Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series
<b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parie...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Elena Virginia Colombo [verfasserIn] Daniele Bongetta [verfasserIn] Fabio Cofano [verfasserIn] Alessandro Versace [verfasserIn] Diego Garbossa [verfasserIn] Alessandro Bertuccio [verfasserIn] Daniele Armocida [verfasserIn] Patrizia d’Auria [verfasserIn] Lisa Maria Farina [verfasserIn] Roberto Assietti [verfasserIn] Fulvio Tartara [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Surgeries - MDPI AG, 2020, 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2022 ; number:4 ; pages:314-322 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ082975698 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ082975698 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414145806.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/surgeries3040034 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ082975698 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RD1-811 | |
100 | 0 | |a Elena Virginia Colombo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a <b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. | ||
650 | 4 | |a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt | |
650 | 4 | |a communicating hydrocephalus | |
650 | 4 | |a ventricular landmark | |
650 | 4 | |a shunt infection | |
650 | 4 | |a shunt revision surgery | |
653 | 0 | |a Surgery | |
700 | 0 | |a Daniele Bongetta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Fabio Cofano |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Alessandro Versace |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Diego Garbossa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Alessandro Bertuccio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Daniele Armocida |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Patrizia d’Auria |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Lisa Maria Farina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Roberto Assietti |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Fulvio Tartara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Surgeries |d MDPI AG, 2020 |g 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 |w (DE-627)1698224338 |x 26734095 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g pages:314-322 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 3 |j 2022 |e 4 |h 314-322 |
author_variant |
e v c evc d b db f c fc a v av d g dg a b ab d a da p d pd l m f lmf r a ra f t ft |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:26734095:2022----::etiuaprtnasutnuigoiidenpitprahehi |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RD |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 doi (DE-627)DOAJ082975698 (DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Elena Virginia Colombo verfasserin aut Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. ventriculo-peritoneal shunt communicating hydrocephalus ventricular landmark shunt infection shunt revision surgery Surgery Daniele Bongetta verfasserin aut Fabio Cofano verfasserin aut Alessandro Versace verfasserin aut Diego Garbossa verfasserin aut Alessandro Bertuccio verfasserin aut Daniele Armocida verfasserin aut Patrizia d’Auria verfasserin aut Lisa Maria Farina verfasserin aut Roberto Assietti verfasserin aut Fulvio Tartara verfasserin aut In Surgeries MDPI AG, 2020 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 (DE-627)1698224338 26734095 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:4 pages:314-322 https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 4 314-322 |
spelling |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 doi (DE-627)DOAJ082975698 (DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Elena Virginia Colombo verfasserin aut Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. ventriculo-peritoneal shunt communicating hydrocephalus ventricular landmark shunt infection shunt revision surgery Surgery Daniele Bongetta verfasserin aut Fabio Cofano verfasserin aut Alessandro Versace verfasserin aut Diego Garbossa verfasserin aut Alessandro Bertuccio verfasserin aut Daniele Armocida verfasserin aut Patrizia d’Auria verfasserin aut Lisa Maria Farina verfasserin aut Roberto Assietti verfasserin aut Fulvio Tartara verfasserin aut In Surgeries MDPI AG, 2020 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 (DE-627)1698224338 26734095 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:4 pages:314-322 https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 4 314-322 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 doi (DE-627)DOAJ082975698 (DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Elena Virginia Colombo verfasserin aut Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. ventriculo-peritoneal shunt communicating hydrocephalus ventricular landmark shunt infection shunt revision surgery Surgery Daniele Bongetta verfasserin aut Fabio Cofano verfasserin aut Alessandro Versace verfasserin aut Diego Garbossa verfasserin aut Alessandro Bertuccio verfasserin aut Daniele Armocida verfasserin aut Patrizia d’Auria verfasserin aut Lisa Maria Farina verfasserin aut Roberto Assietti verfasserin aut Fulvio Tartara verfasserin aut In Surgeries MDPI AG, 2020 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 (DE-627)1698224338 26734095 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:4 pages:314-322 https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 4 314-322 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 doi (DE-627)DOAJ082975698 (DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Elena Virginia Colombo verfasserin aut Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. ventriculo-peritoneal shunt communicating