RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE
The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of manageme...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen [verfasserIn] Obamiro John Kolade [verfasserIn] Tijani Abideen Adekunle [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series - Universitatea din Craiova, 2015, 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:2 ; year:2022 ; number:50 ; pages:93-109 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ081044143 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ081044143 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230310195206.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ081044143 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a HF5001-6182 | |
050 | 0 | |a HB1-3840 | |
100 | 0 | |a Shodiya Olayinka Abideen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. | ||
650 | 4 | |a research instrument | |
650 | 4 | |a reliability | |
650 | 4 | |a alternate-forms reliability | |
650 | 4 | |a inter-rater reliability | |
650 | 4 | |a internal consistency | |
650 | 4 | |a reliability coefficient | |
653 | 0 | |a Business | |
653 | 0 | |a Economic theory. Demography | |
700 | 0 | |a Obamiro John Kolade |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Tijani Abideen Adekunle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series |d Universitatea din Craiova, 2015 |g 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 |w (DE-627)597545685 |w (DE-600)2489244-0 |x 18433723 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2022 |g number:50 |g pages:93-109 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 2 |j 2022 |e 50 |h 93-109 |
author_variant |
s o a soa o j k ojk t a a taa |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18433723:2022----::eibltorsacisrmnsnaaeetcecseerh |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
HF |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ081044143 (DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 HB1-3840 Shodiya Olayinka Abideen verfasserin aut RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. research instrument reliability alternate-forms reliability inter-rater reliability internal consistency reliability coefficient Business Economic theory. Demography Obamiro John Kolade verfasserin aut Tijani Abideen Adekunle verfasserin aut In Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series Universitatea din Craiova, 2015 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 (DE-627)597545685 (DE-600)2489244-0 18433723 nnns volume:2 year:2022 number:50 pages:93-109 https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 kostenfrei http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2022 50 93-109 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ081044143 (DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 HB1-3840 Shodiya Olayinka Abideen verfasserin aut RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. research instrument reliability alternate-forms reliability inter-rater reliability internal consistency reliability coefficient Business Economic theory. Demography Obamiro John Kolade verfasserin aut Tijani Abideen Adekunle verfasserin aut In Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series Universitatea din Craiova, 2015 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 (DE-627)597545685 (DE-600)2489244-0 18433723 nnns volume:2 year:2022 number:50 pages:93-109 https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 kostenfrei http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2022 50 93-109 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ081044143 (DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 HB1-3840 Shodiya Olayinka Abideen verfasserin aut RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. research instrument reliability alternate-forms reliability inter-rater reliability internal consistency reliability coefficient Business Economic theory. Demography Obamiro John Kolade verfasserin aut Tijani Abideen Adekunle verfasserin aut In Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series Universitatea din Craiova, 2015 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 (DE-627)597545685 (DE-600)2489244-0 18433723 nnns volume:2 year:2022 number:50 pages:93-109 https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 kostenfrei http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2022 50 93-109 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ081044143 (DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 HB1-3840 Shodiya Olayinka Abideen verfasserin aut RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. research instrument reliability alternate-forms reliability inter-rater reliability internal consistency reliability coefficient Business Economic theory. Demography Obamiro John Kolade verfasserin aut Tijani Abideen Adekunle verfasserin aut In Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series Universitatea din Craiova, 2015 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 (DE-627)597545685 (DE-600)2489244-0 18433723 nnns volume:2 year:2022 number:50 pages:93-109 https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 kostenfrei http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2022 50 93-109 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ081044143 (DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 HB1-3840 Shodiya Olayinka Abideen verfasserin aut RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. research instrument reliability alternate-forms reliability inter-rater reliability internal consistency reliability coefficient Business Economic theory. Demography Obamiro John Kolade verfasserin aut Tijani Abideen Adekunle verfasserin aut In Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series Universitatea din Craiova, 2015 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 (DE-627)597545685 (DE-600)2489244-0 18433723 nnns volume:2 year:2022 number:50 pages:93-109 https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 kostenfrei http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2022 50 93-109 |
language |
English |
source |
In Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 volume:2 year:2022 number:50 pages:93-109 |
sourceStr |
In Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series 2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109 volume:2 year:2022 number:50 pages:93-109 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
research instrument reliability alternate-forms reliability inter-rater reliability internal consistency reliability coefficient Business Economic theory. Demography |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen @@aut@@ Obamiro John Kolade @@aut@@ Tijani Abideen Adekunle @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
597545685 |
id |
DOAJ081044143 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081044143</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310195206.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081044143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HF5001-6182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1-3840</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shodiya Olayinka Abideen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">research instrument</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alternate-forms reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inter-rater reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">internal consistency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reliability coefficient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic theory. Demography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Obamiro John Kolade</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tijani Abideen Adekunle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitatea din Craiova, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)597545685</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2489244-0</subfield><subfield code="x">18433723</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:50</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:93-109</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">50</subfield><subfield code="h">93-109</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
