Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF

The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Shohei Aoyama [verfasserIn] Masami Ouchi [verfasserIn] Yuichi Harikane [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: The Astrophysical Journal - IOP Publishing, 2022, 946(2023), 2, p 69
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:946 ; year:2023 ; number:2, p 69

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ088838307

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ088838307
003	DE-627
005	20230505015807.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230410s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ088838307
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QB460-466
100	0		\|a Shohei Aoyama \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations.
650		4	\|a Supernova neutrinos
650		4	\|a Core-collapse supernovae
650		4	\|a Optical observation
650		4	\|a Star formation
650		4	\|a Initial mass function
653		0	\|a Astrophysics
700	0		\|a Masami Ouchi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yuichi Harikane \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t The Astrophysical Journal \|d IOP Publishing, 2022 \|g 946(2023), 2, p 69 \|w (DE-627)269019219 \|w (DE-600)1473835-1 \|x 15384357 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:946 \|g year:2023 \|g number:2, p 69
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 946 \|j 2023 \|e 2, p 69

Indexfelder

author_variant	s a sa m o mo y h yh
matchkey_str	article:15384357:2023----::tlaiiilasucinmpoewtsproaaeadetioakrudomcvrgif
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
callnumber-subject-code	QB
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088838307 (DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Shohei Aoyama verfasserin aut Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations. Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function Astrophysics Masami Ouchi verfasserin aut Yuichi Harikane verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 946(2023), 2, p 69 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:946 year:2023 number:2, p 69 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 946 2023 2, p 69
spelling	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088838307 (DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Shohei Aoyama verfasserin aut Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations. Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function Astrophysics Masami Ouchi verfasserin aut Yuichi Harikane verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 946(2023), 2, p 69 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:946 year:2023 number:2, p 69 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 946 2023 2, p 69
allfields_unstemmed	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088838307 (DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Shohei Aoyama verfasserin aut Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations. Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function Astrophysics Masami Ouchi verfasserin aut Yuichi Harikane verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 946(2023), 2, p 69 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:946 year:2023 number:2, p 69 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 946 2023 2, p 69
allfieldsGer	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088838307 (DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Shohei Aoyama verfasserin aut Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations. Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function Astrophysics Masami Ouchi verfasserin aut Yuichi Harikane verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 946(2023), 2, p 69 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:946 year:2023 number:2, p 69 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 946 2023 2, p 69
allfieldsSound	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088838307 (DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Shohei Aoyama verfasserin aut Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations. Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function Astrophysics Masami Ouchi verfasserin aut Yuichi Harikane verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 946(2023), 2, p 69 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:946 year:2023 number:2, p 69 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 946 2023 2, p 69
language	English
source	In The Astrophysical Journal 946(2023), 2, p 69 volume:946 year:2023 number:2, p 69
sourceStr	In The Astrophysical Journal 946(2023), 2, p 69 volume:946 year:2023 number:2, p 69
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function Astrophysics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	The Astrophysical Journal
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Shohei Aoyama @@aut@@ Masami Ouchi @@aut@@ Yuichi Harikane @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	269019219
id	DOAJ088838307
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088838307</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505015807.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3847/1538-4357/acba87</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088838307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QB460-466</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shohei Aoyama</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supernova neutrinos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Core-collapse supernovae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optical observation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Star formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Initial mass function</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Astrophysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Masami Ouchi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuichi Harikane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Astrophysical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">IOP Publishing, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">946(2023), 2, p 69</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)269019219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473835-1</subfield><subfield code="x">15384357</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:946</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">946</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 69</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Shohei Aoyama