hydrocephalus ventricular landmark shunt infection shunt revision surgery Surgery Daniele Bongetta verfasserin aut Fabio Cofano verfasserin aut Alessandro Versace verfasserin aut Diego Garbossa verfasserin aut Alessandro Bertuccio verfasserin aut Daniele Armocida verfasserin aut Patrizia d’Auria verfasserin aut Lisa Maria Farina verfasserin aut Roberto Assietti verfasserin aut Fulvio Tartara verfasserin aut In Surgeries MDPI AG, 2020 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 (DE-627)1698224338 26734095 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:4 pages:314-322 https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 4 314-322 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 doi (DE-627)DOAJ082975698 (DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Elena Virginia Colombo verfasserin aut Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. ventriculo-peritoneal shunt communicating hydrocephalus ventricular landmark shunt infection shunt revision surgery Surgery Daniele Bongetta verfasserin aut Fabio Cofano verfasserin aut Alessandro Versace verfasserin aut Diego Garbossa verfasserin aut Alessandro Bertuccio verfasserin aut Daniele Armocida verfasserin aut Patrizia d’Auria verfasserin aut Lisa Maria Farina verfasserin aut Roberto Assietti verfasserin aut Fulvio Tartara verfasserin aut In Surgeries MDPI AG, 2020 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 (DE-627)1698224338 26734095 nnns volume:3 year:2022 number:4 pages:314-322 https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2022 4 314-322 |
language |
English |
source |
In Surgeries 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 volume:3 year:2022 number:4 pages:314-322 |
sourceStr |
In Surgeries 3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322 volume:3 year:2022 number:4 pages:314-322 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
ventriculo-peritoneal shunt communicating hydrocephalus ventricular landmark shunt infection shunt revision surgery Surgery |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Surgeries |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Elena Virginia Colombo @@aut@@ Daniele Bongetta @@aut@@ Fabio Cofano @@aut@@ Alessandro Versace @@aut@@ Diego Garbossa @@aut@@ Alessandro Bertuccio @@aut@@ Daniele Armocida @@aut@@ Patrizia d’Auria @@aut@@ Lisa Maria Farina @@aut@@ Roberto Assietti @@aut@@ Fulvio Tartara @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1698224338 |
id |
DOAJ082975698 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ082975698</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414145806.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/surgeries3040034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ082975698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD1-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elena Virginia Colombo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ventriculo-peritoneal shunt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">communicating hydrocephalus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ventricular landmark</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shunt infection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shunt revision surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Bongetta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fabio Cofano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alessandro Versace</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diego Garbossa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alessandro Bertuccio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Armocida</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patrizia d’Auria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lisa Maria Farina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roberto Assietti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fulvio Tartara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Surgeries</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1698224338</subfield><subfield code="x">26734095</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:314-322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">314-322</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Elena Virginia Colombo |
spellingShingle |
Elena Virginia Colombo misc RD1-811 misc ventriculo-peritoneal shunt misc communicating hydrocephalus misc ventricular landmark misc shunt infection misc shunt revision surgery misc Surgery Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series |
authorStr |
Elena Virginia Colombo |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1698224338 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RD1-811 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
26734095 |
topic_title |
RD1-811 Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series ventriculo-peritoneal shunt communicating hydrocephalus ventricular landmark shunt infection shunt revision surgery |
topic |
misc RD1-811 misc ventriculo-peritoneal shunt misc communicating hydrocephalus misc ventricular landmark misc shunt infection misc shunt revision surgery misc Surgery |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RD1-811 misc ventriculo-peritoneal shunt misc communicating hydrocephalus misc ventricular landmark misc shunt infection misc shunt revision surgery misc Surgery |
topic_browse |
misc RD1-811 misc ventriculo-peritoneal shunt misc communicating hydrocephalus misc ventricular landmark misc shunt infection misc shunt revision surgery misc Surgery |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Surgeries |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1698224338 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Surgeries |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1698224338 |
