How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains
With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics r...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Alexandra Ion [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Current Swedish Archaeology - Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023, 25(2017), 1 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2017 ; number:1 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ087612216 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ087612216 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230331015626.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230331s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.37718/CSA.2017.18 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ087612216 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a CC1-960 | |
100 | 0 | |a Alexandra Ion |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. | ||
650 | 4 | |a method | |
650 | 4 | |a narrative | |
653 | 0 | |a Archaeology | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Current Swedish Archaeology |d Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023 |g 25(2017), 1 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000158496 |x 20023901 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 25 |j 2017 |e 1 |
author_variant |
a i ai |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20023901:2017----::oitricpiaysnedsilnrtrvstntematfdaeerhot |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
callnumber-subject-code |
CC |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087612216 (DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng CC1-960 Alexandra Ion verfasserin aut How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. method narrative Archaeology In Current Swedish Archaeology Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023 25(2017), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ000158496 20023901 nnns volume:25 year:2017 number:1 https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 kostenfrei https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2017 1 |
spelling |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087612216 (DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng CC1-960 Alexandra Ion verfasserin aut How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. method narrative Archaeology In Current Swedish Archaeology Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023 25(2017), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ000158496 20023901 nnns volume:25 year:2017 number:1 https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 kostenfrei https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2017 1 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087612216 (DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng CC1-960 Alexandra Ion verfasserin aut How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. method narrative Archaeology In Current Swedish Archaeology Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023 25(2017), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ000158496 20023901 nnns volume:25 year:2017 number:1 https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 kostenfrei https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2017 1 |
allfieldsGer |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087612216 (DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng CC1-960 Alexandra Ion verfasserin aut How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. method narrative Archaeology In Current Swedish Archaeology Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023 25(2017), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ000158496 20023901 nnns volume:25 year:2017 number:1 https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 kostenfrei https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2017 1 |
allfieldsSound |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087612216 (DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng CC1-960 Alexandra Ion verfasserin aut How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. method narrative Archaeology In Current Swedish Archaeology Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023 25(2017), 1 (DE-627)DOAJ000158496 20023901 nnns volume:25 year:2017 number:1 https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 kostenfrei https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2017 1 |
language |
English |
source |
In Current Swedish Archaeology 25(2017), 1 volume:25 year:2017 number:1 |
sourceStr |
In Current Swedish Archaeology 25(2017), 1 volume:25 year:2017 number:1 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
method narrative Archaeology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Current Swedish Archaeology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Alexandra Ion @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ000158496 |
id |
DOAJ087612216 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ087612216</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230331015626.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230331s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.37718/CSA.2017.18</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ087612216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CC1-960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexandra Ion</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">narrative</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Archaeology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Current Swedish Archaeology</subfield><subfield code="d">Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2017), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000158496</subfield><subfield code="x">20023901</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
C - Historical Sciences |
author |
Alexandra Ion |
spellingShingle |
Alexandra Ion misc CC1-960 misc method misc narrative misc Archaeology How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains |
authorStr |
Alexandra Ion |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ000158496 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
CC1-960 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20023901 |
topic_title |
CC1-960 How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains method narrative |
topic |
misc CC1-960 misc method misc narrative misc Archaeology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc CC1-960 misc method misc narrative misc Archaeology |
topic_browse |
misc CC1-960 misc method misc narrative misc Archaeology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Current Swedish Archaeology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ000158496 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Current Swedish Archaeology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ000158496 |
title |
How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ087612216 (DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 |
title_full |
How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains |
author_sort |
Alexandra Ion |
journal |
Current Swedish Archaeology |
journalStr |
Current Swedish Archaeology |
callnumber-first-code |
C |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Alexandra Ion |
container_volume |
25 |
class |
CC1-960 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Alexandra Ion |
doi_str_mv |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 |
title_sort |
how interdisciplinary is interdisciplinarity? revisiting the impact of adna research for the archaeology of human remains |
callnumber |
CC1-960 |
title_auth |
How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains |
abstract |
With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. |
abstractGer |
With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. |
abstract_unstemmed |
With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains |
url |
https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18 https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187 https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283 https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355 https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
DOAJ000158496 |
callnumber-subject |
CC - Archaeology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.37718/CSA.2017.18 |
callnumber-a |
CC1-960 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T02:21:47.675Z |
_version_ |
1803613328039215104 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ087612216</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230331015626.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230331s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.37718/CSA.2017.18</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ087612216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJda069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CC1-960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexandra Ion</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How Interdisciplinary is Interdisciplinarity? Revisiting the Impact of aDNA Research for the Archaeology of Human Remains</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With this paper I propose a reflection on the way interdisciplinarity is framed in reference to the study of archaeological human remains. It is often taken for granted that interdisciplinarity is valuable for archaeology – but why should it be? By taking the case study of the way ancient genomics research is rewriting the ‘Neolithic Revolution’ narratives I show how the use of scientific methodologies in- fluences and biases the kind of work that gets done and the questions that are asked.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">narrative</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Archaeology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Current Swedish Archaeology</subfield><subfield code="d">Svenska Arkeologiska Samfundet, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2017), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ000158496</subfield><subfield code="x">20023901</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2017.18</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/da069ec68bd14a96824d60f30091b187</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://193.10.12.85:443/csa/article/view/283</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1102-7355</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2002-3901</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400133 |