Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India

Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak [verfasserIn] K A Narayan [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine - Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023, 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:6 ; year:2020 ; number:1 ; pages:47-55

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ087834995

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ087834995
003	DE-627
005	20230410102946.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230331s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ087834995
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RA1-1270
100	0		\|a M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators.
650		4	\|a health gap
650		4	\|a health indicators
650		4	\|a health inequities
650		4	\|a urban health
650		4	\|a urban health equity assessment and response tool
653		0	\|a Public aspects of medicine
700	0		\|a K A Narayan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine \|d Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023 \|g 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 \|w (DE-627)1683675940 \|x 26663120 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:6 \|g year:2020 \|g number:1 \|g pages:47-55
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 6 \|j 2020 \|e 1 \|h 47-55

Indexfelder

author_variant	m s d p n msdpn k a n kan
matchkey_str	article:26663120:2020----::eetooubnelhqiysesetnrsostoidctruigtmepnehoynls
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	RA
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087834995 (DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RA1-1270 M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak verfasserin aut Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators. health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool Public aspects of medicine K A Narayan verfasserin aut In Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)1683675940 26663120 nnns volume:6 year:2020 number:1 pages:47-55 https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b kostenfrei http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2020 1 47-55
spelling	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087834995 (DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RA1-1270 M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak verfasserin aut Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators. health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool Public aspects of medicine K A Narayan verfasserin aut In Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)1683675940 26663120 nnns volume:6 year:2020 number:1 pages:47-55 https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b kostenfrei http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2020 1 47-55
allfields_unstemmed	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087834995 (DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RA1-1270 M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak verfasserin aut Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators. health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool Public aspects of medicine K A Narayan verfasserin aut In Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)1683675940 26663120 nnns volume:6 year:2020 number:1 pages:47-55 https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b kostenfrei http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2020 1 47-55
allfieldsGer	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087834995 (DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RA1-1270 M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak verfasserin aut Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators. health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool Public aspects of medicine K A Narayan verfasserin aut In Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)1683675940 26663120 nnns volume:6 year:2020 number:1 pages:47-55 https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b kostenfrei http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2020 1 47-55
allfieldsSound	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 doi (DE-627)DOAJ087834995 (DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RA1-1270 M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak verfasserin aut Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators. health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool Public aspects of medicine K A Narayan verfasserin aut In Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 (DE-627)1683675940 26663120 nnns volume:6 year:2020 number:1 pages:47-55 https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b kostenfrei http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2020 1 47-55
language	English
source	In Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 volume:6 year:2020 number:1 pages:47-55
sourceStr	In Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine 6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55 volume:6 year:2020 number:1 pages:47-55
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool Public aspects of medicine
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
authorswithroles_txt_mv	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak @@aut@@ K A Narayan @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1683675940
id	DOAJ087834995
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ087834995</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410102946.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230331s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ087834995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RA1-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health gap</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health inequities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban health equity assessment and response tool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public aspects of medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K A Narayan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1683675940</subfield><subfield code="x">26663120</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:47-55</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">47-55</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak
spellingShingle	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak misc RA1-1270 misc health gap misc health indicators misc health inequities misc urban health misc urban health equity assessment and response tool misc Public aspects of medicine Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India
authorStr	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1683675940
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RA1-1270
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	26663120
topic_title	RA1-1270 Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India health gap health indicators health inequities urban health urban health equity assessment and response tool
topic	misc RA1-1270 misc health gap misc health indicators misc health inequities misc urban health misc urban health equity assessment and response tool misc Public aspects of medicine
topic_unstemmed	misc RA1-1270 misc health gap misc health indicators misc health inequities misc urban health misc urban health equity assessment and response tool misc Public aspects of medicine
topic_browse	misc RA1-1270 misc health gap misc health indicators misc health inequities misc urban health misc urban health equity assessment and response tool misc Public aspects of medicine
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
hierarchy_parent_id	1683675940
hierarchy_top_title	Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1683675940
title	Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ087834995 (DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b
title_full	Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India
author_sort	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak
journal	Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
journalStr	Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	47
author_browse	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak K A Narayan
container_volume	6
class	RA1-1270
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak
doi_str_mv	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	selection of urban health equity assessment and response tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in india
callnumber	RA1-1270
title_auth	Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India
abstract	Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators.
abstractGer	Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators.
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India
url	https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19 https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113
remote_bool	true
author2	K A Narayan
author2Str	K A Narayan
ppnlink	1683675940
callnumber-subject	RA - Public Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19
callnumber-a	RA1-1270
up_date	2024-07-03T14:14:34.498Z
_version_	1803567575335960576
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ087834995</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410102946.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230331s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ087834995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RA1-1270</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M Siva Durga Prasad Nayak</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: City health profile is a useful tool for understanding the health gap and to plan to close the health gap. Of the different tools available to draft a city health profile, the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (HEART) developed by the WHO Kobe Centre is one of the best among them. A list of core indicators of the Urban HEART varies from country to country. Aim: In this scenario, an attempt was made with an aim to choose feasible indicators in the Urban HEART to assess a city health profile in Indian setting. Material and Methods: The current study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted among different public health experts in India using an online survey technique. An online survey form was created to collect the public health expert's opinion and sent to public health experts. A total of 105 responses were collected. Statistical Analysis: The average opinion score for each indicator was measured. Item response theory analysis technique was used to calculate the feasibility score to categorize the indicators. Results: The average score of the 60 indicators ranged from 4.54 to 2.77. The feasibility score ranged from 4.13 to − 0.49. Of 60 indicators, 16 indicators were strongly recommended, 41 were recommended, and 3 indicators were optional indicators. Nineteen were highly feasible, 28 feasible, and 13 were less feasible indicators. Conclusion: The Urban HEART can be applied in Indian setting. Data collection can be started with feasible indicators and later can be extended to other indicators.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health gap</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">health inequities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">urban health equity assessment and response tool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public aspects of medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K A Narayan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian Journal of Community and Family Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2020), 1, Seite 47-55</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1683675940</subfield><subfield code="x">26663120</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:47-55</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCFM.IJCFM_72_19</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4874456c86c6459b8013dbeab6f6da1b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ijcfm.org/article.asp?issn=2395-2113;year=2020;volume=6;issue=1;spage=47;epage=55;aulast=Nayak</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2395-2113</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">47-55</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.40189

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Selection of Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool indicators using item response theory analysis to assess a city health profile in India

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?