author |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen |
spellingShingle |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen misc HF5001-6182 misc HB1-3840 misc research instrument misc reliability misc alternate-forms reliability misc inter-rater reliability misc internal consistency misc reliability coefficient misc Business misc Economic theory. Demography RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE |
authorStr |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)597545685 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
HF5001-6182 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
18433723 |
topic_title |
HF5001-6182 HB1-3840 RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE research instrument reliability alternate-forms reliability inter-rater reliability internal consistency reliability coefficient |
topic |
misc HF5001-6182 misc HB1-3840 misc research instrument misc reliability misc alternate-forms reliability misc inter-rater reliability misc internal consistency misc reliability coefficient misc Business misc Economic theory. Demography |
topic_unstemmed |
misc HF5001-6182 misc HB1-3840 misc research instrument misc reliability misc alternate-forms reliability misc inter-rater reliability misc internal consistency misc reliability coefficient misc Business misc Economic theory. Demography |
topic_browse |
misc HF5001-6182 misc HB1-3840 misc research instrument misc reliability misc alternate-forms reliability misc inter-rater reliability misc internal consistency misc reliability coefficient misc Business misc Economic theory. Demography |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series |
hierarchy_parent_id |
597545685 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)597545685 (DE-600)2489244-0 |
title |
RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ081044143 (DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 |
title_full |
RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE |
author_sort |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen |
journal |
Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series |
journalStr |
Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series |
callnumber-first-code |
H |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
93 |
author_browse |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen Obamiro John Kolade Tijani Abideen Adekunle |
container_volume |
2 |
class |
HF5001-6182 HB1-3840 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Shodiya Olayinka Abideen |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
reliability of research instruments in management sciences research: an expository perspective |
callnumber |
HF5001-6182 |
title_auth |
RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE |
abstract |
The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. |
abstractGer |
The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
50 |
title_short |
RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6 http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Obamiro John Kolade Tijani Abideen Adekunle |
author2Str |
Obamiro John Kolade Tijani Abideen Adekunle |
ppnlink |
597545685 |
callnumber-subject |
HF - Commerce |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
HF5001-6182 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:00:11.550Z |
_version_ |
1803581769965895680 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081044143</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310195206.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081044143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HF5001-6182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1-3840</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shodiya Olayinka Abideen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RELIABILITY OF RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS IN MANAGEMENT SCIENCES RESEARCH: AN EXPOSITORY PERSPECTIVE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The reliability of test scores is the extent to which they are consistent across different occasions of testing, different editions of the test, or different raters scoring the test taker’s responses. Popular and commonly used reliability assessment approaches in Nigeria and in the field of management are the use of Cronbach alpha and Test-retest reliability tests for instrument reliability. Despite these, there are different types of reliabilities which are less reported in the field of management in the Nigeria academia. Based on this, the study reviewed various approaches and types of reliability test commonly utilised in Management sciences. The study used an exploratory research technique and relied on information from previous studies and publications, including journals, textbooks, periodicals, and the internet. The paper explored all of the pertinent concerns surrounding quantitative research instrument reliability and reviewed test reliability which include but not limited to: “alternate-forms reliability,” “inter-rater reliability,” “internal consistency,” “reliability coefficient,” “classification consistency,” with illustrations. It was concluded that reliability testing must be properly performed in order to do successful quantitative research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">research instrument</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alternate-forms reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inter-rater reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">internal consistency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reliability coefficient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic theory. Demography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Obamiro John Kolade</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tijani Abideen Adekunle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of the University of Craiova: Economic Sciences Series</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitatea din Craiova, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2022), 50, Seite 93-109</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)597545685</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2489244-0</subfield><subfield code="x">18433723</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:50</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:93-109</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/48d79341a68b4f5eb0f468a34da776e6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v2_2022/010.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1223-365X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1843-3723</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">50</subfield><subfield code="h">93-109</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399703 |