation Pomegranate PLW Planting material Agriculture S SHILPA PARASHURAM verfasserin aut P ROOPASOWJANYA verfasserin aut K D BABU verfasserin aut D M MUNDEWADIKAR verfasserin aut VIPUL SANGNURE verfasserin aut JYOTSANA SHARMA verfasserin aut R K PAL verfasserin aut In The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023 90(2020), 4 (DE-627)DOAJ000156906 23943319 nnns volume:90 year:2020 number:4 https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b kostenfrei https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 90 2020 4 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080484611 (DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng N V SINGH verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. Micro-propagation Pomegranate PLW Planting material Agriculture S SHILPA PARASHURAM verfasserin aut P ROOPASOWJANYA verfasserin aut K D BABU verfasserin aut D M MUNDEWADIKAR verfasserin aut VIPUL SANGNURE verfasserin aut JYOTSANA SHARMA verfasserin aut R K PAL verfasserin aut In The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023 90(2020), 4 (DE-627)DOAJ000156906 23943319 nnns volume:90 year:2020 number:4 https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b kostenfrei https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 90 2020 4 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(2020), 4 volume:90 year:2020 number:4 |
| sourceStr |
In The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(2020), 4 volume:90 year:2020 number:4 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Micro-propagation Pomegranate PLW Planting material Agriculture S |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
N V SINGH @@aut@@ SHILPA PARASHURAM @@aut@@ P ROOPASOWJANYA @@aut@@ K D BABU @@aut@@ D M MUNDEWADIKAR @@aut@@ VIPUL SANGNURE @@aut@@ JYOTSANA SHARMA @@aut@@ R K PAL @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ000156906 |
| id |
DOAJ080484611 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080484611</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310191521.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080484611</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N V SINGH</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Micro-propagation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pomegranate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PLW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Planting material</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SHILPA PARASHURAM</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P ROOPASOWJANYA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K D BABU</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D M MUNDEWADIKAR</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIPUL SANGNURE</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JYOTSANA SHARMA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">R K PAL</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2020), 4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000156906</subfield><subfield code="x">23943319</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
N V SINGH |
| spellingShingle |
N V SINGH misc Micro-propagation misc Pomegranate misc PLW misc Planting material misc Agriculture misc S Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) |
| authorStr |
N V SINGH |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ000156906 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23943319 |
| topic_title |
Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) Micro-propagation Pomegranate PLW Planting material |
| topic |
misc Micro-propagation misc Pomegranate misc PLW misc Planting material misc Agriculture misc S |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Micro-propagation misc Pomegranate misc PLW misc Planting material misc Agriculture misc S |
| topic_browse |
misc Micro-propagation misc Pomegranate misc PLW misc Planting material misc Agriculture misc S |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ000156906 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ000156906 |
| title |
Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ080484611 (DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b |
| title_full |
Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) |
| author_sort |
N V SINGH |
| journal |
The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
| journalStr |
The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
N V SINGH SHILPA PARASHURAM P ROOPASOWJANYA K D BABU D M MUNDEWADIKAR VIPUL SANGNURE JYOTSANA SHARMA R K PAL |
| container_volume |
90 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
N V SINGH |
| doi_str_mv |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (punica granatum) |
| title_auth |
Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) |
| abstract |
Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. |
| abstractGer |
Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum) |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150 https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022 https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
SHILPA PARASHURAM P ROOPASOWJANYA K D BABU D M MUNDEWADIKAR VIPUL SANGNURE JYOTSANA SHARMA R K PAL |
| author2Str |
SHILPA PARASHURAM P ROOPASOWJANYA K D BABU D M MUNDEWADIKAR VIPUL SANGNURE JYOTSANA SHARMA R K PAL |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ000156906 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:52:54.229Z |
| _version_ |
1803569986790227968 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080484611</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310191521.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080484611</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N V SINGH</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance evaluation of plants raised through different propagation methods in pomegranate (Punica granatum)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Disease free and elite planting material propagated through in vitro propagation may prevent the spread of diseases particularly bacterial blight through infected planting material. However, there are certain misapprehensions about fruit quality of harvest from micro-propagated plants as compared to air layered or hardwood cutting raised plants. Keeping these facts under consideration, an elaborate study on comparative qualitative and quantitative evaluation of harvest from different types of planting material had been carried out during 2015-17 at ICAR-NRC on Pomegranate, Solapur. The terminal bearing non-significantly ranged from 25 to 28.30% across the different types of planting material. Fruit weight and aril to fruit ratio were found at par in harvest from the three types of planting material. Rind thickness and PLW, which generally play critical role in governing fruit shelf life, were also found at par in fruits from all the three types of planting materials. The rind to fruit ratio of fruits from hardwood cutting raised plants (0.41) was found significantly higher than air layered plants. The maximum ‘L*’ and ‘b*’ values of fresh fruits were recorded for fruits from air layered plants (60.76 and 31.65, respectively) and ‘a*’ value for fruits from TC raised plants (39.70). The results proved parity among fruit quality of harvests from different types of planting material in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Micro-propagation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pomegranate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PLW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Planting material</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SHILPA PARASHURAM</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">P ROOPASOWJANYA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K D BABU</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D M MUNDEWADIKAR</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIPUL SANGNURE</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JYOTSANA SHARMA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">R K PAL</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">90(2020), 4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000156906</subfield><subfield code="x">23943319</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:90</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i4.102150</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7c26cf12c5f643abb11e1c259fbf819b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/102150</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0019-5022</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2394-3319</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">90</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013557 |