Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers
To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Meng Yang [verfasserIn] Yanmin Jia [verfasserIn] Dongwei Liang [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Symmetry - MDPI AG, 2009, 14(2022), 4, p 652 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2022 ; number:4, p 652 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/sym14040652 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ08533880X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ08533880X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414113847.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/sym14040652 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ08533880X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QA1-939 | |
100 | 0 | |a Meng Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. | ||
650 | 4 | |a grouting sleeve | |
650 | 4 | |a prefabricated pier | |
650 | 4 | |a shaking table test | |
650 | 4 | |a seismic performance | |
653 | 0 | |a Mathematics | |
700 | 0 | |a Yanmin Jia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Dongwei Liang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Symmetry |d MDPI AG, 2009 |g 14(2022), 4, p 652 |w (DE-627)610604112 |w (DE-600)2518382-5 |x 20738994 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2022 |g number:4, p 652 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2022 |e 4, p 652 |
author_variant |
m y my y j yj d l dl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20738994:2022----::hkntbeetadiuainogotnsevcnetnpe |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QA |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3390/sym14040652 doi (DE-627)DOAJ08533880X (DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Meng Yang verfasserin aut Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. grouting sleeve prefabricated pier shaking table test seismic performance Mathematics Yanmin Jia verfasserin aut Dongwei Liang verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 4, p 652 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:4, p 652 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 4, p 652 |
spelling |
10.3390/sym14040652 doi (DE-627)DOAJ08533880X (DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Meng Yang verfasserin aut Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. grouting sleeve prefabricated pier shaking table test seismic performance Mathematics Yanmin Jia verfasserin aut Dongwei Liang verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 4, p 652 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:4, p 652 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 4, p 652 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/sym14040652 doi (DE-627)DOAJ08533880X (DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Meng Yang verfasserin aut Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. grouting sleeve prefabricated pier shaking table test seismic performance Mathematics Yanmin Jia verfasserin aut Dongwei Liang verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 4, p 652 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:4, p 652 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 4, p 652 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/sym14040652 doi (DE-627)DOAJ08533880X (DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Meng Yang verfasserin aut Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. grouting sleeve prefabricated pier shaking table test seismic performance Mathematics Yanmin Jia verfasserin aut Dongwei Liang verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 4, p 652 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:4, p 652 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 4, p 652 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/sym14040652 doi (DE-627)DOAJ08533880X (DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QA1-939 Meng Yang verfasserin aut Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. grouting sleeve prefabricated pier shaking table test seismic performance Mathematics Yanmin Jia verfasserin aut Dongwei Liang verfasserin aut In Symmetry MDPI AG, 2009 14(2022), 4, p 652 (DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 20738994 nnns volume:14 year:2022 number:4, p 652 https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2022 4, p 652 |
language |
English |
source |
In Symmetry 14(2022), 4, p 652 volume:14 year:2022 number:4, p 652 |
sourceStr |
In Symmetry 14(2022), 4, p 652 volume:14 year:2022 number:4, p 652 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
grouting sleeve prefabricated pier shaking table test seismic performance Mathematics |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Symmetry |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Meng Yang @@aut@@ Yanmin Jia @@aut@@ Dongwei Liang @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
610604112 |
id |
DOAJ08533880X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ08533880X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414113847.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/sym14040652</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ08533880X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA1-939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meng Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grouting sleeve</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prefabricated pier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shaking table test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">seismic performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mathematics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanmin Jia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dongwei Liang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Symmetry</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2022), 4, p 652</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604112</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518382-5</subfield><subfield code="x">20738994</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4, p 652</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4, p 652</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Meng Yang |
spellingShingle |
Meng Yang misc QA1-939 misc grouting sleeve misc prefabricated pier misc shaking table test misc seismic performance misc Mathematics Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers |
authorStr |
Meng Yang |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)610604112 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QA1-939 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20738994 |
topic_title |
QA1-939 Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers grouting sleeve prefabricated pier shaking table test seismic performance |
topic |
misc QA1-939 misc grouting sleeve misc prefabricated pier misc shaking table test misc seismic performance misc Mathematics |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QA1-939 misc grouting sleeve misc prefabricated pier misc shaking table test misc seismic performance misc Mathematics |
topic_browse |
misc QA1-939 misc grouting sleeve misc prefabricated pier misc shaking table test misc seismic performance misc Mathematics |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Symmetry |
hierarchy_parent_id |
610604112 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Symmetry |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)610604112 (DE-600)2518382-5 |
title |
Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ08533880X (DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 |
title_full |
Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers |
author_sort |
Meng Yang |
journal |
Symmetry |
journalStr |
Symmetry |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Meng Yang Yanmin Jia Dongwei Liang |
container_volume |
14 |
class |
QA1-939 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Meng Yang |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/sym14040652 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
shaking table tests and simulations of grouting sleeve connecting prefabricated bridge piers |
callnumber |
QA1-939 |
title_auth |
Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers |
abstract |
To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. |
abstractGer |
To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. |
abstract_unstemmed |
To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
4, p 652 |
title_short |
Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652 https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356 https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Yanmin Jia Dongwei Liang |
author2Str |
Yanmin Jia Dongwei Liang |
ppnlink |
610604112 |
callnumber-subject |
QA - Mathematics |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/sym14040652 |
callnumber-a |
QA1-939 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:08:58.443Z |
_version_ |
1803567222957801472 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ08533880X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414113847.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/sym14040652</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ08533880X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA1-939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meng Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Shaking Table Tests and Simulations of Grouting Sleeve Connecting Prefabricated Bridge Piers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To investigate the seismic performance of prefabricated piers with a grouting sleeve connection, two scaled model specimens of symmetrical prefabricated piers with different reinforcement anchorage lengths, and two cast-in-place (CIP) comparison symmetrical specimens, were designed and manufactured. The fabricated specimens were connected by a grouting sleeve, which was in the column of the pier. The height of the pier column of the test piece was 1.425 m, the diameter of the pier column was 0.25 m, and the size of the bearing platform was 0.85 m × 0.85 m × 0.5 m. Shake table tests were performed on the specimens to evaluate crack development, dynamic characteristics, acceleration response and relative displacement of the pier tops, as well as strain in the plastic hinge area. The results revealed the dominant failure mode of the test piers was bending failure, while the cracks were generally horizontal through-cracks. The failure location of the prefabricated specimens with the grouting sleeve was concentrated within one diameter of the pier in the upper sleeve region. Compared with the CIP specimens, the plastic hinge exhibited an obvious upward movement. Under a maximum test loading condition, the peak acceleration at the pier top of the fabricated pier was 11.0% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, the peak relative displacement was 34.2% smaller than that of the CIP specimen, and the peak tensile strain of the pier body was 46.8% smaller. The seismic performance of the prefabricated pier connected via the grouting sleeves was barely affected by changing the anchoring length of the reinforcements in the grouting sleeves. An ABAQUS finite element model was established for the specimens, with good agreement between the model and experimental results. When the seismic load was 0.65 g, the difference between the peak acceleration of the pier top in the X direction and the Y direction of the numerical simulation and the experimental data was less than 15%.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grouting sleeve</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prefabricated pier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shaking table test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">seismic performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mathematics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanmin Jia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dongwei Liang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Symmetry</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2022), 4, p 652</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)610604112</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2518382-5</subfield><subfield code="x">20738994</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4, p 652</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040652</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d2ac20d52eeb48f3adee49507b62e356</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/4/652</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4, p 652</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3998165 |