Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples

‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via m...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	László Sándor Koncz [verfasserIn] Marietta Petróczy [verfasserIn] Béla Pénzes [verfasserIn] Márta Ladányi [verfasserIn] László Palkovics [verfasserIn] Piroska Gyócsi [verfasserIn] Géza Nagy [verfasserIn] János Ágoston [verfasserIn] József Fail [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Agronomy - MDPI AG, 2012, 13(2023), 1, p 199
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:13 ; year:2023 ; number:1, p 199

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/agronomy13010199

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ081954565

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ081954565
003	DE-627
005	20240414140513.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/agronomy13010199 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ081954565
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a László Sándor Koncz \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation.
650		4	\|a plum psyllid
650		4	\|a hawthorn psyllid
650		4	\|a ITS2
650		4	\|a COI
650		4	\|a phylogenetic comparison
650		4	\|a ESFY
653		0	\|a Agriculture
653		0	\|a S
700	0		\|a Marietta Petróczy \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Béla Pénzes \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Márta Ladányi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a László Palkovics \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Piroska Gyócsi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Géza Nagy \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a János Ágoston \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a József Fail \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Agronomy \|d MDPI AG, 2012 \|g 13(2023), 1, p 199 \|w (DE-627)658000543 \|w (DE-600)2607043-1 \|x 20734395 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:13 \|g year:2023 \|g number:1, p 199
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 13 \|j 2023 \|e 1, p 199

