Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network
To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be v...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Min Ah Kang [verfasserIn] Cheong Hee Park [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: IEEE Access - IEEE, 2014, 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2023 ; pages:26114-26124 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ088908844 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ088908844 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230410123300.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230410s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ088908844 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TK1-9971 | |
100 | 0 | |a Min Ah Kang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Blast wave propagation | |
650 | 4 | |a blast response | |
650 | 4 | |a damage assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a CNN | |
650 | 4 | |a deep learning | |
650 | 4 | |a CFD | |
653 | 0 | |a Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering | |
700 | 0 | |a Cheong Hee Park |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t IEEE Access |d IEEE, 2014 |g 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 |w (DE-627)728440385 |w (DE-600)2687964-5 |x 21693536 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2023 |g pages:26114-26124 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/ |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2023 |h 26114-26124 |
author_variant |
m a k mak c h p chp |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21693536:2023----::rdcinfekrsueylswvpoaainewebidnssnaodtoa |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TK |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088908844 (DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Min Ah Kang verfasserin aut Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. Blast wave propagation blast response damage assessment CNN deep learning CFD Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Cheong Hee Park verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:11 year:2023 pages:26114-26124 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 26114-26124 |
spelling |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088908844 (DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Min Ah Kang verfasserin aut Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. Blast wave propagation blast response damage assessment CNN deep learning CFD Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Cheong Hee Park verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:11 year:2023 pages:26114-26124 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 26114-26124 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088908844 (DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Min Ah Kang verfasserin aut Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. Blast wave propagation blast response damage assessment CNN deep learning CFD Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Cheong Hee Park verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:11 year:2023 pages:26114-26124 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 26114-26124 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088908844 (DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Min Ah Kang verfasserin aut Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. Blast wave propagation blast response damage assessment CNN deep learning CFD Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Cheong Hee Park verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:11 year:2023 pages:26114-26124 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 26114-26124 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 doi (DE-627)DOAJ088908844 (DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Min Ah Kang verfasserin aut Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. Blast wave propagation blast response damage assessment CNN deep learning CFD Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Cheong Hee Park verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:11 year:2023 pages:26114-26124 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 26114-26124 |
language |
English |
source |
In IEEE Access 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 volume:11 year:2023 pages:26114-26124 |
sourceStr |
In IEEE Access 11(2023), Seite 26114-26124 volume:11 year:2023 pages:26114-26124 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Blast wave propagation blast response damage assessment CNN deep learning CFD Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
IEEE Access |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Min Ah Kang @@aut@@ Cheong Hee Park @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
728440385 |
id |
DOAJ088908844 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088908844</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410123300.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088908844</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK1-9971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Min Ah Kang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Blast wave propagation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">blast response</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">damage assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CNN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deep learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheong Hee Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE Access</subfield><subfield code="d">IEEE, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2023), Seite 26114-26124</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)728440385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2687964-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21693536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:26114-26124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">26114-26124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Min Ah Kang |
spellingShingle |
Min Ah Kang misc TK1-9971 misc Blast wave propagation misc blast response misc damage assessment misc CNN misc deep learning misc CFD misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network |
authorStr |
Min Ah Kang |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)728440385 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TK1-9971 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
21693536 |
topic_title |
TK1-9971 Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network Blast wave propagation blast response damage assessment CNN deep learning CFD |
topic |
misc TK1-9971 misc Blast wave propagation misc blast response misc damage assessment misc CNN misc deep learning misc CFD misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TK1-9971 misc Blast wave propagation misc blast response misc damage assessment misc CNN misc deep learning misc CFD misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering |
topic_browse |
misc TK1-9971 misc Blast wave propagation misc blast response misc damage assessment misc CNN misc deep learning misc CFD misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
IEEE Access |
hierarchy_parent_id |
728440385 |
hierarchy_top_title |
IEEE Access |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 |
title |
Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ088908844 (DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 |
title_full |
Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network |
author_sort |
Min Ah Kang |
journal |
IEEE Access |
journalStr |
IEEE Access |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
26114 |
author_browse |
Min Ah Kang Cheong Hee Park |
container_volume |
11 |
class |
TK1-9971 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Min Ah Kang |
doi_str_mv |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
prediction of peak pressure by blast wave propagation between buildings using a conditional 3d convolutional neural network |
callnumber |
TK1-9971 |
title_auth |
Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network |
abstract |
To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. |
abstractGer |
To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. |
abstract_unstemmed |
To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/ https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Cheong Hee Park |
author2Str |
Cheong Hee Park |
ppnlink |
728440385 |
callnumber-subject |
TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345 |
callnumber-a |
TK1-9971 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T20:11:09.336Z |
_version_ |
1803590009448562688 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ088908844</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230410123300.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230410s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ088908844</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK1-9971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Min Ah Kang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Prediction of Peak Pressure by Blast Wave Propagation Between Buildings Using a Conditional 3D Convolutional Neural Network</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To predict the damage resulting from an explosion in the middle of a city, where buildings are concentrated, the peak pressure reaching the walls of the buildings or in between buildings should be accurately and rapidly calculated. However, predicting peak pressure between buildings is known to be very difficult because of the diffraction and reflection of blast waves, which have generally been analyzed by numerical analysis methods. However, numerical analysis is not suitable in a military operation environment which requires rapid analysis, because it takes considerable time and resources. This study proposes a deep neural network that quickly and accurately predicts the peak pressure caused by the propagation of blast waves, for the effective analysis of weapon effectiveness and damage in urban environments. The proposed deep learning model is based on a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) model that processes the spatial information of explosion and measurement in the 3D spaces using 3D kernels. To predict the peak pressure between buildings separated by an arbitrary distance using a single model, we also propose using conditional convolution, which modulates the prediction output according to the building distance. The proposed models were trained with a dataset constructed through finite element analysis with various building distances, explosion locations, and explosive weights. The experiment with a fixed building distance showed that the relative error of the proposed 3D CNN is less than 7%, which is 2.5 times more accurate than a simple multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. For unseen building layouts, the conditional 3D convolution showed 3.6 times lower error than the MLP model, demonstrating the effectiveness of the conditional convolution for prediction in arbitrary building layouts. Most importantly, the proposed deep learning models took less than one minute per prediction, which is significantly faster than finite element analysis, which takes 6 to 8 hours to analyze a single simulation case.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Blast wave propagation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">blast response</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">damage assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CNN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deep learning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheong Hee Park</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE Access</subfield><subfield code="d">IEEE, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2023), Seite 26114-26124</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)728440385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2687964-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21693536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:26114-26124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257345</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/29d0dbdd0c46442092dd6fcda60f48f1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070763/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">26114-26124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4011183 |