Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey

This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, ad...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Sarang Shaikh [verfasserIn] Sindhu Abro [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems - UMP Publisher, 2016, 5(2020), 2
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:5 ; year:2020 ; number:2

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ085867128

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ085867128
003	DE-627
005	20230311042103.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230311s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ085867128
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TK7885-7895
050		0	\|a QA76.75-76.765
100	0		\|a Sarang Shaikh \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product.
650		4	\|a Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
650		4	\|a Traditional Methodology
650		4	\|a Agile Methodology
650		4	\|a Software Development
650		4	\|a Software Engineering
653		0	\|a Computer engineering. Computer hardware
653		0	\|a Computer software
700	0		\|a Sindhu Abro \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems \|d UMP Publisher, 2016 \|g 5(2020), 2 \|w (DE-627)1755015402 \|x 21800650 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:5 \|g year:2020 \|g number:2
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 5 \|j 2020 \|e 2

Indexfelder

author_variant	s s ss s a sa
matchkey_str	article:21800650:2020----::oprsnfrdtoaaieotaeeeomnmt
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	TK
publishDate	2020
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ085867128 (DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK7885-7895 QA76.75-76.765 Sarang Shaikh verfasserin aut Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering Computer engineering. Computer hardware Computer software Sindhu Abro verfasserin aut In International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems UMP Publisher, 2016 5(2020), 2 (DE-627)1755015402 21800650 nnns volume:5 year:2020 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe kostenfrei https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2020 2
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ085867128 (DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK7885-7895 QA76.75-76.765 Sarang Shaikh verfasserin aut Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering Computer engineering. Computer hardware Computer software Sindhu Abro verfasserin aut In International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems UMP Publisher, 2016 5(2020), 2 (DE-627)1755015402 21800650 nnns volume:5 year:2020 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe kostenfrei https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2020 2
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ085867128 (DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK7885-7895 QA76.75-76.765 Sarang Shaikh verfasserin aut Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering Computer engineering. Computer hardware Computer software Sindhu Abro verfasserin aut In International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems UMP Publisher, 2016 5(2020), 2 (DE-627)1755015402 21800650 nnns volume:5 year:2020 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe kostenfrei https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2020 2
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ085867128 (DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK7885-7895 QA76.75-76.765 Sarang Shaikh verfasserin aut Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering Computer engineering. Computer hardware Computer software Sindhu Abro verfasserin aut In International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems UMP Publisher, 2016 5(2020), 2 (DE-627)1755015402 21800650 nnns volume:5 year:2020 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe kostenfrei https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2020 2
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ085867128 (DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK7885-7895 QA76.75-76.765 Sarang Shaikh verfasserin aut Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering Computer engineering. Computer hardware Computer software Sindhu Abro verfasserin aut In International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems UMP Publisher, 2016 5(2020), 2 (DE-627)1755015402 21800650 nnns volume:5 year:2020 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe kostenfrei https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2020 2
language	English
source	In International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems 5(2020), 2 volume:5 year:2020 number:2
sourceStr	In International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems 5(2020), 2 volume:5 year:2020 number:2
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering Computer engineering. Computer hardware Computer software
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Sarang Shaikh @@aut@@ Sindhu Abro @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1755015402
id	DOAJ085867128
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ085867128</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311042103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ085867128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK7885-7895</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA76.75-76.765</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sarang Shaikh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traditional Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agile Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software Engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computer engineering. Computer hardware</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computer software</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sindhu Abro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">UMP Publisher, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2020), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1755015402</subfield><subfield code="x">21800650</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Sarang Shaikh
spellingShingle	Sarang Shaikh misc TK7885-7895 misc QA76.75-76.765 misc Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) misc Traditional Methodology misc Agile Methodology misc Software Development misc Software Engineering misc Computer engineering. Computer hardware misc Computer software Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey
authorStr	Sarang Shaikh
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1755015402
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TK7885-7895
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	21800650
topic_title	TK7885-7895 QA76.75-76.765 Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Traditional Methodology Agile Methodology Software Development Software Engineering
topic	misc TK7885-7895 misc QA76.75-76.765 misc Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) misc Traditional Methodology misc Agile Methodology misc Software Development misc Software Engineering misc Computer engineering. Computer hardware misc Computer software
topic_unstemmed	misc TK7885-7895 misc QA76.75-76.765 misc Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) misc Traditional Methodology misc Agile Methodology misc Software Development misc Software Engineering misc Computer engineering. Computer hardware misc Computer software
topic_browse	misc TK7885-7895 misc QA76.75-76.765 misc Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) misc Traditional Methodology misc Agile Methodology misc Software Development misc Software Engineering misc Computer engineering. Computer hardware misc Computer software
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems
hierarchy_parent_id	1755015402
hierarchy_top_title	International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1755015402
title	Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ085867128 (DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe
title_full	Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey
author_sort	Sarang Shaikh
journal	International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems
journalStr	International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Sarang Shaikh Sindhu Abro
container_volume	5
class	TK7885-7895 QA76.75-76.765
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Sarang Shaikh
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparison of traditional & agile software development methodology: a short survey
callnumber	TK7885-7895
title_auth	Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey
abstract	This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product.
abstractGer	This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product.
abstract_unstemmed	This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey
url	https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583 https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522 https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650
remote_bool	true
author2	Sindhu Abro
author2Str	Sindhu Abro
ppnlink	1755015402
callnumber-subject	TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	TK7885-7895
up_date	2024-07-03T17:19:35.962Z
_version_	1803579216063627264
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ085867128</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311042103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ085867128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK7885-7895</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QA76.75-76.765</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sarang Shaikh</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper explains comparison between traditional and agile software development methodologies. Due to the significant use of software development processes, in product development this discussion is quite important. For discussion, their definitions, development life cycles, critical practices, advantages, disadvantages used as evaluative parameters including six different modes, three from each. This research also summarizes limitations and factors used to control the cost of both methodologies. The discussion continued with the conclusion that what are the core steps while selecting desired software development methodology either traditional or agile and what will be the impact of the end product.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traditional Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agile Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software Engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computer engineering. Computer hardware</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Computer software</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sindhu Abro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">UMP Publisher, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2020), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1755015402</subfield><subfield code="x">21800650</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1f9c8a1ec334460e81998468be40d5fe</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.ump.edu.my/ijsecs/article/view/2583</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2289-8522</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2180-0650</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.397417

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparison of Traditional & Agile Software Development Methodology: A Short Survey

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?