Indexfelder

author_variant	l s k lsk m p mp b p bp m l ml l p lp p g pg g n gn j á já j f jf
matchkey_str	article:20734395:2023----::eetooiaddtspyhpampuouiarctreadt
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.3390/agronomy13010199 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081954565 (DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng László Sándor Koncz verfasserin aut Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation. plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY Agriculture S Marietta Petróczy verfasserin aut Béla Pénzes verfasserin aut Márta Ladányi verfasserin aut László Palkovics verfasserin aut Piroska Gyócsi verfasserin aut Géza Nagy verfasserin aut János Ágoston verfasserin aut József Fail verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 1, p 199 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1, p 199 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1, p 199
spelling	10.3390/agronomy13010199 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081954565 (DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng László Sándor Koncz verfasserin aut Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation. plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY Agriculture S Marietta Petróczy verfasserin aut Béla Pénzes verfasserin aut Márta Ladányi verfasserin aut László Palkovics verfasserin aut Piroska Gyócsi verfasserin aut Géza Nagy verfasserin aut János Ágoston verfasserin aut József Fail verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 1, p 199 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1, p 199 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1, p 199
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/agronomy13010199 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081954565 (DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng László Sándor Koncz verfasserin aut Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation. plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY Agriculture S Marietta Petróczy verfasserin aut Béla Pénzes verfasserin aut Márta Ladányi verfasserin aut László Palkovics verfasserin aut Piroska Gyócsi verfasserin aut Géza Nagy verfasserin aut János Ágoston verfasserin aut József Fail verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 1, p 199 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1, p 199 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1, p 199
allfieldsGer	10.3390/agronomy13010199 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081954565 (DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng László Sándor Koncz verfasserin aut Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation. plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY Agriculture S Marietta Petróczy verfasserin aut Béla Pénzes verfasserin aut Márta Ladányi verfasserin aut László Palkovics verfasserin aut Piroska Gyócsi verfasserin aut Géza Nagy verfasserin aut János Ágoston verfasserin aut József Fail verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 1, p 199 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1, p 199 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1, p 199
allfieldsSound	10.3390/agronomy13010199 doi (DE-627)DOAJ081954565 (DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng László Sándor Koncz verfasserin aut Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation. plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY Agriculture S Marietta Petróczy verfasserin aut Béla Pénzes verfasserin aut Márta Ladányi verfasserin aut László Palkovics verfasserin aut Piroska Gyócsi verfasserin aut Géza Nagy verfasserin aut János Ágoston verfasserin aut József Fail verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 1, p 199 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1, p 199 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1, p 199
language	English
source	In Agronomy 13(2023), 1, p 199 volume:13 year:2023 number:1, p 199
sourceStr	In Agronomy 13(2023), 1, p 199 volume:13 year:2023 number:1, p 199
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY Agriculture S
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Agronomy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	László Sándor Koncz @@aut@@ Marietta Petróczy @@aut@@ Béla Pénzes @@aut@@ Márta Ladányi @@aut@@ László Palkovics @@aut@@ Piroska Gyócsi @@aut@@ Géza Nagy @@aut@@ János Ágoston @@aut@@ József Fail @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	658000543
id	DOAJ081954565
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081954565</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414140513.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy13010199</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081954565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">László Sándor Koncz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plum psyllid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hawthorn psyllid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ITS2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">COI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">phylogenetic comparison</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ESFY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marietta Petróczy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Béla Pénzes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Márta Ladányi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">László Palkovics</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piroska Gyócsi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Géza Nagy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">János Ágoston</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">József Fail</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 1, p 199</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 199</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 199</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	László Sándor Koncz
spellingShingle	László Sándor Koncz misc plum psyllid misc hawthorn psyllid misc ITS2 misc COI misc phylogenetic comparison misc ESFY misc Agriculture misc S Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples
authorStr	László Sándor Koncz
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)658000543
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20734395
topic_title	Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples plum psyllid hawthorn psyllid ITS2 COI phylogenetic comparison ESFY
topic	misc plum psyllid misc hawthorn psyllid misc ITS2 misc COI misc phylogenetic comparison misc ESFY misc Agriculture misc S
topic_unstemmed	misc plum psyllid misc hawthorn psyllid misc ITS2 misc COI misc phylogenetic comparison misc ESFY misc Agriculture misc S
topic_browse	misc plum psyllid misc hawthorn psyllid misc ITS2 misc COI misc phylogenetic comparison misc ESFY misc Agriculture misc S
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Agronomy
hierarchy_parent_id	658000543
hierarchy_top_title	Agronomy
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1
title	Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ081954565 (DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd
title_full	Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples
author_sort	László Sándor Koncz
journal	Agronomy
journalStr	Agronomy
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	László Sándor Koncz Marietta Petróczy Béla Pénzes Márta Ladányi László Palkovics Piroska Gyócsi Géza Nagy János Ágoston József Fail
container_volume	13
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	László Sándor Koncz
doi_str_mv	10.3390/agronomy13010199
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	detection of ‘<i<candidatus</i< phythoplasma prunorum’ in apricot trees and its associated psyllid samples
title_auth	Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples
abstract	‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation.
abstractGer	‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation.
abstract_unstemmed	‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1, p 199
title_short	Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199 https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395
remote_bool	true
author2	Marietta Petróczy Béla Pénzes Márta Ladányi László Palkovics Piroska Gyócsi Géza Nagy János Ágoston József Fail
author2Str	Marietta Petróczy Béla Pénzes Márta Ladányi László Palkovics Piroska Gyócsi Géza Nagy János Ágoston József Fail
ppnlink	658000543
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/agronomy13010199
up_date	2024-07-03T22:49:02.619Z
_version_	1803599942904709120
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ081954565</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414140513.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230310s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy13010199</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ081954565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">László Sándor Koncz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’ is causing ever increasing economic losses through the decline of apricot trees in European countries, e.g., Hungary. In this study, the pathogen was identified from plant tissues and insects by nested-PCR. The insect species were identified via morphology and molecular methods. The incidence of the pathogen was 29.6% in randomly selected apricot trees. Most of the infected trees with symptoms died within a year. These results show that phytoplasma is significantly present and causes damage in the investigated plantations. The only known insect vector of this phytoplasma is the plum psyllid, <i<Cacopsylla pruni</i<, which was regularly encountered in the sampled apricot orchards and in their surroundings. In a two-year study, several adults among the sampled specimens were observed to be infected by the pathogen. This observation further confirms the role of the plum psyllid in vectoring the phytoplasma. All the sampled plum psyllid adults belonged to the ‘B’ biotype. Besides <i<C. pruni</i<, <i<Cacopsylla crataegi</i< was abundant in the samples. Several adults of the latter species were also infected by the pathogen ‘<i<Ca.</i< Phytoplasma prunorum’. The rates of occurrence of this phytoplasma in male and female adults of the two psyllid species appeared to be similar. The examined <i<C. crataegi</i< individuals showed genetic differences from each other and from specimens included in a previous investigation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plum psyllid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hawthorn psyllid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ITS2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">COI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">phylogenetic comparison</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ESFY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marietta Petróczy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Béla Pénzes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Márta Ladányi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">László Palkovics</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Piroska Gyócsi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Géza Nagy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">János Ágoston</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">József Fail</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 1, p 199</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 199</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010199</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8d313b5baede455786023dd6ac917bdd</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/1/199</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 199</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400667

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Detection of ‘<i<Candidatus</i< Phythoplasma prunorum’ in Apricot Trees and its Associated Psyllid Samples

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?