Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making
Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-maki...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova [verfasserIn] Roxana Ştefănescu [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Defence Science Review - Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021, (2022), 15, Seite 12 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2022 ; number:15 ; pages:12 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ081175310 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ081175310 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230310201923.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ081175310 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. | ||
650 | 4 | |a decision making | |
650 | 4 | |a decision-making process | |
650 | 4 | |a decisional options | |
650 | 4 | |a styles of decision making | |
650 | 4 | |a decision-making software | |
653 | 0 | |a Military Science | |
653 | 0 | |a U | |
700 | 0 | |a Roxana Ştefănescu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Defence Science Review |d Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021 |g (2022), 15, Seite 12 |w (DE-627)DOAJ078627915 |x 27196763 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2022 |g number:15 |g pages:12 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2022 |e 15 |h 12 |
author_variant |
e s p esp r ş rş |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:27196763:2022----::eiinaigoeniiuleiinaigtlsnsfw |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ081175310 (DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova verfasserin aut Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. decision making decision-making process decisional options styles of decision making decision-making software Military Science U Roxana Ştefănescu verfasserin aut In Defence Science Review Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021 (2022), 15, Seite 12 (DE-627)DOAJ078627915 27196763 nnns year:2022 number:15 pages:12 https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2022 15 12 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ081175310 (DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova verfasserin aut Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. decision making decision-making process decisional options styles of decision making decision-making software Military Science U Roxana Ştefănescu verfasserin aut In Defence Science Review Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021 (2022), 15, Seite 12 (DE-627)DOAJ078627915 27196763 nnns year:2022 number:15 pages:12 https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2022 15 12 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ081175310 (DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova verfasserin aut Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. decision making decision-making process decisional options styles of decision making decision-making software Military Science U Roxana Ştefănescu verfasserin aut In Defence Science Review Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021 (2022), 15, Seite 12 (DE-627)DOAJ078627915 27196763 nnns year:2022 number:15 pages:12 https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2022 15 12 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ081175310 (DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova verfasserin aut Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. decision making decision-making process decisional options styles of decision making decision-making software Military Science U Roxana Ştefănescu verfasserin aut In Defence Science Review Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021 (2022), 15, Seite 12 (DE-627)DOAJ078627915 27196763 nnns year:2022 number:15 pages:12 https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2022 15 12 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ081175310 (DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova verfasserin aut Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. decision making decision-making process decisional options styles of decision making decision-making software Military Science U Roxana Ştefănescu verfasserin aut In Defence Science Review Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021 (2022), 15, Seite 12 (DE-627)DOAJ078627915 27196763 nnns year:2022 number:15 pages:12 https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2022 15 12 |
language |
English |
source |
In Defence Science Review (2022), 15, Seite 12 year:2022 number:15 pages:12 |
sourceStr |
In Defence Science Review (2022), 15, Seite 12 year:2022 number:15 pages:12 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
decision making decision-making process decisional options styles of decision making decision-making software Military Science U |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Defence Science Review |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova @@aut@@ Roxana Ştefănescu @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ078627915 |
id |
DOAJ081175310 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081175310</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310201923.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081175310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decision-making process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decisional options</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">styles of decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decision-making software</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roxana Ştefănescu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Defence Science Review</subfield><subfield code="d">Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), 15, Seite 12</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078627915</subfield><subfield code="x">27196763</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:15</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">15</subfield><subfield code="h">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova |
spellingShingle |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova misc decision making misc decision-making process misc decisional options misc styles of decision making misc decision-making software misc Military Science misc U Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making |
authorStr |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ078627915 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
27196763 |
topic_title |
Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making decision making decision-making process decisional options styles of decision making decision-making software |
topic |
misc decision making misc decision-making process misc decisional options misc styles of decision making misc decision-making software misc Military Science misc U |
topic_unstemmed |
misc decision making misc decision-making process misc decisional options misc styles of decision making misc decision-making software misc Military Science misc U |
topic_browse |
misc decision making misc decision-making process misc decisional options misc styles of decision making misc decision-making software misc Military Science misc U |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Defence Science Review |
hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ078627915 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Defence Science Review |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ078627915 |
title |
Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ081175310 (DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d |
title_full |
Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making |
author_sort |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova |
journal |
Defence Science Review |
journalStr |
Defence Science Review |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
12 |
author_browse |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova Roxana Ştefănescu |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making |
title_auth |
Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making |
abstract |
Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. |
abstractGer |
Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
15 |
title_short |
Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making |
url |
https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919 https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869 https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Roxana Ştefănescu |
author2Str |
Roxana Ştefănescu |
ppnlink |
DOAJ078627915 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:41:01.844Z |
_version_ |
1803584339283279872 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081175310</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310201923.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081175310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elitsa Stoyanova Petrova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Decision making, some individual decision-making styles and software for decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: This article presents the eternal relevance of the decision-making process and its inseparable connection with the personality of the decision-maker. Broadly speaking, the subject of consideration is the decision-making process. The main goal of the authors is to review the decision-making process, some styles of decision making and offer information about some types of software for decision making and strategic planning. Methods: The scientific methodology used is a combination of a theoretical review of the issue, a critical scientific review and the presentation of new scientific advances in the world of practice in terms of decision-making through technical means and methods. Results: The conditions that the decisions must meet in order to be useful and accepted, some styles of decision-making processes and also the use of decision-making software are analysed in the article. Conclusions: The authors are aware that this is a repeatedly researched topic and it is in the last part that a novelty of an applied-practical nature is definitely found. Several software for decision making and strategic planning software, which is a category of software critical for organizational leaders who want to ensure more strategic decision-making and implement simpler and more effective reporting are presented in the last part of the article. This software provides a place to manage all strategic elements, in order to achieve high-level organizational structure and long-term goals.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decision-making process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decisional options</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">styles of decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">decision-making software</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Military Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roxana Ştefănescu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Defence Science Review</subfield><subfield code="d">Military University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), 15, Seite 12</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ078627915</subfield><subfield code="x">27196763</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:15</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.37055/pno/156919</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/53c6b87b38c741bcab43f9497df0158d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2450-6869</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2719-6763</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">15</subfield><subfield code="h">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399188 |