The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data
The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
N. A. Bobrova [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Russisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Pravoprimenenie - Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017, 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:2 ; year:2018 ; number:1 ; pages:54-62 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ085692301 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ085692301 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230410120012.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230311s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ085692301 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a rus | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a N. A. Bobrova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a freedom of information | |
| 650 | 4 | |a personal data | |
| 650 | 4 | |a public personal data | |
| 650 | 4 | |a confidential personal data | |
| 650 | 4 | |a official secret | |
| 650 | 4 | |a conflict of interest | |
| 650 | 4 | |a teaching load. | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a K | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Pravoprimenenie |d Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017 |g 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 |w (DE-627)1760615978 |x 25421514 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:54-62 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 2 |j 2018 |e 1 |h 54-62 | ||
| author_variant |
n a b nab |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25421514:2018----::hprdxsfplctooteeilt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085692301 (DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus N. A. Bobrova verfasserin aut The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. freedom of information personal data public personal data confidential personal data official secret conflict of interest teaching load. Law K In Pravoprimenenie Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 (DE-627)1760615978 25421514 nnns volume:2 year:2018 number:1 pages:54-62 https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 kostenfrei https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2018 1 54-62 |
| spelling |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085692301 (DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus N. A. Bobrova verfasserin aut The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. freedom of information personal data public personal data confidential personal data official secret conflict of interest teaching load. Law K In Pravoprimenenie Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 (DE-627)1760615978 25421514 nnns volume:2 year:2018 number:1 pages:54-62 https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 kostenfrei https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2018 1 54-62 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085692301 (DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus N. A. Bobrova verfasserin aut The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. freedom of information personal data public personal data confidential personal data official secret conflict of interest teaching load. Law K In Pravoprimenenie Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 (DE-627)1760615978 25421514 nnns volume:2 year:2018 number:1 pages:54-62 https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 kostenfrei https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2018 1 54-62 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085692301 (DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus N. A. Bobrova verfasserin aut The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. freedom of information personal data public personal data confidential personal data official secret conflict of interest teaching load. Law K In Pravoprimenenie Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 (DE-627)1760615978 25421514 nnns volume:2 year:2018 number:1 pages:54-62 https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 kostenfrei https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2018 1 54-62 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085692301 (DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb rus N. A. Bobrova verfasserin aut The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. freedom of information personal data public personal data confidential personal data official secret conflict of interest teaching load. Law K In Pravoprimenenie Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 (DE-627)1760615978 25421514 nnns volume:2 year:2018 number:1 pages:54-62 https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 kostenfrei https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2 2018 1 54-62 |
| language |
Russian |
| source |
In Pravoprimenenie 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 volume:2 year:2018 number:1 pages:54-62 |
| sourceStr |
In Pravoprimenenie 2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62 volume:2 year:2018 number:1 pages:54-62 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
freedom of information personal data public personal data confidential personal data official secret conflict of interest teaching load. Law K |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Pravoprimenenie |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
N. A. Bobrova @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760615978 |
| id |
DOAJ085692301 |
| language_de |
russisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ085692301</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410120012.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ085692301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N. A. Bobrova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">freedom of information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">public personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">confidential personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">official secret</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">conflict of interest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">teaching load.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pravoprimenenie</subfield><subfield code="d">Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760615978</subfield><subfield code="x">25421514</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:54-62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">54-62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
N. A. Bobrova |
| spellingShingle |
N. A. Bobrova misc freedom of information misc personal data misc public personal data misc confidential personal data misc official secret misc conflict of interest misc teaching load. misc Law misc K The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data |
| authorStr |
N. A. Bobrova |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760615978 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
25421514 |
| topic_title |
The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data freedom of information personal data public personal data confidential personal data official secret conflict of interest teaching load |
| topic |
misc freedom of information misc personal data misc public personal data misc confidential personal data misc official secret misc conflict of interest misc teaching load. misc Law misc K |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc freedom of information misc personal data misc public personal data misc confidential personal data misc official secret misc conflict of interest misc teaching load. misc Law misc K |
| topic_browse |
misc freedom of information misc personal data misc public personal data misc confidential personal data misc official secret misc conflict of interest misc teaching load. misc Law misc K |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Pravoprimenenie |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760615978 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Pravoprimenenie |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760615978 |
| title |
The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ085692301 (DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 |
| title_full |
The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data |
| author_sort |
N. A. Bobrova |
| journal |
Pravoprimenenie |
| journalStr |
Pravoprimenenie |
| lang_code |
rus |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
54 |
| author_browse |
N. A. Bobrova |
| container_volume |
2 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
N. A. Bobrova |
| doi_str_mv |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 |
| title_sort |
paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data |
| title_auth |
The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data |
| abstract |
The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. |
| abstractGer |
The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492 https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142 https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760615978 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:17:36.610Z |
| _version_ |
1803575316043530240 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ085692301</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410120012.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ085692301</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N. A. Bobrova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The paradoxes of application of the legislation on personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of legislation on personal data and it’s enforcement in the educational process in higher educational institutions.The purpose of the article is highlight controversies in legislation on personal data, generating mistakes in enforcement during the educational procedures.The description of methodology. The author uses methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of interpreting the concepts of “personal data”, “confidential personal data”, “official secret”, “publicly available personal data” is extremely contradictory.Currently, there are hundreds departmental regulatory legal acts about various aspects of the protection of official secrets. Analysis of these acts shows that the rules aimed at preserving the confidentiality of official information regulate the following aspects of the functioning of state and municipal bodies, institutions and organizations: (a) ensuring access to official information; (b) providing state and municipal services; (c) document flow and record keeping; (d) staffing; (e) anti-corruption; (f) use of information systems; (g) interaction with the media; (h) prevention of conflicts of interest.The study load cannot be attributed to the personal data, that requires the consent of the teacher to be processed. The study load is nothing more than publicly available information, arising from the principles of collegiality of educational process management, competitiveness of education, its openness and transparency, that are established in the legislation on education.Conclusions. Extended interpretation of confidential personal data and inclusion of the teaching load to it is unacceptable. This contributes to conflicts of interest, corrupt factors and devaluation of higher education.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">freedom of information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">public personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">confidential personal data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">official secret</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">conflict of interest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">teaching load.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pravoprimenenie</subfield><subfield code="d">Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">2(2018), 1, Seite 54-62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760615978</subfield><subfield code="x">25421514</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:2</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:54-62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(1).54-62</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2a3c126d699a4cbe82154dd12fdd0492</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/142</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2542-1514</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">54-62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4005537 |