Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective
The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted u...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ismail Ismail [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Arabisch ; Englisch ; Indonesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Jurnal Madania - IAIN Bengkulu, 2017, 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2021 ; number:1 ; pages:113-124 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ085844241 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ085844241 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230311041924.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ085844241 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ara |a eng |a ind | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BP1-253 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Ismail Ismail |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a meeting point | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sufism reasoning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fiqh reasoning. | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Islam | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Jurnal Madania |d IAIN Bengkulu, 2017 |g 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 |w (DE-627)1760592110 |x 25021826 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g pages:113-124 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2021 |e 1 |h 113-124 | ||
| author_variant |
i i ii |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25021826:2021----::nesadnsfsadsaijrsrdneesnniteemfeiiumdrtopr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
BP |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085844241 (DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng ind BP1-253 Ismail Ismail verfasserin aut Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. meeting point sufism reasoning fiqh reasoning. Islam In Jurnal Madania IAIN Bengkulu, 2017 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 (DE-627)1760592110 25021826 nnns volume:25 year:2021 number:1 pages:113-124 https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd kostenfrei https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2021 1 113-124 |
| spelling |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085844241 (DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng ind BP1-253 Ismail Ismail verfasserin aut Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. meeting point sufism reasoning fiqh reasoning. Islam In Jurnal Madania IAIN Bengkulu, 2017 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 (DE-627)1760592110 25021826 nnns volume:25 year:2021 number:1 pages:113-124 https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd kostenfrei https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2021 1 113-124 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085844241 (DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng ind BP1-253 Ismail Ismail verfasserin aut Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. meeting point sufism reasoning fiqh reasoning. Islam In Jurnal Madania IAIN Bengkulu, 2017 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 (DE-627)1760592110 25021826 nnns volume:25 year:2021 number:1 pages:113-124 https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd kostenfrei https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2021 1 113-124 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085844241 (DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng ind BP1-253 Ismail Ismail verfasserin aut Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. meeting point sufism reasoning fiqh reasoning. Islam In Jurnal Madania IAIN Bengkulu, 2017 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 (DE-627)1760592110 25021826 nnns volume:25 year:2021 number:1 pages:113-124 https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd kostenfrei https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2021 1 113-124 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 doi (DE-627)DOAJ085844241 (DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng ind BP1-253 Ismail Ismail verfasserin aut Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. meeting point sufism reasoning fiqh reasoning. Islam In Jurnal Madania IAIN Bengkulu, 2017 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 (DE-627)1760592110 25021826 nnns volume:25 year:2021 number:1 pages:113-124 https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd kostenfrei https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2021 1 113-124 |
| language |
Arabic English Indonesian |
| source |
In Jurnal Madania 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 volume:25 year:2021 number:1 pages:113-124 |
| sourceStr |
In Jurnal Madania 25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124 volume:25 year:2021 number:1 pages:113-124 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
meeting point sufism reasoning fiqh reasoning. Islam |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Jurnal Madania |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ismail Ismail @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760592110 |
| id |
DOAJ085844241 |
| language_de |
arabisch englisch Sangiang |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ085844241</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311041924.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ085844241</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ara</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BP1-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ismail Ismail</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">meeting point</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sufism reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fiqh reasoning.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Madania</subfield><subfield code="d">IAIN Bengkulu, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760592110</subfield><subfield code="x">25021826</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:113-124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">113-124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| author |
Ismail Ismail |
| spellingShingle |
Ismail Ismail misc BP1-253 misc meeting point misc sufism reasoning misc fiqh reasoning. misc Islam Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective |
| authorStr |
Ismail Ismail |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760592110 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