spellingShingle	Shohei Aoyama misc QB460-466 misc Supernova neutrinos misc Core-collapse supernovae misc Optical observation misc Star formation misc Initial mass function misc Astrophysics Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF
authorStr	Shohei Aoyama
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)269019219
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QB460-466
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	15384357
topic_title	QB460-466 Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF Supernova neutrinos Core-collapse supernovae Optical observation Star formation Initial mass function
topic	misc QB460-466 misc Supernova neutrinos misc Core-collapse supernovae misc Optical observation misc Star formation misc Initial mass function misc Astrophysics
topic_unstemmed	misc QB460-466 misc Supernova neutrinos misc Core-collapse supernovae misc Optical observation misc Star formation misc Initial mass function misc Astrophysics
topic_browse	misc QB460-466 misc Supernova neutrinos misc Core-collapse supernovae misc Optical observation misc Star formation misc Initial mass function misc Astrophysics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	The Astrophysical Journal
hierarchy_parent_id	269019219
hierarchy_top_title	The Astrophysical Journal
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1
title	Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ088838307 (DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b
title_full	Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF
author_sort	Shohei Aoyama
journal	The Astrophysical Journal
journalStr	The Astrophysical Journal
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Shohei Aoyama Masami Ouchi Yuichi Harikane
container_volume	946
class	QB460-466
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Shohei Aoyama
doi_str_mv	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	stellar initial mass function (imf) probed with supernova rates and neutrino background: cosmic-average imf slope is ≃2–3 similar to the salpeter imf
callnumber	QB460-466
title_auth	Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF
abstract	The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations.
abstractGer	The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations.
abstract_unstemmed	The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2, p 69
title_short	Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF
url	https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87 https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357
remote_bool	true
author2	Masami Ouchi Yuichi Harikane
author2Str	Masami Ouchi Yuichi Harikane
ppnlink	269019219
callnumber-subject	QB - Astronomy
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3847/1538-4357/acba87
callnumber-a	QB460-466
up_date	2024-07-03T19:47:25.611Z
_version_	1803588516566794240
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088838307</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505015807.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3847/1538-4357/acba87</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088838307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QB460-466</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shohei Aoyama</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is expressed by ϕ ( m ) ∝ m ^− ^α with the slope α , and known as a poorly constrained but very important function in studies of star and galaxy formation. There are no sensible observational constraints on the IMF slopes beyond the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Here we combine two sets of observational results, (1) cosmic densities of core-collapse supernova (CCSN) explosion rates and (2) cosmic far-UV radiation (and infrared reradiation) densities, which are sensitive to massive (≃8–50 M _⊙ ) and moderately massive (≃2.5–7 M _⊙ ) stars, respectively, and constrain the IMF slope at m < 1 M _⊙ with a freedom of redshift evolution. Although no redshift evolution is identified beyond the uncertainties, we find that the cosmic-average IMF slope at z = 0 is α = 1.8–3.2 at the 95% confidence level that is comparable with the Salpeter IMF, α = 2.35, which marks the first constraint on the cosmic-average IMF. We show a forecast for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope supernova survey that will provide significantly strong constraints on the IMF slope with δ α ≃ 0.5 over z = 0–2. Moreover, as for an independent IMF probe instead of (1), we suggest to use diffuse supernovae neutrino background (DSNB), relic neutrinos from CCSNe. We expect that the Hyper-Kamiokande neutrino observations over 20 yr will improve the constraints on the IMF slope and the redshift evolution significantly better than those obtained today, if the systematic uncertainties of DSNB production physics are reduced in the future numerical simulations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supernova neutrinos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Core-collapse supernovae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optical observation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Star formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Initial mass function</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Astrophysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Masami Ouchi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yuichi Harikane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Astrophysical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">IOP Publishing, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">946(2023), 2, p 69</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)269019219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473835-1</subfield><subfield code="x">15384357</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:946</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b5c13cff496841fa8f8aaf4d85488a3b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acba87</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">946</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 69</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401005

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Stellar Initial Mass Function (IMF) Probed with Supernova Rates and Neutrino Background: Cosmic-average IMF Slope Is ≃2–3 Similar to the Salpeter IMF

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?