The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law
The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situ...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mahdi Shahabi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Persisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī - Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017, 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:2022 ; number:76 ; pages:215-246 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ081280106 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ081280106 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413195022.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||per c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ081280106 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a per | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KBP1-4860 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Mahdi Shahabi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a intuitive law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a léon petrazycki | |
| 650 | 4 | |a positive law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dynamic metaphysics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a natural law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a K | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Islamic law | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |d Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 |g 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000025194 |x 24766216 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2022 |g number:76 |g pages:215-246 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2022 |e 76 |h 215-246 | ||
| author_variant |
m s ms |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24766216:2022----::hitiieaolnerzcirniinrmesnnntroojcsomi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
KBP |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081280106 (DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 Mahdi Shahabi verfasserin aut The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. intuitive law léon petrazycki positive law dynamic metaphysics natural law Law K Islamic law In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 (DE-627)DOAJ000025194 24766216 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:76 pages:215-246 https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 kostenfrei https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2022 76 215-246 |
| spelling |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081280106 (DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 Mahdi Shahabi verfasserin aut The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. intuitive law léon petrazycki positive law dynamic metaphysics natural law Law K Islamic law In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 (DE-627)DOAJ000025194 24766216 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:76 pages:215-246 https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 kostenfrei https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2022 76 215-246 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081280106 (DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 Mahdi Shahabi verfasserin aut The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. intuitive law léon petrazycki positive law dynamic metaphysics natural law Law K Islamic law In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 (DE-627)DOAJ000025194 24766216 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:76 pages:215-246 https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 kostenfrei https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2022 76 215-246 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081280106 (DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 Mahdi Shahabi verfasserin aut The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. intuitive law léon petrazycki positive law dynamic metaphysics natural law Law K Islamic law In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 (DE-627)DOAJ000025194 24766216 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:76 pages:215-246 https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 kostenfrei https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2022 76 215-246 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081280106 (DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 Mahdi Shahabi verfasserin aut The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. intuitive law léon petrazycki positive law dynamic metaphysics natural law Law K Islamic law In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 (DE-627)DOAJ000025194 24766216 nnns volume:24 year:2022 number:76 pages:215-246 https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 kostenfrei https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 24 2022 76 215-246 |
| language |
Persian |
| source |
In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 volume:24 year:2022 number:76 pages:215-246 |
| sourceStr |
In Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī 24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246 volume:24 year:2022 number:76 pages:215-246 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
intuitive law léon petrazycki positive law dynamic metaphysics natural law Law K Islamic law |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mahdi Shahabi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ000025194 |
| id |
DOAJ081280106 |
| language_de |
persisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081280106</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413195022.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081280106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KBP1-4860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahdi Shahabi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intuitive law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">léon petrazycki</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dynamic metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">natural law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī</subfield><subfield code="d">Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000025194</subfield><subfield code="x">24766216</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:76</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:215-246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">76</subfield><subfield code="h">215-246</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| author |
Mahdi Shahabi |
| spellingShingle |
Mahdi Shahabi misc KBP1-4860 misc intuitive law misc léon petrazycki misc positive law misc dynamic metaphysics misc natural law misc Law misc K misc Islamic law The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law |
| authorStr |
Mahdi Shahabi |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ000025194 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
KBP1-4860 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24766216 |
| topic_title |
KBP1-4860 The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law intuitive law léon petrazycki positive law dynamic metaphysics natural law |
| topic |
misc KBP1-4860 misc intuitive law misc léon petrazycki misc positive law misc dynamic metaphysics misc natural law misc Law misc K misc Islamic law |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc KBP1-4860 misc intuitive law misc léon petrazycki misc positive law misc dynamic metaphysics misc natural law misc Law misc K misc Islamic law |
| topic_browse |
misc KBP1-4860 misc intuitive law misc léon petrazycki misc positive law misc dynamic metaphysics misc natural law misc Law misc K misc Islamic law |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ000025194 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ000025194 |
| title |
The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ081280106 (DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 |
| title_full |
The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law |
| author_sort |
Mahdi Shahabi |
| journal |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |
| journalStr |
Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī |
| callnumber-first-code |
K |
| lang_code |
per |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
215 |
| author_browse |
Mahdi Shahabi |
| container_volume |
24 |
| class |
KBP1-4860 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mahdi Shahabi |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 |
| title_sort |
intuitive law of léon petrazycki: transition from reason and nature of objects to empirical intuition as validity of law |
| callnumber |
KBP1-4860 |
| title_auth |
The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law |
| abstract |
The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. |
| abstractGer |
The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
76 |
| title_short |
The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7 https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116 https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ000025194 |
| callnumber-subject |
KBP - Islamic Law |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651 |
| callnumber-a |
KBP1-4860 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:14:11.991Z |
| _version_ |
1803586426100514817 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081280106</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413195022.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081280106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KBP1-4860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahdi Shahabi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The history of the evolution of legal thought indicates the contentious process of the interaction between metaphysics and reality. Meanwhile, notions such as law and justice, and in general, natural law, being the criterion for evaluating justice in the legal structure, have a more complicated situation. Petrazyski's idea on intuitive law should be considered as a new framework for the mentioned interaction; as modern natural law is based on the preeminence of metaphysical rule over reality, and classical natural law also seeks static metaphysics to provide the ground for its interaction with reality. Thus, they could not be admissible. Petrazycki endeavors to seek a dynamic metaphysics which he finds it in dynamic subjectivism. Individual intuition is another expression of this type of subjectivism which leads to the intuitive right and intuitive justice. However, one may ask whether this type of metaphysics be the foundation and even superior and evolutionary framework of law? In fact, Petraziski does not believe in such a foundation, and as a result, his metaphysical interaction with reality cannot be maintained in the framework of idealism.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intuitive law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">léon petrazycki</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dynamic metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">natural law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Faṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish-i Huqūq-i ̒Umūmī</subfield><subfield code="d">Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2022), 76, Seite 215-246</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000025194</subfield><subfield code="x">24766216</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:76</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:215-246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62722.2651</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5043bb1b44944781b7b7fac9e4ec41a7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_14957_113c2c5f17cb9758440a09a932df7b7f.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2345-6116</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6216</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">76</subfield><subfield code="h">215-246</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397566 |