Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty

This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 19...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Hester Helen [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Open Philosophy - De Gruyter, 2019, 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:6 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; pages:46-62

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ080958877

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ080958877
003	DE-627
005	20230310194710.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ080958877
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a B1-5802
100	0		\|a Hester Helen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture.
650		4	\|a social reproduction
650		4	\|a domestic labour
650		4	\|a technofeminism
650		4	\|a theories of work
650		4	\|a anti-work politics
650		4	\|a domestic architecture
653		0	\|a Philosophy (General)
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Open Philosophy \|d De Gruyter, 2019 \|g 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 \|w (DE-627)1026903599 \|w (DE-600)2935964-8 \|x 25438875 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:6 \|g year:2023 \|g number:1 \|g pages:46-62
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_603
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 6 \|j 2023 \|e 1 \|h 46-62

Indexfelder

author_variant	h h hh
matchkey_str	article:25438875:2023----::niokrhtcueoetcaorpcltvdsg
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
callnumber-subject-code	B
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080958877 (DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng B1-5802 Hester Helen verfasserin aut Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture. social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture Philosophy (General) In Open Philosophy De Gruyter, 2019 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 (DE-627)1026903599 (DE-600)2935964-8 25438875 nnns volume:6 year:2023 number:1 pages:46-62 https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_603 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2023 1 46-62
spelling	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080958877 (DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng B1-5802 Hester Helen verfasserin aut Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture. social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture Philosophy (General) In Open Philosophy De Gruyter, 2019 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 (DE-627)1026903599 (DE-600)2935964-8 25438875 nnns volume:6 year:2023 number:1 pages:46-62 https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_603 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2023 1 46-62
allfields_unstemmed	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080958877 (DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng B1-5802 Hester Helen verfasserin aut Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture. social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture Philosophy (General) In Open Philosophy De Gruyter, 2019 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 (DE-627)1026903599 (DE-600)2935964-8 25438875 nnns volume:6 year:2023 number:1 pages:46-62 https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_603 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2023 1 46-62
allfieldsGer	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080958877 (DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng B1-5802 Hester Helen verfasserin aut Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture. social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture Philosophy (General) In Open Philosophy De Gruyter, 2019 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 (DE-627)1026903599 (DE-600)2935964-8 25438875 nnns volume:6 year:2023 number:1 pages:46-62 https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_603 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2023 1 46-62
allfieldsSound	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 doi (DE-627)DOAJ080958877 (DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng B1-5802 Hester Helen verfasserin aut Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture. social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture Philosophy (General) In Open Philosophy De Gruyter, 2019 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 (DE-627)1026903599 (DE-600)2935964-8 25438875 nnns volume:6 year:2023 number:1 pages:46-62 https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_603 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2023 1 46-62
language	English
source	In Open Philosophy 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 volume:6 year:2023 number:1 pages:46-62
sourceStr	In Open Philosophy 6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62 volume:6 year:2023 number:1 pages:46-62
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture Philosophy (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Open Philosophy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Hester Helen @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1026903599
id	DOAJ080958877
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080958877</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310194710.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/opphil-2022-0226</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080958877</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hester Helen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic labour</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technofeminism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theories of work</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">anti-work politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic architecture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Open Philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1026903599</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2935964-8</subfield><subfield code="x">25438875</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:46-62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">46-62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion
author	Hester Helen
spellingShingle	Hester Helen misc B1-5802 misc social reproduction misc domestic labour misc technofeminism misc theories of work misc anti-work politics misc domestic architecture misc Philosophy (General) Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty
authorStr	Hester Helen
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1026903599
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	B1-5802
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	25438875
topic_title	B1-5802 Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty social reproduction domestic labour technofeminism theories of work anti-work politics domestic architecture
topic	misc B1-5802 misc social reproduction misc domestic labour misc technofeminism misc theories of work misc anti-work politics misc domestic architecture misc Philosophy (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc B1-5802 misc social reproduction misc domestic labour misc technofeminism misc theories of work misc anti-work politics misc domestic architecture misc Philosophy (General)
topic_browse	misc B1-5802 misc social reproduction misc domestic labour misc technofeminism misc theories of work misc anti-work politics misc domestic architecture misc Philosophy (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Open Philosophy
hierarchy_parent_id	1026903599
hierarchy_top_title	Open Philosophy
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1026903599 (DE-600)2935964-8
title	Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ080958877 (DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59
title_full	Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty
author_sort	Hester Helen
journal	Open Philosophy
journalStr	Open Philosophy
callnumber-first-code	B
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	46
author_browse	Hester Helen
container_volume	6
class	B1-5802
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Hester Helen
doi_str_mv	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226
title_sort	anti-work architecture: domestic labour, speculative design, and automated plenty
callnumber	B1-5802
title_auth	Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty
abstract	This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture.
abstractGer	This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture.
abstract_unstemmed	This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_603 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty
url	https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226 https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59 https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	1026903599
callnumber-subject	B - Philosophy
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1515/opphil-2022-0226
callnumber-a	B1-5802
up_date	2024-07-03T17:29:37.388Z
_version_	1803579846706593792
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ080958877</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310194710.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/opphil-2022-0226</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ080958877</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJda7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hester Helen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article presents a partial history of visions of technodomesticity in the global north, concentrating on dwellings which seek to problematize, challenge, or reorganize unpaid household labour. It is structured around three case studies, primarily drawn from the United States in the 1950s and 1960s: the single-family suburban dream house, the bachelor pad, and the fully automated future home. While these chosen examples may lend us certain resources for thinking about how best to mitigate the challenges of reproductive labour via living arrangements, they also possess a number of clear drawbacks or limitations. The article will argue that contesting these imaginaries (as much as learning from them) is likely to prove necessary in unpicking the connections between an inequitable distribution of unpaid intrafamilial domestic labour and the house itself as both a concrete site and an ideological formation – necessary, that is to say, in terms of building a meaningfully feminist conception of anti-work architecture.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic labour</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technofeminism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theories of work</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">anti-work politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">domestic architecture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Open Philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2023), 1, Seite 46-62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1026903599</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2935964-8</subfield><subfield code="x">25438875</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:46-62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/da7cd3ec99104d358f02afc367e9ae59</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0226</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">46-62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.39956

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Anti-Work Architecture: Domestic Labour, Speculative Design, and Automated Plenty

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?