title |
Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ082975698 (DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 |
title_full |
Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series |
author_sort |
Elena Virginia Colombo |
journal |
Surgeries |
journalStr |
Surgeries |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
314 |
author_browse |
Elena Virginia Colombo Daniele Bongetta Fabio Cofano Alessandro Versace Diego Garbossa Alessandro Bertuccio Daniele Armocida Patrizia d’Auria Lisa Maria Farina Roberto Assietti Fulvio Tartara |
container_volume |
3 |
class |
RD1-811 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Elena Virginia Colombo |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
ventricular peritoneal shunting using modified keen’s point approach: technical report and cases series |
callnumber |
RD1-811 |
title_auth |
Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series |
abstract |
<b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. |
abstractGer |
<b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. |
abstract_unstemmed |
<b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034 https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4 https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34 https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Daniele Bongetta Fabio Cofano Alessandro Versace Diego Garbossa Alessandro Bertuccio Daniele Armocida Patrizia d’Auria Lisa Maria Farina Roberto Assietti Fulvio Tartara |
author2Str |
Daniele Bongetta Fabio Cofano Alessandro Versace Diego Garbossa Alessandro Bertuccio Daniele Armocida Patrizia d’Auria Lisa Maria Farina Roberto Assietti Fulvio Tartara |
ppnlink |
1698224338 |
callnumber-subject |
RD - Surgery |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/surgeries3040034 |
callnumber-a |
RD1-811 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:50:59.386Z |
_version_ |
1803569866356031489 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ082975698</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414145806.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/surgeries3040034</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ082975698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD1-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elena Virginia Colombo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ventricular Peritoneal Shunting Using Modified Keen’s Point Approach: Technical Report and Cases Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><b<Background:</b< Ventricular peritoneal shunting (VPS) is a frequent procedure in neurosurgery, unfortunately still burdened with a significant rate of complications. The frontal Kocher’s point is the most frequently used landmark for ventricular puncture. Keen’s point (posterior parietal approach) seems to be a valid alternative. We report a newly described access to the lateral ventricle located in posterior temporal area and the results of a large series of adult patients. <b<Methods:</b< Retrospective analysis of a series of 188 cases of VPS performed with this approach. <b<Results:</b< Mean surgical time was 51.5 +/− 13.1 min (range 25–90 min). Twenty-one patients (11.2%) were subjected to revision surgery: eight cases (4.3%) for displacement or malfunction of ventricular catheter, eight cases (4.3%) for abdominal issues, three cases (1.6%) for hardware failure, and two cases (1.1%) for infection. Optimal catheter placement was reached in 90.1%. <b<Conclusions:</b< The modified Keen’s point approach seems to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, showing some potential advantages such as short surgical time, precision in ventricular catheter placement, and short tunneling tract. The need for surgical revision is similar to that reported in the literature, while the rate of catheter malpositioning and infections seems to be low; hemorrhages around catheter and seizures were not reported.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ventriculo-peritoneal shunt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">communicating hydrocephalus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ventricular landmark</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shunt infection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shunt revision surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Bongetta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fabio Cofano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alessandro Versace</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diego Garbossa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alessandro Bertuccio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniele Armocida</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Patrizia d’Auria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lisa Maria Farina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roberto Assietti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fulvio Tartara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Surgeries</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2022), 4, Seite 314-322</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1698224338</subfield><subfield code="x">26734095</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:314-322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040034</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1de3a1d769794e9d84aefdf6823f5ac4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4095/3/4/34</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2673-4095</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">314-322</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4002895 |