Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era
Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executiv...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Alireza Ali Soufi [verfasserIn] Mohammad Reza Sadeghi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Persisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: دولتپژوهی - Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023, 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:2021 ; number:25 ; pages:179-203 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ088580911 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ088580911 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414012130.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230410s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||per c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ088580911 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a per | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JF20-2112 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a JQ1-6651 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Alireza Ali Soufi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a persian constitution of 1906 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reza shah | |
| 650 | 4 | |a justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a interpretation of article 82 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a independence of judges | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political institutions and public administration (General) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t دولتپژوهی |d Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023 |g 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 |w (DE-627)1760618659 |x 24766828 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2021 |g number:25 |g pages:179-203 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 7 |j 2021 |e 25 |h 179-203 | ||
| author_variant |
a a s aas m r s mrs |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24766828:2021----::xrlglcintritrrtril8oteosiuinlmn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
JF |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088580911 (DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JF20-2112 JQ1-6651 Alireza Ali Soufi verfasserin aut Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. persian constitution of 1906 reza shah justice interpretation of article 82 independence of judges Political institutions and public administration (General) Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut In دولتپژوهی Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 (DE-627)1760618659 24766828 nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:25 pages:179-203 https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b kostenfrei https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2021 25 179-203 |
| spelling |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088580911 (DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JF20-2112 JQ1-6651 Alireza Ali Soufi verfasserin aut Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. persian constitution of 1906 reza shah justice interpretation of article 82 independence of judges Political institutions and public administration (General) Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut In دولتپژوهی Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 (DE-627)1760618659 24766828 nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:25 pages:179-203 https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b kostenfrei https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2021 25 179-203 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088580911 (DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JF20-2112 JQ1-6651 Alireza Ali Soufi verfasserin aut Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. persian constitution of 1906 reza shah justice interpretation of article 82 independence of judges Political institutions and public administration (General) Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut In دولتپژوهی Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 (DE-627)1760618659 24766828 nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:25 pages:179-203 https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b kostenfrei https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2021 25 179-203 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088580911 (DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JF20-2112 JQ1-6651 Alireza Ali Soufi verfasserin aut Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. persian constitution of 1906 reza shah justice interpretation of article 82 independence of judges Political institutions and public administration (General) Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut In دولتپژوهی Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 (DE-627)1760618659 24766828 nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:25 pages:179-203 https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b kostenfrei https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2021 25 179-203 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088580911 (DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per JF20-2112 JQ1-6651 Alireza Ali Soufi verfasserin aut Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. persian constitution of 1906 reza shah justice interpretation of article 82 independence of judges Political institutions and public administration (General) Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) Mohammad Reza Sadeghi verfasserin aut In دولتپژوهی Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 (DE-627)1760618659 24766828 nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:25 pages:179-203 https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b kostenfrei https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 7 2021 25 179-203 |
| language |
Persian |
| source |
In دولتپژوهی 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 volume:7 year:2021 number:25 pages:179-203 |
| sourceStr |
In دولتپژوهی 7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203 volume:7 year:2021 number:25 pages:179-203 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
persian constitution of 1906 reza shah justice interpretation of article 82 independence of judges Political institutions and public administration (General) Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
دولتپژوهی |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Alireza Ali Soufi @@aut@@ Mohammad Reza Sadeghi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760618659 |
| id |
DOAJ088580911 |
| language_de |
persisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088580911</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414012130.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088580911</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JF20-2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JQ1-6651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alireza Ali Soufi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">persian constitution of 1906</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reza shah</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interpretation of article 82</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">independence of judges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Reza Sadeghi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">دولتپژوهی</subfield><subfield code="d">Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760618659</subfield><subfield code="x">24766828</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:25</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:179-203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">25</subfield><subfield code="h">179-203</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
