Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty
Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, bas...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
K. I. Melkonian [verfasserIn] K. I. Popandopulo [verfasserIn] S. B. Bazlov [verfasserIn] T. V. Rusinova [verfasserIn] O. A. Moskalyuk [verfasserIn] I. M. Bykov [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Russisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Кубанский научный медицинский вестник - Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019, 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:29 ; year:2022 ; number:5 ; pages:94-107 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ084162066 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ084162066 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414040943.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ084162066 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a rus | ||
100 | 0 | |a K. I. Melkonian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. | ||
650 | 4 | |a hernioplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a acellular dermal matrix | |
650 | 4 | |a ventral hernia | |
650 | 4 | |a biological implant | |
650 | 4 | |a abdominal wall reconstruction | |
650 | 4 | |a surgical fabrics | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
700 | 0 | |a K. I. Popandopulo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a S. B. Bazlov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a T. V. Rusinova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a O. A. Moskalyuk |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a I. M. Bykov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Кубанский научный медицинский вестник |d Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019 |g 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 |w (DE-627)176060979X |x 25419544 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g pages:94-107 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 29 |j 2022 |e 5 |h 94-107 |
author_variant |
k i m kim k i p kip s b b sbb t v r tvr o a m oam i m b imb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:25419544:2022----::oprtveautooboehnclhrceitcoaellrem |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084162066 (DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus K. I. Melkonian verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. hernioplasty acellular dermal matrix ventral hernia biological implant abdominal wall reconstruction surgical fabrics Medicine R K. I. Popandopulo verfasserin aut S. B. Bazlov verfasserin aut T. V. Rusinova verfasserin aut O. A. Moskalyuk verfasserin aut I. M. Bykov verfasserin aut In Кубанский научный медицинский вестник Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 (DE-627)176060979X 25419544 nnns volume:29 year:2022 number:5 pages:94-107 https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 kostenfrei https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2022 5 94-107 |
spelling |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084162066 (DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus K. I. Melkonian verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. hernioplasty acellular dermal matrix ventral hernia biological implant abdominal wall reconstruction surgical fabrics Medicine R K. I. Popandopulo verfasserin aut S. B. Bazlov verfasserin aut T. V. Rusinova verfasserin aut O. A. Moskalyuk verfasserin aut I. M. Bykov verfasserin aut In Кубанский научный медицинский вестник Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 (DE-627)176060979X 25419544 nnns volume:29 year:2022 number:5 pages:94-107 https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 kostenfrei https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2022 5 94-107 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084162066 (DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus K. I. Melkonian verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. hernioplasty acellular dermal matrix ventral hernia biological implant abdominal wall reconstruction surgical fabrics Medicine R K. I. Popandopulo verfasserin aut S. B. Bazlov verfasserin aut T. V. Rusinova verfasserin aut O. A. Moskalyuk verfasserin aut I. M. Bykov verfasserin aut In Кубанский научный медицинский вестник Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 (DE-627)176060979X 25419544 nnns volume:29 year:2022 number:5 pages:94-107 https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 kostenfrei https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2022 5 94-107 |
allfieldsGer |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084162066 (DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus K. I. Melkonian verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. hernioplasty acellular dermal matrix ventral hernia biological implant abdominal wall reconstruction surgical fabrics Medicine R K. I. Popandopulo verfasserin aut S. B. Bazlov verfasserin aut T. V. Rusinova verfasserin aut O. A. Moskalyuk verfasserin aut I. M. Bykov verfasserin aut In Кубанский научный медицинский вестник Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 (DE-627)176060979X 25419544 nnns volume:29 year:2022 number:5 pages:94-107 https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 kostenfrei https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2022 5 94-107 |
allfieldsSound |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084162066 (DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus K. I. Melkonian verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. hernioplasty acellular dermal matrix ventral hernia biological implant abdominal wall reconstruction surgical fabrics Medicine R K. I. Popandopulo verfasserin aut S. B. Bazlov verfasserin aut T. V. Rusinova verfasserin aut O. A. Moskalyuk verfasserin aut I. M. Bykov verfasserin aut In Кубанский научный медицинский вестник Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 (DE-627)176060979X 25419544 nnns volume:29 year:2022 number:5 pages:94-107 https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 kostenfrei https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2022 5 94-107 |
language |
Russian |
source |
In Кубанский научный медицинский вестник 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 volume:29 year:2022 number:5 pages:94-107 |
sourceStr |
In Кубанский научный медицинский вестник 29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107 volume:29 year:2022 number:5 pages:94-107 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
hernioplasty acellular dermal matrix ventral hernia biological implant abdominal wall reconstruction surgical fabrics Medicine R |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Кубанский научный медицинский вестник |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
K. I. Melkonian @@aut@@ K. I. Popandopulo @@aut@@ S. B. Bazlov @@aut@@ T. V. Rusinova @@aut@@ O. A. Moskalyuk @@aut@@ I. M. Bykov @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
176060979X |
id |
DOAJ084162066 |
language_de |
russisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ084162066</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414040943.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ084162066</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. I. Melkonian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hernioplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acellular dermal matrix</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ventral hernia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">biological implant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">abdominal wall reconstruction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">surgical fabrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. I. Popandopulo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. B. Bazlov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T. V. Rusinova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O. A. Moskalyuk</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I. M. Bykov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Кубанский научный медицинский вестник</subfield><subfield code="d">Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176060979X</subfield><subfield code="x">25419544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:94-107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">94-107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
