Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models
Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two me...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Habib Ur Rehman [verfasserIn] Arif Hussain [verfasserIn] Waseem Haider [verfasserIn] Sayyed Ahmad Ali [verfasserIn] Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi [verfasserIn] Muhammad Huzaifa [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Energies - MDPI AG, 2008, 16(2023), 5, p 2444 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2023 ; number:5, p 2444 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/en16052444 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ088021335 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ088021335 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413054640.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230410s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/en16052444 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ088021335 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Habib Ur Rehman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. | ||
650 | 4 | |a artificial gorilla troops optimization | |
650 | 4 | |a distributed generation | |
650 | 4 | |a distributed system | |
650 | 4 | |a operating cost | |
650 | 4 | |a radial distribution network | |
650 | 4 | |a Tasmanian devil optimization | |
653 | 0 | |a Technology | |
653 | 0 | |a T | |
700 | 0 | |a Arif Hussain |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Waseem Haider |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Sayyed Ahmad Ali |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Muhammad Huzaifa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Energies |d MDPI AG, 2008 |g 16(2023), 5, p 2444 |w (DE-627)572083742 |w (DE-600)2437446-5 |x 19961073 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2023 |g number:5, p 2444 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 16 |j 2023 |e 5, p 2444 |
author_variant |
h u r hur a h ah w h wh s a a saa s a a k saak m h mh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:19961073:2023----::piapannoslrhtvlacvnwnbsdgfrcivntcneooioj |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.3390/en16052444 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088021335 (DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Ur Rehman verfasserin aut Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. artificial gorilla troops optimization distributed generation distributed system operating cost radial distribution network Tasmanian devil optimization Technology T Arif Hussain verfasserin aut Waseem Haider verfasserin aut Sayyed Ahmad Ali verfasserin aut Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi verfasserin aut Muhammad Huzaifa verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 16(2023), 5, p 2444 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:16 year:2023 number:5, p 2444 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2023 5, p 2444 |
spelling |
10.3390/en16052444 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088021335 (DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Ur Rehman verfasserin aut Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. artificial gorilla troops optimization distributed generation distributed system operating cost radial distribution network Tasmanian devil optimization Technology T Arif Hussain verfasserin aut Waseem Haider verfasserin aut Sayyed Ahmad Ali verfasserin aut Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi verfasserin aut Muhammad Huzaifa verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 16(2023), 5, p 2444 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:16 year:2023 number:5, p 2444 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2023 5, p 2444 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/en16052444 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088021335 (DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Ur Rehman verfasserin aut Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. artificial gorilla troops optimization distributed generation distributed system operating cost radial distribution network Tasmanian devil optimization Technology T Arif Hussain verfasserin aut Waseem Haider verfasserin aut Sayyed Ahmad Ali verfasserin aut Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi verfasserin aut Muhammad Huzaifa verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 16(2023), 5, p 2444 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:16 year:2023 number:5, p 2444 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2023 5, p 2444 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/en16052444 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088021335 (DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Ur Rehman verfasserin aut Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. artificial gorilla troops optimization distributed generation distributed system operating cost radial distribution network Tasmanian devil optimization Technology T Arif Hussain verfasserin aut Waseem Haider verfasserin aut Sayyed Ahmad Ali verfasserin aut Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi verfasserin aut Muhammad Huzaifa verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 16(2023), 5, p 2444 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:16 year:2023 number:5, p 2444 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2023 5, p 2444 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/en16052444 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088021335 (DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Habib Ur Rehman verfasserin aut Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. artificial gorilla troops optimization distributed generation distributed system operating cost radial distribution network Tasmanian devil optimization Technology T Arif Hussain verfasserin aut Waseem Haider verfasserin aut Sayyed Ahmad Ali verfasserin aut Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi verfasserin aut Muhammad Huzaifa verfasserin aut In Energies MDPI AG, 2008 16(2023), 5, p 2444 (DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 19961073 nnns volume:16 year:2023 number:5, p 2444 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2023 5, p 2444 |
language |
English |
source |
In Energies 16(2023), 5, p 2444 volume:16 year:2023 number:5, p 2444 |
sourceStr |
In Energies 16(2023), 5, p 2444 volume:16 year:2023 number:5, p 2444 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
artificial gorilla troops optimization distributed generation distributed system operating cost radial distribution network Tasmanian devil optimization Technology T |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Energies |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Habib Ur Rehman @@aut@@ Arif Hussain @@aut@@ Waseem Haider @@aut@@ Sayyed Ahmad Ali @@aut@@ Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi @@aut@@ Muhammad Huzaifa @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
572083742 |
id |
