Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form

Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Seungho Ryu [verfasserIn] Madeline P. Casanova [verfasserIn] Jonathan D. Moore [verfasserIn] Adam C. Cady [verfasserIn] Russell T. Baker [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research - Wiley, 2008, 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:15 ; year:2022 ; number:1 ; pages:n/a-n/a

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ086907476

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ086907476
003	DE-627
005	20240413075201.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230311s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ086907476
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC925-935
100	0		\|a Seungho Ryu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels.
650		4	\|a Psychometric evaluation
650		4	\|a Patient‐Reported Outcomes
650		4	\|a Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis
653		0	\|a Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
700	0		\|a Madeline P. Casanova \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jonathan D. Moore \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Adam C. Cady \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Russell T. Baker \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Foot and Ankle Research \|d Wiley, 2008 \|g 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a \|w (DE-627)573742634 \|w (DE-600)2440706-9 \|x 17571146 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:15 \|g year:2022 \|g number:1 \|g pages:n/a-n/a
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 15 \|j 2022 \|e 1 \|h n/a-n/a

Indexfelder

author_variant	s r sr m p c mpc j d m jdm a c c acc r t b rtb
matchkey_str	article:17571146:2022----::ayaeershairtooteotucinne
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y doi (DE-627)DOAJ086907476 (DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC925-935 Seungho Ryu verfasserin aut Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels. Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis Diseases of the musculoskeletal system Madeline P. Casanova verfasserin aut Jonathan D. Moore verfasserin aut Adam C. Cady verfasserin aut Russell T. Baker verfasserin aut In Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Wiley, 2008 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a (DE-627)573742634 (DE-600)2440706-9 17571146 nnns volume:15 year:2022 number:1 pages:n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2022 1 n/a-n/a
spelling	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y doi (DE-627)DOAJ086907476 (DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC925-935 Seungho Ryu verfasserin aut Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels. Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis Diseases of the musculoskeletal system Madeline P. Casanova verfasserin aut Jonathan D. Moore verfasserin aut Adam C. Cady verfasserin aut Russell T. Baker verfasserin aut In Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Wiley, 2008 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a (DE-627)573742634 (DE-600)2440706-9 17571146 nnns volume:15 year:2022 number:1 pages:n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2022 1 n/a-n/a
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y doi (DE-627)DOAJ086907476 (DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC925-935 Seungho Ryu verfasserin aut Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels. Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis Diseases of the musculoskeletal system Madeline P. Casanova verfasserin aut Jonathan D. Moore verfasserin aut Adam C. Cady verfasserin aut Russell T. Baker verfasserin aut In Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Wiley, 2008 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a (DE-627)573742634 (DE-600)2440706-9 17571146 nnns volume:15 year:2022 number:1 pages:n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2022 1 n/a-n/a
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y doi (DE-627)DOAJ086907476 (DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC925-935 Seungho Ryu verfasserin aut Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels. Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis Diseases of the musculoskeletal system Madeline P. Casanova verfasserin aut Jonathan D. Moore verfasserin aut Adam C. Cady verfasserin aut Russell T. Baker verfasserin aut In Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Wiley, 2008 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a (DE-627)573742634 (DE-600)2440706-9 17571146 nnns volume:15 year:2022 number:1 pages:n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2022 1 n/a-n/a
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y doi (DE-627)DOAJ086907476 (DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC925-935 Seungho Ryu verfasserin aut Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels. Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis Diseases of the musculoskeletal system Madeline P. Casanova verfasserin aut Jonathan D. Moore verfasserin aut Adam C. Cady verfasserin aut Russell T. Baker verfasserin aut In Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Wiley, 2008 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a (DE-627)573742634 (DE-600)2440706-9 17571146 nnns volume:15 year:2022 number:1 pages:n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2022 1 n/a-n/a
language	English
source	In Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a volume:15 year:2022 number:1 pages:n/a-n/a
sourceStr	In Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a volume:15 year:2022 number:1 pages:n/a-n/a
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Seungho Ryu @@aut@@ Madeline P. Casanova @@aut@@ Jonathan D. Moore @@aut@@ Adam C. Cady @@aut@@ Russell T. Baker @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	573742634
id	DOAJ086907476
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ086907476</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413075201.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ086907476</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC925-935</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seungho Ryu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychometric evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient‐Reported Outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the musculoskeletal system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Madeline P. Casanova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan D. Moore</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adam C. Cady</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Russell T. Baker</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Wiley, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)573742634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2440706-9</subfield><subfield code="x">17571146</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:n/a-n/a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">n/a-n/a</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Seungho Ryu
