Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)

Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan [verfasserIn] Ilya O. Isaev [verfasserIn] Anastasia S. Almakaeva [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Russisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Vestnik MGSU - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013, 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:15 ; year:2020 ; number:12 ; pages:1644-1653

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ086505319

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ086505319
003	DE-627
005	20230503110449.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230311s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ086505319
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a rus
050		0	\|a NA1-9428
050		0	\|a HD9715-9717.5
100	0		\|a Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements.
650		4	\|a trenchless construction
650		4	\|a shield driving
650		4	\|a excess excavation ratio
650		4	\|a geodetic monitoring
650		4	\|a actual settlement
650		4	\|a projected settlement
650		4	\|a tunnel boring machine
650		4	\|a influence assessment
653		0	\|a Architecture
653		0	\|a Construction industry
700	0		\|a Ilya O. Isaev \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Anastasia S. Almakaeva \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Vestnik MGSU \|d Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 \|g 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 \|w (DE-627)792409914 \|w (DE-600)2781261-3 \|x 23046600 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:15 \|g year:2020 \|g number:12 \|g pages:1644-1653
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 15 \|j 2020 \|e 12 \|h 1644-1653

Indexfelder

author_variant	a z t m aztm i o i ioi a s a asa
matchkey_str	article:23046600:2020----::dniiainfhataecsecvtortotkaosaatet
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	NA
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086505319 (DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan verfasserin aut Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements. trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment Architecture Construction industry Ilya O. Isaev verfasserin aut Anastasia S. Almakaeva verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1644-1653 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1644-1653
spelling	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086505319 (DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan verfasserin aut Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements. trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment Architecture Construction industry Ilya O. Isaev verfasserin aut Anastasia S. Almakaeva verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1644-1653 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1644-1653
allfields_unstemmed	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086505319 (DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan verfasserin aut Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements. trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment Architecture Construction industry Ilya O. Isaev verfasserin aut Anastasia S. Almakaeva verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1644-1653 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1644-1653
allfieldsGer	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086505319 (DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan verfasserin aut Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements. trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment Architecture Construction industry Ilya O. Isaev verfasserin aut Anastasia S. Almakaeva verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1644-1653 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1644-1653
allfieldsSound	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 doi (DE-627)DOAJ086505319 (DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan verfasserin aut Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements. trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment Architecture Construction industry Ilya O. Isaev verfasserin aut Anastasia S. Almakaeva verfasserin aut In Vestnik MGSU Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 (DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3 23046600 nnns volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1644-1653 https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2020 12 1644-1653
language	English Russian
source	In Vestnik MGSU 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1644-1653
sourceStr	In Vestnik MGSU 15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653 volume:15 year:2020 number:12 pages:1644-1653
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment Architecture Construction industry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Vestnik MGSU
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan @@aut@@ Ilya O. Isaev @@aut@@ Anastasia S. Almakaeva @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	792409914
id	DOAJ086505319
language_de	englisch russisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ086505319</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503110449.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ086505319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NA1-9428</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD9715-9717.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">trenchless construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shield driving</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">excess excavation ratio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">geodetic monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">actual settlement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">projected settlement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tunnel boring machine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">influence assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Architecture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Construction industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ilya O. Isaev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anastasia S. Almakaeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Vestnik MGSU</subfield><subfield code="d">Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)792409914</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2781261-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23046600</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1644-1653</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1644-1653</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	N - Fine Arts
author	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan
spellingShingle	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc trenchless construction misc shield driving misc excess excavation ratio misc geodetic monitoring misc actual settlement misc projected settlement misc tunnel boring machine misc influence assessment misc Architecture misc Construction industry Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)
authorStr	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)792409914
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	NA1-9428
