Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya
Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflec...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Indonesisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota - Diponegoro University, 2019, 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2021 ; number:2 ; pages:214-229 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ086213369 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ086213369 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230311044746.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ind c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ086213369 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a ind | ||
050 | 0 | |a HT390-395 | |
050 | 0 | |a HT165.5-169.9 | |
100 | 0 | |a Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. | ||
650 | 4 | |a participation channel | |
650 | 4 | |a participation ladder | |
650 | 4 | |a smart citizen | |
650 | 4 | |a smart city | |
650 | 4 | |a digital participation | |
653 | 0 | |a Regional planning | |
653 | 0 | |a City planning | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota |d Diponegoro University, 2019 |g 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 |w (DE-627)1760628964 |x 25979272 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g pages:214-229 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 17 |j 2021 |e 2 |h 214-229 |
author_variant |
d z e h dzeh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:25979272:2021----::oaedsnusaatdkssaapriiaiagmd |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
callnumber-subject-code |
HT |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086213369 (DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ind HT390-395 HT165.5-169.9 Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin verfasserin aut Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. participation channel participation ladder smart citizen smart city digital participation Regional planning City planning In Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota Diponegoro University, 2019 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 (DE-627)1760628964 25979272 nnns volume:17 year:2021 number:2 pages:214-229 https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d kostenfrei https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 17 2021 2 214-229 |
spelling |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086213369 (DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ind HT390-395 HT165.5-169.9 Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin verfasserin aut Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. participation channel participation ladder smart citizen smart city digital participation Regional planning City planning In Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota Diponegoro University, 2019 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 (DE-627)1760628964 25979272 nnns volume:17 year:2021 number:2 pages:214-229 https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d kostenfrei https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 17 2021 2 214-229 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086213369 (DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ind HT390-395 HT165.5-169.9 Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin verfasserin aut Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. participation channel participation ladder smart citizen smart city digital participation Regional planning City planning In Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota Diponegoro University, 2019 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 (DE-627)1760628964 25979272 nnns volume:17 year:2021 number:2 pages:214-229 https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d kostenfrei https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 17 2021 2 214-229 |
allfieldsGer |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086213369 (DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ind HT390-395 HT165.5-169.9 Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin verfasserin aut Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. participation channel participation ladder smart citizen smart city digital participation Regional planning City planning In Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota Diponegoro University, 2019 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 (DE-627)1760628964 25979272 nnns volume:17 year:2021 number:2 pages:214-229 https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d kostenfrei https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 17 2021 2 214-229 |
allfieldsSound |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086213369 (DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ind HT390-395 HT165.5-169.9 Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin verfasserin aut Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. participation channel participation ladder smart citizen smart city digital participation Regional planning City planning In Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota Diponegoro University, 2019 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 (DE-627)1760628964 25979272 nnns volume:17 year:2021 number:2 pages:214-229 https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d kostenfrei https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 17 2021 2 214-229 |
language |
Indonesian |
source |
In Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 volume:17 year:2021 number:2 pages:214-229 |
sourceStr |
In Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota 17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229 volume:17 year:2021 number:2 pages:214-229 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
participation channel participation ladder smart citizen smart city digital participation Regional planning City planning |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760628964 |
id |
DOAJ086213369 |
language_de |
Sangiang |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ086213369</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311044746.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ind c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ086213369</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HT390-395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HT165.5-169.9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">participation channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">participation ladder</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">smart citizen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">smart city</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">digital participation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Regional planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">City planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota</subfield><subfield code="d">Diponegoro University, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760628964</subfield><subfield code="x">25979272</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:214-229</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">214-229</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
author |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin |
spellingShingle |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin misc HT390-395 misc HT165.5-169.9 misc participation channel misc participation ladder misc smart citizen misc smart city misc digital participation misc Regional planning misc City planning Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya |
authorStr |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760628964 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
HT390-395 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
25979272 |
topic_title |
HT390-395 HT165.5-169.9 Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya participation channel participation ladder smart citizen smart city digital participation |
topic |
misc HT390-395 misc HT165.5-169.9 misc participation channel misc participation ladder misc smart citizen misc smart city misc digital participation misc Regional planning misc City planning |
topic_unstemmed |
misc HT390-395 misc HT165.5-169.9 misc participation channel misc participation ladder misc smart citizen misc smart city misc digital participation misc Regional planning misc City planning |
topic_browse |
misc HT390-395 misc HT165.5-169.9 misc participation channel misc participation ladder misc smart citizen misc smart city misc digital participation misc Regional planning misc City planning |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760628964 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760628964 |
title |
Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ086213369 (DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d |
title_full |
Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya |
author_sort |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin |
journal |
Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota |
journalStr |
Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota |
callnumber-first-code |
H |
lang_code |
ind |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
214 |
author_browse |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin |
container_volume |
17 |
class |
HT390-395 HT165.5-169.9 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin |
doi_str_mv |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 |
title_sort |
kota cerdas untuk siapa? studi kasus kanal partisipasi warga medan, jakarta, dan surabaya |
callnumber |
HT390-395 |
title_auth |
Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya |
abstract |
Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. |
abstractGer |
Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya |
url |
https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541 https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903 https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1760628964 |
callnumber-subject |
HT - Communities, Classes, Races |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541 |
callnumber-a |
HT390-395 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:20:37.867Z |
_version_ |
1803586830721875968 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ086213369</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230311044746.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ind c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ086213369</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HT390-395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HT165.5-169.9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dian Zuchraeni Ekasari Hasanuddin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kota Cerdas Untuk Siapa? Studi Kasus Kanal Partisipasi Warga Medan, Jakarta, dan Surabaya</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smart City is inevitable in a world of rapid technological developments and accompanied by various urban challenges. The implementation of smart city could become very technical and mechanistic, in a way that deprived from its essential role as a means of citizens’ livelihood. This concern is reflected in the main critics (Hollands, 2008; Krivy, 2016; Cardullo & Kitchin, 2018;) of the technocratic, unequal, and less citizen-centric characters of smart city. Since most of the criticism resulted from research on smart cities in other countries, it is interesting to examine smart citizen aspect in Indonesia especially as smart city has been implemented in more than a hundred cities within a decade. Therefore, this paper explores the existence of citizen digital participation channels in Medan, Jakarta and Surabaya, as well as its position in the classic Ladder of Citizen Participation from Arnstein (1969) and the recent Ladder of Participation in Civic Technology from Offenhuber (2015). The analysis finds the highest ladder of participation is Partnership in the form of Hackathon in Jakarta. Placation is the second highest ladder found in Medan, Surabaya, and Jakarta through Development Planning Deliberations forum or Musrenbang. These findings along with its relation to smart governance and smart people aspects provide a portrait of citizens' significance in the multidimensional development of Indonesian Smart City.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">participation channel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">participation ladder</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">smart citizen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">smart city</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">digital participation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Regional planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">City planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota</subfield><subfield code="d">Diponegoro University, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2021), 2, Seite 214-229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760628964</subfield><subfield code="x">25979272</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:214-229</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v17i2.36541</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7b56f7c121e34e3fade6d94abee56e1d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/view/36541</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1858-3903</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2597-9272</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">214-229</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4005003 |