BP1-253 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
25021826 |
| topic_title |
BP1-253 Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective meeting point sufism reasoning fiqh reasoning |
| topic |
misc BP1-253 misc meeting point misc sufism reasoning misc fiqh reasoning. misc Islam |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc BP1-253 misc meeting point misc sufism reasoning misc fiqh reasoning. misc Islam |
| topic_browse |
misc BP1-253 misc meeting point misc sufism reasoning misc fiqh reasoning. misc Islam |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Jurnal Madania |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760592110 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Jurnal Madania |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760592110 |
| title |
Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ085844241 (DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd |
| title_full |
Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective |
| author_sort |
Ismail Ismail |
| journal |
Jurnal Madania |
| journalStr |
Jurnal Madania |
| callnumber-first-code |
B |
| lang_code |
ara eng ind |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
113 |
| author_browse |
Ismail Ismail |
| container_volume |
25 |
| class |
BP1-253 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ismail Ismail |
| doi_str_mv |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 |
| title_sort |
understanding sufism and islamic jurisprudence reasoning in the term of religious moderation: perennial philosophical perspective |
| callnumber |
BP1-253 |
| title_auth |
Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective |
| abstract |
The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. |
| abstractGer |
The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567 https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143 https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760592110 |
| callnumber-subject |
BP - Islam, Bahaism, Theosophy |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567 |
| callnumber-a |
BP1-253 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:11:45.154Z |
| _version_ |
1803578722392997888 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ085844241</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311041924.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ085844241</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ara</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BP1-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ismail Ismail</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Understanding Sufism and Islamic Jurisprudence Reasoning in the Term of Religious Moderation: Perennial Philosophical Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The truth claim phenomenon in understanding religious teachings often occurs in human life. It needs to be avoided by finding solutions. This article aimed to comprehend religious teachings using the reasoning of Sufism and Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) in a balanced way in order to avoid distorted understanding due to the interpretation of different religious teachings. Sufism and Fiqh reasoning are described in order to explain the meeting point between them. Sufism historically has developed since the beginning of Islam (I and II centuries H/8 AD), as well as Fiqh has developed through four periods, namely the Prophet, the Companions (al-Khulafâ' al-Râsyidîn), the Ijtihad, and the Taklid period. Life requires a moderate attitude in religion. The practice of Sufism empirically is considered as a cure for mental suffering in the midst of a materialistic-hedonistic humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the practice of Fiqh focuses on the issue of haliyah-`amliyah-furu`iyah ijtihad. At the empirical level, Sufism and Fiqh are interrelated and integrated. Therefore, there is always a meeting point that unites Sufism and Fiqh reasoning. Quoting the opinion of Imam Shafi`i "wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa", whoever practices the two together (Sufism and Fiqh), he has correctly carried out religious teachings. Fenomena klaim kebenaran (truth claim) dalam memahami ajaran agama kerap kali terjadi dalam kehidupan manusia. Hal ini perlu dihindari dan perlu dicari solusinya. Artikel ini bertujuan memahami ajaran agama menggunakan nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dengan imbang guna menghindari pemahaman menyimpang akibat penafsiran ajaran agama yang berbeda. Nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih dideskripsikan guna menjelaskan titik temu antara antar keduanya. Secara historis, tasawuf telah berkembang sejak awal kelahiran Islam (abad I dan II H/8 M), begitu pula fikih berkembang melalui empat periode yaitu periode Nabi, periode Sahabat, periode ijtihad dan perode taklid. Kehidupan saat ini, dibutuhkan sikap moderat dalam beragama. Secara empirik, praktek tasawuf dianggap sebagai obat penyembuh penderitaan batin di tengah-tengah krisis kemanusiaan yang serba materialistik-hedonistik. Di sisi yang lain, praktek fikih menitikberatkan pada persoalan ijtihad yang bersifat haliyah-`amliyah-furû`iyah. Dalam tataran empiris antara tasawuf dan fikih keduanya saling berkait dan terintegrasi. Karenanya, antara nalar tasawuf dan nalar fikih selalu ada titik temu yang menyatukan antara keduanya. Mengutip pendapat Imam Shafi`i “wa man jama`a bainahuma tahaqqaqa”, siapa yang mengamalkan antara keduanya secara bersama-sama (tasawuf dan fikih) maka ia telah menjalankan ajaran agama dengan benar.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">meeting point</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sufism reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fiqh reasoning.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Madania</subfield><subfield code="d">IAIN Bengkulu, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2021), 1, Seite 113-124</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760592110</subfield><subfield code="x">25021826</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:113-124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v25i1.4567</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2733242964fc4973852c44f7d407f6fd</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/madania/article/view/4567</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1410-8143</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2502-1826</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">113-124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4009495 |