| author |
Alireza Ali Soufi |
| spellingShingle |
Alireza Ali Soufi misc JF20-2112 misc JQ1-6651 misc persian constitution of 1906 misc reza shah misc justice misc interpretation of article 82 misc independence of judges misc Political institutions and public administration (General) misc Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era |
| authorStr |
Alireza Ali Soufi |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760618659 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
JF20-2112 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24766828 |
| topic_title |
JF20-2112 JQ1-6651 Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era persian constitution of 1906 reza shah justice interpretation of article 82 independence of judges |
| topic |
misc JF20-2112 misc JQ1-6651 misc persian constitution of 1906 misc reza shah misc justice misc interpretation of article 82 misc independence of judges misc Political institutions and public administration (General) misc Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc JF20-2112 misc JQ1-6651 misc persian constitution of 1906 misc reza shah misc justice misc interpretation of article 82 misc independence of judges misc Political institutions and public administration (General) misc Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) |
| topic_browse |
misc JF20-2112 misc JQ1-6651 misc persian constitution of 1906 misc reza shah misc justice misc interpretation of article 82 misc independence of judges misc Political institutions and public administration (General) misc Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
دولتپژوهی |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760618659 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
دولتپژوهی |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760618659 |
| title |
Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ088580911 (DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b |
| title_full |
Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era |
| author_sort |
Alireza Ali Soufi |
| journal |
دولتپژوهی |
| journalStr |
دولتپژوهی |
| callnumber-first-code |
J |
| lang_code |
per |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
179 |
| author_browse |
Alireza Ali Soufi Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
| container_volume |
7 |
| class |
JF20-2112 JQ1-6651 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Alireza Ali Soufi |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
extra-legal actions to re-interpret article 82 of the constitutional amendment during reza shah era |
| callnumber |
JF20-2112 |
| title_auth |
Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era |
| abstract |
Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. |
| abstractGer |
Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
25 |
| title_short |
Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806 https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
| author2Str |
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi |
| ppnlink |
1760618659 |
| callnumber-subject |
JF - Public Administration |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621 |
| callnumber-a |
JF20-2112 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T18:27:00.544Z |
| _version_ |
1803583457160331265 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088580911</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414012130.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088580911</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JF20-2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JQ1-6651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alireza Ali Soufi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Extra-legal Actions to Re-interpret Article 82 of the Constitutional Amendment during Reza Shah Era</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reza Shah's policies regarding the judiciary system can be evaluated in the direction of The Realization of Modern Absolute Government which was as a kind of reconstruction and redefinition of the traditional order at pre-constitutional period. Therefore, the direct intervention of the executive branch in matters of justice and the neglect of principles 81 and 82 should be considered as the continuation of the controversy between traditional tyranny and the democratic order and constitutionalism. This Principles were widely violated at the earlier of this year. and continued and led to the presentation of an interpretation of principle 82. This interpretation, which disaffected the two principles in the same time, provided an apparently legal solution to the Minister of Justice in order to ignore the independence and defection of the justice and attempt to change the intervention of the judges. This research is done with the goal of considering the effective factors in Legitimize Government Domination in Courts, it has been conducted by descriptive- analytical approach, by documentary and library method and seeking to answer this fundamental question that, which are the main factors in the interpretation of principle 82 by the regime. The findings of the research presents that the authoritarian nature of the government was a source of pressure on the courts to issue voter sentences, and since some of the judges were not willing to cooperate within the framework of power, so to eliminate the legal barriers to their removal, the rule of interpretation of Article 82 Was drafted and approved.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">persian constitution of 1906</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reza shah</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interpretation of article 82</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">independence of judges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political institutions and public administration - Asia (Asian studies only)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Reza Sadeghi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">دولتپژوهی</subfield><subfield code="d">Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2021), 25, Seite 179-203</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760618659</subfield><subfield code="x">24766828</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:25</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:179-203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2021.38715.621</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/166a73fd150f4a8188e7950fb496e93b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_12885_225d5cdcbda183a433b32ce872270a67.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-2806</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6828</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">25</subfield><subfield code="h">179-203</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400448 |