spellingShingle	Seungho Ryu misc RC925-935 misc Psychometric evaluation misc Patient‐Reported Outcomes misc Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis misc Diseases of the musculoskeletal system Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form
authorStr	Seungho Ryu
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)573742634
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC925-935
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	17571146
topic_title	RC925-935 Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form Psychometric evaluation Patient‐Reported Outcomes Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis
topic	misc RC925-935 misc Psychometric evaluation misc Patient‐Reported Outcomes misc Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis misc Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
topic_unstemmed	misc RC925-935 misc Psychometric evaluation misc Patient‐Reported Outcomes misc Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis misc Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
topic_browse	misc RC925-935 misc Psychometric evaluation misc Patient‐Reported Outcomes misc Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis misc Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
hierarchy_parent_id	573742634
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)573742634 (DE-600)2440706-9
title	Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ086907476 (DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a
title_full	Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form
author_sort	Seungho Ryu
journal	Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
journalStr	Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Seungho Ryu Madeline P. Casanova Jonathan D. Moore Adam C. Cady Russell T. Baker
container_volume	15
class	RC925-935
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Seungho Ryu
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form
callnumber	RC925-935
title_auth	Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form
abstract	Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels.
abstractGer	Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels.
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form
url	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146
remote_bool	true
author2	Madeline P. Casanova Jonathan D. Moore Adam C. Cady Russell T. Baker
author2Str	Madeline P. Casanova Jonathan D. Moore Adam C. Cady Russell T. Baker
ppnlink	573742634
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y
callnumber-a	RC925-935
up_date	2024-07-03T23:22:32.122Z
_version_	1803602050021326848
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ086907476</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413075201.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230311s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ086907476</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC925-935</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seungho Ryu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Background The Foot Function Index Revised Short version (FFI‐RS) is a foot‐ and ankle‐ patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), developed from the Foot Function Index (FFI). Previous studies, estimating item parameters and multidimensional properties, have limitations properly establishing the measurement properties of the FFI‐RS. A multi‐faceted Rasch analysis with a larger sample would allow for a more robust validation approach to improve the clinical interpretation of the FFI‐RS using a multidimensional perspective. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS as a PROM of foot function. Method A total of 2184 patients with foot pathology who completed the FFI‐RS were included in the data. Data were extracted from the cloud‐based orthopedic and sports medicine global registry Surgical Outcome System (SOS). The psychometric properties of the FFI‐RS were assessed using a many‐faceted Rasch analysis that included model‐data fit, rating scale function, item‐person map (distribution of item difficulty and person ability), and item difficulty of the subscale. Results Two misfit items were discovered and deleted; 32‐items from the original FFI‐RS were retained. The 4‐item Likert scale functioned effectively and item difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.48), subscale difficulty (‐0.58 to 1.15), and person's foot function (‐6.62 to 6.24) had wide distributions. Conclusions Many‐faceted Rasch analysis revealed the FFI‐RS had sound psychometric properties using the many‐faceted Ranch analysis and retained 32 of the original items. Clinicians and researchers should consider weaknesses identified with items in the ‘Difficulty” subscale and future work should be conducted to modify or develop items that will more accurately evaluate a wide range of foot function levels.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychometric evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient‐Reported Outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Many‐Faceted Rasch analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Diseases of the musculoskeletal system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Madeline P. Casanova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan D. Moore</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adam C. Cady</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Russell T. Baker</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Wiley, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2022), 1, Seite n/a-n/a</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)573742634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2440706-9</subfield><subfield code="x">17571146</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:n/a-n/a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9810a168fa1f4bbe9196c7cb544e3b1a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00583-y</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1757-1146</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">n/a-n/a</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401457

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Many‐faceted rasch calibration of the foot function index‐revised short form

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?