K. I. Melkonian |
spellingShingle |
K. I. Melkonian misc hernioplasty misc acellular dermal matrix misc ventral hernia misc biological implant misc abdominal wall reconstruction misc surgical fabrics misc Medicine misc R Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty |
authorStr |
K. I. Melkonian |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)176060979X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
25419544 |
topic_title |
Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty hernioplasty acellular dermal matrix ventral hernia biological implant abdominal wall reconstruction surgical fabrics |
topic |
misc hernioplasty misc acellular dermal matrix misc ventral hernia misc biological implant misc abdominal wall reconstruction misc surgical fabrics misc Medicine misc R |
topic_unstemmed |
misc hernioplasty misc acellular dermal matrix misc ventral hernia misc biological implant misc abdominal wall reconstruction misc surgical fabrics misc Medicine misc R |
topic_browse |
misc hernioplasty misc acellular dermal matrix misc ventral hernia misc biological implant misc abdominal wall reconstruction misc surgical fabrics misc Medicine misc R |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Кубанский научный медицинский вестник |
hierarchy_parent_id |
176060979X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Кубанский научный медицинский вестник |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)176060979X |
title |
Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ084162066 (DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 |
title_full |
Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty |
author_sort |
K. I. Melkonian |
journal |
Кубанский научный медицинский вестник |
journalStr |
Кубанский научный медицинский вестник |
lang_code |
rus |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
94 |
author_browse |
K. I. Melkonian K. I. Popandopulo S. B. Bazlov T. V. Rusinova O. A. Moskalyuk I. M. Bykov |
container_volume |
29 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
K. I. Melkonian |
doi_str_mv |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
comparative evaluation of biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix for hernioplasty |
title_auth |
Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty |
abstract |
Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. |
abstractGer |
Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty |
url |
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141 https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929 https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228 https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
K. I. Popandopulo S. B. Bazlov T. V. Rusinova O. A. Moskalyuk I. M. Bykov |
author2Str |
K. I. Popandopulo S. B. Bazlov T. V. Rusinova O. A. Moskalyuk I. M. Bykov |
ppnlink |
176060979X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:29:48.706Z |
_version_ |
1803594958080311296 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ084162066</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414040943.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ084162066</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. I. Melkonian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Hernioplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. With the introduction of synthetic mesh implants into clinical practice, the recurrence rate of postoperative ventral hernias was signifi cantly reduced. The extensive use of synthetic implants led to the development of specifi c complications. The development of biological implants, based on extensively purifi ed decellularized collagen matrix of xenogeneic origin is highly relevant due to the fact that, unlike synthetic analogues, they have a biological origin and biodegrade in a natural way, gradually being replaced with newly formed connective tissue. The use of bioprostheses reduces the risk of complications.Objectives. To conduct a comparative evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of acellular dermal matrix, obtained by detergent-enzymatic decellularization, and commercially distributed Permacol™ matrix.Methods. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was created by using samples of native skin of pig of Landras breed aged 4 months. The dermis was processed by means of detergent-enzymatic method. In order to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of acellular dermal matrix, the biological samples were divided into 2 groups of 15 samples each. The fi rst group included acellular dermal matrix samples, the second group — native samples of pigs unprocessed dermis. The control group consisted of samples of PermacolTM Surgical Implant, xenotransplant for hernioplasty approved for use in the Russian Federation (Covidien, France). All samples were tested wet using universal testing instrument Instron 1122. MedCalc Statistical Software (Belgium) was used for statistical processing of the study results.Results. In the present study, pig dermis was processed using a detergent-enzymatic method to produce ADM. Routine histological examination confi rmed the removal of all cellular elements, and at the same time it was proven that the native structure of the dermis remained intact during its processing. The mechanical characteristics of xenogenic ADM were further determined. Its tensile strength was 9.1 ± 0.6 MPa (910 N/cm2 ), elongation to break was 21.1 ± 2.3%, and elastic modulus was 50.0 ± 1.6 MPa. These characteristics largely corresponded to the strength characteristics of native pig dermis and far exceeded the necessary physiological parameters. PermacolTM control was tested in two directions (longitudinal and transverse). In the longitudinal direction, the sample had higher mechanical characteristics: strength — 12.0 ± 1.7 MPa, elongation to break — 29.7 ± 2.4%, stiffness modulus — 47.2 ± 6.5 MPa. In the transverse direction, all indicators were 1.5–2 times lower.Conclusion. The developed xenogeneic biological implant in the form of ADM demonstrates rather good characteristics of plasticity, tensile strength and elasticity, to be used as a biological endoprosthesis for plasty of hernia defects of the abdominal wall of any size and shape.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hernioplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">acellular dermal matrix</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ventral hernia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">biological implant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">abdominal wall reconstruction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">surgical fabrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. I. Popandopulo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">S. B. Bazlov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T. V. Rusinova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O. A. Moskalyuk</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I. M. Bykov</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Кубанский научный медицинский вестник</subfield><subfield code="d">Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. “Kuban State Medical University”, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2022), 5, Seite 94-107</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176060979X</subfield><subfield code="x">25419544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:94-107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-5-94-107</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7973dcfc791a4b6b8e34aec20053a141</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2929</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">94-107</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4031916 |