An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)

Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspensi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Kyungho Won [verfasserIn] Eu Ddeum Choi [verfasserIn] Keumsun Kim [verfasserIn] Hae Won Jung [verfasserIn] Il Sheob Shin [verfasserIn] Seongsig Hong [verfasserIn] Cécile Segonzac [verfasserIn] Young Jin Kim [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	pear pear scab resistance screening

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: The Plant Pathology Journal - Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016, 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:39 ; year:2023 ; number:2 ; pages:228-233

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ089109635

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ089109635
003	DE-627
005	20230505002453.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230505s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ089109635
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a SB1-1110
100	0		\|a Kyungho Won \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	3	\|a An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan.
650		4	\|a pear
650		4	\|a pear scab
650		4	\|a resistance screening
653		0	\|a Plant culture
700	0		\|a Eu Ddeum Choi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Keumsun Kim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hae Won Jung \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Il Sheob Shin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Seongsig Hong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Cécile Segonzac \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Young Jin Kim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t The Plant Pathology Journal \|d Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016 \|g 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 \|w (DE-627)615129951 \|w (DE-600)2529195-6 \|x 20939280 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:39 \|g year:2023 \|g number:2 \|g pages:228-233
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_252
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 39 \|j 2023 \|e 2 \|h 228-233

Indexfelder

author_variant	k w kw e d c edc k k kk h w j hwj i s s iss s h sh c s cs y j k yjk
matchkey_str	article:20939280:2023----::nlentvmtoteautrssactpasa
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
callnumber-subject-code	SB
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089109635 (DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Kyungho Won verfasserin aut An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola) 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan. pear pear scab resistance screening Plant culture Eu Ddeum Choi verfasserin aut Keumsun Kim verfasserin aut Hae Won Jung verfasserin aut Il Sheob Shin verfasserin aut Seongsig Hong verfasserin aut Cécile Segonzac verfasserin aut Young Jin Kim verfasserin aut In The Plant Pathology Journal Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 (DE-627)615129951 (DE-600)2529195-6 20939280 nnns volume:39 year:2023 number:2 pages:228-233 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 kostenfrei http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 39 2023 2 228-233
spelling	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089109635 (DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Kyungho Won verfasserin aut An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola) 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan. pear pear scab resistance screening Plant culture Eu Ddeum Choi verfasserin aut Keumsun Kim verfasserin aut Hae Won Jung verfasserin aut Il Sheob Shin verfasserin aut Seongsig Hong verfasserin aut Cécile Segonzac verfasserin aut Young Jin Kim verfasserin aut In The Plant Pathology Journal Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 (DE-627)615129951 (DE-600)2529195-6 20939280 nnns volume:39 year:2023 number:2 pages:228-233 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 kostenfrei http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 39 2023 2 228-233
allfields_unstemmed	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089109635 (DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Kyungho Won verfasserin aut An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola) 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan. pear pear scab resistance screening Plant culture Eu Ddeum Choi verfasserin aut Keumsun Kim verfasserin aut Hae Won Jung verfasserin aut Il Sheob Shin verfasserin aut Seongsig Hong verfasserin aut Cécile Segonzac verfasserin aut Young Jin Kim verfasserin aut In The Plant Pathology Journal Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 (DE-627)615129951 (DE-600)2529195-6 20939280 nnns volume:39 year:2023 number:2 pages:228-233 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 kostenfrei http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 39 2023 2 228-233
allfieldsGer	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089109635 (DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Kyungho Won verfasserin aut An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola) 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan. pear pear scab resistance screening Plant culture Eu Ddeum Choi verfasserin aut Keumsun Kim verfasserin aut Hae Won Jung verfasserin aut Il Sheob Shin verfasserin aut Seongsig Hong verfasserin aut Cécile Segonzac verfasserin aut Young Jin Kim verfasserin aut In The Plant Pathology Journal Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 (DE-627)615129951 (DE-600)2529195-6 20939280 nnns volume:39 year:2023 number:2 pages:228-233 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 kostenfrei http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 39 2023 2 228-233
allfieldsSound	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089109635 (DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Kyungho Won verfasserin aut An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola) 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan. pear pear scab resistance screening Plant culture Eu Ddeum Choi verfasserin aut Keumsun Kim verfasserin aut Hae Won Jung verfasserin aut Il Sheob Shin verfasserin aut Seongsig Hong verfasserin aut Cécile Segonzac verfasserin aut Young Jin Kim verfasserin aut In The Plant Pathology Journal Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 (DE-627)615129951 (DE-600)2529195-6 20939280 nnns volume:39 year:2023 number:2 pages:228-233 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 kostenfrei http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 39 2023 2 228-233
language	English
source	In The Plant Pathology Journal 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 volume:39 year:2023 number:2 pages:228-233
sourceStr	In The Plant Pathology Journal 39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233 volume:39 year:2023 number:2 pages:228-233
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	pear pear scab resistance screening Plant culture
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	The Plant Pathology Journal
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Kyungho Won @@aut@@ Eu Ddeum Choi @@aut@@ Keumsun Kim @@aut@@ Hae Won Jung @@aut@@ Il Sheob Shin @@aut@@ Seongsig Hong @@aut@@ Cécile Segonzac @@aut@@ Young Jin Kim @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	615129951