DOAJ088021335 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088021335</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413054640.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/en16052444</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088021335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Habib Ur Rehman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">artificial gorilla troops optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">distributed generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">distributed system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">operating cost</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">radial distribution network</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tasmanian devil optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arif Hussain</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Waseem Haider</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sayyed Ahmad Ali</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad Huzaifa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Energies</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2023), 5, p 2444</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)572083742</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2437446-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19961073</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 2444</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 2444</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Habib Ur Rehman |
spellingShingle |
Habib Ur Rehman misc artificial gorilla troops optimization misc distributed generation misc distributed system misc operating cost misc radial distribution network misc Tasmanian devil optimization misc Technology misc T Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models |
authorStr |
Habib Ur Rehman |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)572083742 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
19961073 |
topic_title |
Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models artificial gorilla troops optimization distributed generation distributed system operating cost radial distribution network Tasmanian devil optimization |
topic |
misc artificial gorilla troops optimization misc distributed generation misc distributed system misc operating cost misc radial distribution network misc Tasmanian devil optimization misc Technology misc T |
topic_unstemmed |
misc artificial gorilla troops optimization misc distributed generation misc distributed system misc operating cost misc radial distribution network misc Tasmanian devil optimization misc Technology misc T |
topic_browse |
misc artificial gorilla troops optimization misc distributed generation misc distributed system misc operating cost misc radial distribution network misc Tasmanian devil optimization misc Technology misc T |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Energies |
hierarchy_parent_id |
572083742 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Energies |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)572083742 (DE-600)2437446-5 |
title |
Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ088021335 (DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a |
title_full |
Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models |
author_sort |
Habib Ur Rehman |
journal |
Energies |
journalStr |
Energies |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Habib Ur Rehman Arif Hussain Waseem Haider Sayyed Ahmad Ali Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi Muhammad Huzaifa |
container_volume |
16 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Habib Ur Rehman |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/en16052444 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
optimal planning of solar photovoltaic (pv) and wind-based dgs for achieving techno-economic objectives across various load models |
title_auth |
Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models |
abstract |
Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. |
abstractGer |
Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
5, p 2444 |
title_short |
Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444 https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444 https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Arif Hussain Waseem Haider Sayyed Ahmad Ali Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi Muhammad Huzaifa |
author2Str |
Arif Hussain Waseem Haider Sayyed Ahmad Ali Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi Muhammad Huzaifa |
ppnlink |
572083742 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/en16052444 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:20:19.403Z |
_version_ |
1803571711868665856 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088021335</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413054640.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/en16052444</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088021335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Habib Ur Rehman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Optimal Planning of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind-Based DGs for Achieving Techno-Economic Objectives across Various Load Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Over the last few decades, distributed generation (DG) has become the most viable option in distribution systems (DSs) to mitigate the power losses caused by the substantial increase in electricity demand and to improve the voltage profile by enhancing power system reliability. In this study, two metaheuristic algorithms, artificial gorilla troops optimization (GTO) and Tasmanian devil optimization (TDO), are presented to examine the utilization of DGs, as well as the optimal placement and sizing in DSs, with a special emphasis on maximizing the voltage stability index and minimizing the total operating cost index and active power loss, along with the minimizing of voltage deviation. The robustness of the algorithms is examined on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus radial distribution networks (RDNs) for PV- and wind-based DGs. The obtained results are compared with the existing literature to validate the effectiveness of the algorithms. The reduction in active power loss is 93.15% and 96.87% of the initial value for the 33-bus and 69-bus RDNs, respectively, while the other parameters, i.e., operating cost index, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index, are also improved. This validates the efficiency of the algorithms. The proposed study is also carried out by considering different voltage-dependent load models, including industrial, residential, and commercial types.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">artificial gorilla troops optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">distributed generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">distributed system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">operating cost</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">radial distribution network</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tasmanian devil optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arif Hussain</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Waseem Haider</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sayyed Ahmad Ali</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad Huzaifa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Energies</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2023), 5, p 2444</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)572083742</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2437446-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19961073</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 2444</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052444</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4b2d2122c03844a48a0cea123235142a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2444</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 2444</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4004374 |