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	23046600
topic_title	NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5 Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site) trenchless construction shield driving excess excavation ratio geodetic monitoring actual settlement projected settlement tunnel boring machine influence assessment
topic	misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc trenchless construction misc shield driving misc excess excavation ratio misc geodetic monitoring misc actual settlement misc projected settlement misc tunnel boring machine misc influence assessment misc Architecture misc Construction industry
topic_unstemmed	misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc trenchless construction misc shield driving misc excess excavation ratio misc geodetic monitoring misc actual settlement misc projected settlement misc tunnel boring machine misc influence assessment misc Architecture misc Construction industry
topic_browse	misc NA1-9428 misc HD9715-9717.5 misc trenchless construction misc shield driving misc excess excavation ratio misc geodetic monitoring misc actual settlement misc projected settlement misc tunnel boring machine misc influence assessment misc Architecture misc Construction industry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Vestnik MGSU
hierarchy_parent_id	792409914
hierarchy_top_title	Vestnik MGSU
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)792409914 (DE-600)2781261-3
title	Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ086505319 (DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942
title_full	Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)
author_sort	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan
journal	Vestnik MGSU
journalStr	Vestnik MGSU
callnumber-first-code	N
lang_code	eng rus
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	1644
author_browse	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan Ilya O. Isaev Anastasia S. Almakaeva
container_volume	15
class	NA1-9428 HD9715-9717.5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan
doi_str_mv	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (stakhanovskaya street – nizhegorodskaya street site)
callnumber	NA1-9428
title_auth	Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)
abstract	Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements.
abstractGer	Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements.
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	12
title_short	Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)
url	https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653 https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942 https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935
remote_bool	true
author2	Ilya O. Isaev Anastasia S. Almakaeva
author2Str	Ilya O. Isaev Anastasia S. Almakaeva
ppnlink	792409914
callnumber-subject	NA - Architecture
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653
callnumber-a	NA1-9428
up_date	2024-07-03T21:05:36.676Z
_version_	1803593435503919104
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ086505319</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503110449.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ086505319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NA1-9428</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD9715-9717.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Armen Z. Ter-Martirosyan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction. Redundant strain arises in buildings and structures in areas of construction work influence caused by the deep bore tunneling performed by tunnel boring machines. The strain analysis must include an excess excavation ratio that depends on the structural features of the shield, the technology of grouting mixture injection outside the lining, the counterweight pressure applied to the shield face and geotechnical conditions so that excessive settlement could be taken account of. The purpose of the article is to identify actual values of the excess excavation ratio to raise excavation and determine the values of standard averaged excess excavation to be further applied in design. Materials and methods. This paper focuses on tunnel driving between “Stakhanovskaya Street” and “Nizhegorodskaya Street” stations. The project excess excavation ratio was applied pursuant to the regulatory documents in order to perform the analysis using PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D software packages. The method of sequential iteration was applied to identify the value of excess excavation in line with the actual settlement of buildings and structures obtained by means of monitoring. Results. The analysis has shown that the actual excess excavation ratio varies between 0.1 and 1.2 % for this construction site which is below the values required by the regulatory documents. As for the 3D setting, the values of actual excess excavation ratios are 2 to 4 times higher than those obtained for the 2D setting, although the value of the actual building settlement remains the same. Conclusions. Since the actual building settlement is smaller than the projected one, the cost of deep bored tunneling can be reduced by cutting the cost of protection of nearby buildings and structures within the area of tunneling influence without violating any safety requirements and also by reducing the number of buildings withing the projected area of influence, and respectively, by reducing the cost of geodetic monitoring over their displacements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">trenchless construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">shield driving</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">excess excavation ratio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">geodetic monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">actual settlement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">projected settlement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tunnel boring machine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">influence assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Architecture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Construction industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ilya O. Isaev</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anastasia S. Almakaeva</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Vestnik MGSU</subfield><subfield code="d">Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU), 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2020), 12, Seite 1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)792409914</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2781261-3</subfield><subfield code="x">23046600</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1644-1653</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a4d4476a188f494ab83bc16c0b5d9942</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.12.1644-1653</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1997-0935</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1644-1653</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4002724

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Identification of the actual excess excavation ratio (Stakhanovskaya street – Nizhegorodskaya street site)

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?