Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Michael Grace [verfasserIn] Jonathan P. Sadler [verfasserIn] Alister J. Scott [verfasserIn] Nick Grayson [verfasserIn] David G. Proverbs [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Emerald Open Research - Emerald Publishing, 2021, 2(2021) |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:2 ; year:2021 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ084474718 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ084474718 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230311030213.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ084474718 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a HD72-88 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Michael Grace |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Biophilic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Co-design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conceptual Framework | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Natural City | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SMART | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Urban Planning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a eng | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Economic growth, development, planning | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Education | |
| 653 | 0 | |a L | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Jonathan P. Sadler |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Alister J. Scott |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Nick Grayson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a David G. Proverbs |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Emerald Open Research |d Emerald Publishing, 2021 |g 2(2021) |w (DE-627)1760612502 |x 26313952 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2021 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 2 |j 2021 | ||
| author_variant |
m g mg j p s jps a j s ajs n g ng d g p dgp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:26313952:2021----::xlrntemrntrliynefcriaiignritgaigrapannadoen |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
HD |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084474718 (DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Michael Grace verfasserin aut Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. Biophilic Co-design Conceptual Framework Natural City SMART Urban Planning eng Economic growth, development, planning Education L Jonathan P. Sadler verfasserin aut Alister J. Scott verfasserin aut Nick Grayson verfasserin aut David G. Proverbs verfasserin aut In Emerald Open Research Emerald Publishing, 2021 2(2021) (DE-627)1760612502 26313952 nnns volume:2 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 kostenfrei https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 2 2021 |
| spelling |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084474718 (DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Michael Grace verfasserin aut Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. Biophilic Co-design Conceptual Framework Natural City SMART Urban Planning eng Economic growth, development, planning Education L Jonathan P. Sadler verfasserin aut Alister J. Scott verfasserin aut Nick Grayson verfasserin aut David G. Proverbs verfasserin aut In Emerald Open Research Emerald Publishing, 2021 2(2021) (DE-627)1760612502 26313952 nnns volume:2 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 kostenfrei https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 2 2021 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084474718 (DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Michael Grace verfasserin aut Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. Biophilic Co-design Conceptual Framework Natural City SMART Urban Planning eng Economic growth, development, planning Education L Jonathan P. Sadler verfasserin aut Alister J. Scott verfasserin aut Nick Grayson verfasserin aut David G. Proverbs verfasserin aut In Emerald Open Research Emerald Publishing, 2021 2(2021) (DE-627)1760612502 26313952 nnns volume:2 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 kostenfrei https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 2 2021 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084474718 (DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Michael Grace verfasserin aut Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. Biophilic Co-design Conceptual Framework Natural City SMART Urban Planning eng Economic growth, development, planning Education L Jonathan P. Sadler verfasserin aut Alister J. Scott verfasserin aut Nick Grayson verfasserin aut David G. Proverbs verfasserin aut In Emerald Open Research Emerald Publishing, 2021 2(2021) (DE-627)1760612502 26313952 nnns volume:2 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 kostenfrei https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 2 2021 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 doi (DE-627)DOAJ084474718 (DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HD72-88 Michael Grace verfasserin aut Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. Biophilic Co-design Conceptual Framework Natural City SMART Urban Planning eng Economic growth, development, planning Education L Jonathan P. Sadler verfasserin aut Alister J. Scott verfasserin aut Nick Grayson verfasserin aut David G. Proverbs verfasserin aut In Emerald Open Research Emerald Publishing, 2021 2(2021) (DE-627)1760612502 26313952 nnns volume:2 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 kostenfrei https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 2 2021 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Emerald Open Research 2(2021) volume:2 year:2021 |
| sourceStr |
In Emerald Open Research 2(2021) volume:2 year:2021 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Biophilic Co-design Conceptual Framework Natural City SMART Urban Planning eng Economic growth, development, planning Education L |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Emerald Open Research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Michael Grace @@aut@@ Jonathan P. Sadler @@aut@@ Alister J. Scott @@aut@@ Nick Grayson @@aut@@ David G. Proverbs @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760612502 |
| id |
DOAJ084474718 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ084474718</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311030213.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ084474718</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD72-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael Grace</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biophilic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Co-design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conceptual Framework</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Natural City</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SMART</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Urban Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic growth, development, planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan P. Sadler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alister J. Scott</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nick Grayson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David G. Proverbs</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Emerald Open Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Emerald Publishing, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2021)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760612502</subfield><subfield code="x">26313952</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