id	DOAJ089109635
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ089109635</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505002453.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ089109635</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyungho Won</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pear scab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">resistance screening</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eu Ddeum Choi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keumsun Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hae Won Jung</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Il Sheob Shin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seongsig Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cécile Segonzac</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Young Jin Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Plant Pathology Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)615129951</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2529195-6</subfield><subfield code="x">20939280</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:39</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:228-233</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">39</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">228-233</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	S - Agriculture
author	Kyungho Won
spellingShingle	Kyungho Won misc SB1-1110 misc pear misc pear scab misc resistance screening misc Plant culture An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)
authorStr	Kyungho Won
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)615129951
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	SB1-1110
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20939280
topic_title	SB1-1110 An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola) pear pear scab resistance screening
topic	misc SB1-1110 misc pear misc pear scab misc resistance screening misc Plant culture
topic_unstemmed	misc SB1-1110 misc pear misc pear scab misc resistance screening misc Plant culture
topic_browse	misc SB1-1110 misc pear misc pear scab misc resistance screening misc Plant culture
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	The Plant Pathology Journal
hierarchy_parent_id	615129951
hierarchy_top_title	The Plant Pathology Journal
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)615129951 (DE-600)2529195-6
title	An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ089109635 (DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130
title_full	An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)
author_sort	Kyungho Won
journal	The Plant Pathology Journal
journalStr	The Plant Pathology Journal
callnumber-first-code	S
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	228
author_browse	Kyungho Won Eu Ddeum Choi Keumsun Kim Hae Won Jung Il Sheob Shin Seongsig Hong Cécile Segonzac Young Jin Kim
container_volume	39
class	SB1-1110
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Kyungho Won
doi_str_mv	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	alternative method to evaluate resistance to pear scab (venturia nashicola)
callnumber	SB1-1110
title_auth	An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)
abstract	Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan.
abstractGer	Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan.
abstract_unstemmed	Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)
url	https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006 https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130 http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254 https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280
remote_bool	true
author2	Eu Ddeum Choi Keumsun Kim Hae Won Jung Il Sheob Shin Seongsig Hong Cécile Segonzac Young Jin Kim
author2Str	Eu Ddeum Choi Keumsun Kim Hae Won Jung Il Sheob Shin Seongsig Hong Cécile Segonzac Young Jin Kim
ppnlink	615129951
callnumber-subject	SB - Plant Culture
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006
callnumber-a	SB1-1110
up_date	2024-07-03T21:18:27.630Z
_version_	1803594243911974912
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ089109635</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230505002453.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ089109635</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyungho Won</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Two pear cultivars with different degrees of resistance to Venturia nashicola were evaluated on the basis of a disease severity rating for pear scab resistance under controlled environmental condition. Two inoculation techniques were tested: the procedure for inoculation by dropping conidia suspension of V. nashicola; the procedure by deposition of agar plug on the abaxial surface of pear leaves. All tested cultivars resulted in blight symptoms on the inoculated leaves and became spread to uninoculated region or other leaves. Although both methods provide satisfactory infection of V. nashicola on pear leaves, the mycelial plug method of inoculation was more reliable than the spray inoculation method for the evaluation of pear scab disease resistance. The incubation period of V. nashicola in the resistant pear cultivar, Greensis was longer than that in the susceptible cultivar, Hwasan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pear scab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">resistance screening</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eu Ddeum Choi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keumsun Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hae Won Jung</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Il Sheob Shin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seongsig Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cécile Segonzac</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Young Jin Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Plant Pathology Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Hanrimwon Publishing Company, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">39(2023), 2, Seite 228-233</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)615129951</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2529195-6</subfield><subfield code="x">20939280</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:39</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:228-233</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2023.0006</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ae623ec1725947bab7ed16828f206130</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://ppjonline.org/upload/pdf/PPJ-NT-01-2023-0006.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1598-2254</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2093-9280</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">39</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">228-233</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4018383

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

An Alternative Method to Evaluate Resistance to Pear Scab (Venturia nashicola)

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?