| author |
Michael Grace |
| spellingShingle |
Michael Grace misc HD72-88 misc Biophilic misc Co-design misc Conceptual Framework misc Natural City misc SMART misc Urban Planning misc eng misc Economic growth, development, planning misc Education misc L Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
| authorStr |
Michael Grace |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760612502 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
HD72-88 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
26313952 |
| topic_title |
HD72-88 Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] Biophilic Co-design Conceptual Framework Natural City SMART Urban Planning eng |
| topic |
misc HD72-88 misc Biophilic misc Co-design misc Conceptual Framework misc Natural City misc SMART misc Urban Planning misc eng misc Economic growth, development, planning misc Education misc L |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc HD72-88 misc Biophilic misc Co-design misc Conceptual Framework misc Natural City misc SMART misc Urban Planning misc eng misc Economic growth, development, planning misc Education misc L |
| topic_browse |
misc HD72-88 misc Biophilic misc Co-design misc Conceptual Framework misc Natural City misc SMART misc Urban Planning misc eng misc Economic growth, development, planning misc Education misc L |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Emerald Open Research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760612502 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Emerald Open Research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760612502 |
| title |
Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ084474718 (DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 |
| title_full |
Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
| author_sort |
Michael Grace |
| journal |
Emerald Open Research |
| journalStr |
Emerald Open Research |
| callnumber-first-code |
H |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Michael Grace Jonathan P. Sadler Alister J. Scott Nick Grayson David G. Proverbs |
| container_volume |
2 |
| class |
HD72-88 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Michael Grace |
| doi_str_mv |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
| callnumber |
HD72-88 |
| title_auth |
Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
| abstract |
Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. |
| abstractGer |
Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 |
| title_short |
Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52 https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2 https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Jonathan P. Sadler Alister J. Scott Nick Grayson David G. Proverbs |
| author2Str |
Jonathan P. Sadler Alister J. Scott Nick Grayson David G. Proverbs |
| ppnlink |
1760612502 |
| callnumber-subject |
HD - Industries, Land Use, Labor |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2 |
| callnumber-a |
HD72-88 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T23:12:13.799Z |
| _version_ |
1803601401665814528 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ084474718</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311030213.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ084474718</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJcbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD72-88</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael Grace</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Exploring the smart-natural city interface; re-imagining and re-integrating urban planning and governance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Globally, urban planners and decision makers are pursuing place-based initiatives to develop and enhance urban infrastructure to optimise city performance, competitiveness and sustainability credentials. New discourses associated with big data, Building Information Modelling, SMART cities, green and biophilic thinking inform research, policy and practice agendas to varying extents. However, these discourses remain relatively isolated as much city planning is still pursued within traditional sectoral silos hindering integration. This research explores new conceptual ground at the Smart – Natural City interface within a safe interdisciplinary opportunity space. Using the city of Birmingham UK as a case study, a methodology was developed championing co-design, integration and social learning to develop a conceptual framework to navigate the challenges and opportunities at the Smart-Natural city interface. An innovation workshop and supplementary interviews drew upon the insights and experiences of 25 experts leading to the identification of five key spaces for the conceptualisation and delivery at the Smart-Natural city interface. At the core is the space for connectivity; surrounded by spaces for visioning, place-making, citizen-led participatory learning and monitoring. The framework provides a starting point for improved discussions, understandings and negotiations to cover all components of this particular interface. Our results show the importance of using all spaces within shared narratives; moving towards ‘silver-green’ and living infrastructure and developing data in response to identified priorities. Whilst the need for vision has dominated traditional urban planning discourses we have identified the need for improved connectivity as a prerequisite. The use of all 5 characteristics collectively takes forward the literature on socio-ecological-technological relationships and heralds significant potential to inform and improve city governance frameworks, including the benefits of a transferable deliberative and co-design method that generates ownership with a real stake in the outcomes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biophilic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Co-design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conceptual Framework</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Natural City</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SMART</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Urban Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic growth, development, planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan P. Sadler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alister J. Scott</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nick Grayson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David G. Proverbs</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Emerald Open Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Emerald Publishing, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2021)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760612502</subfield><subfield code="x">26313952</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13226.2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/cbbc9788347f424d8024605165a41f52</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://emeraldopenresearch.com/articles/2-7/v2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2631-3952</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.39999 |