Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jong-Min Lee [verfasserIn] Jae-Yoon Kim [verfasserIn] Hyun-Seok Song [verfasserIn] Yun-Jae Kim [verfasserIn] Jin-Weon Kim [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Nuclear Engineering and Technology - Elsevier, 2016, 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:55 ; year:2023 ; number:5 ; pages:1616-1629 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ089125991 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ089125991 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230526112459.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230505s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TK9001-9401 | |
100 | 0 | |a Jong-Min Lee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. | ||
650 | 4 | |a ASME strain-based assessment method | |
650 | 4 | |a Experimental validation | |
650 | 4 | |a Finite element analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading | |
653 | 0 | |a Nuclear engineering. Atomic power | |
700 | 0 | |a Jae-Yoon Kim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hyun-Seok Song |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Yun-Jae Kim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jin-Weon Kim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Nuclear Engineering and Technology |d Elsevier, 2016 |g 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 |w (DE-627)63243855X |w (DE-600)2566624-1 |x 17385733 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2023 |g number:5 |g pages:1616-1629 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 55 |j 2023 |e 5 |h 1616-1629 |
author_variant |
j m l jml j y k jyk h s s hss y j k yjk j w k jwk |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:17385733:2023----::xeietlaiainfsetanaesimcsesetehd |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TK |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629 |
language |
English |
source |
In Nuclear Engineering and Technology 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 |
sourceStr |
In Nuclear Engineering and Technology 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jong-Min Lee @@aut@@ Jae-Yoon Kim @@aut@@ Hyun-Seok Song @@aut@@ Yun-Jae Kim @@aut@@ Jin-Weon Kim @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
63243855X |
id |
DOAJ089125991 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ089125991</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112459.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ089125991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jong-Min Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ASME strain-based assessment method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finite element analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yoon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Seok Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yun-Jae Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Weon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Engineering and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)63243855X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2566624-1</subfield><subfield code="x">17385733</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:55</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1616-1629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">55</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">1616-1629</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Jong-Min Lee |
spellingShingle |
Jong-Min Lee misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data |
authorStr |
Jong-Min Lee |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)63243855X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TK9001-9401 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
17385733 |
topic_title |
TK9001-9401 Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading |
topic |
misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
topic_browse |
misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
63243855X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 |
title |
Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 |
title_full |
Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data |
author_sort |
Jong-Min Lee |
journal |
Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
journalStr |
Nuclear Engineering and Technology |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1616 |
author_browse |
Jong-Min Lee Jae-Yoon Kim Hyun-Seok Song Yun-Jae Kim Jin-Weon Kim |
container_volume |
55 |
class |
TK9001-9401 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jong-Min Lee |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
experimental validation of asme strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data |
callnumber |
TK9001-9401 |
title_auth |
Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data |
abstract |
To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. |
abstractGer |
To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. |
abstract_unstemmed |
To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Jae-Yoon Kim Hyun-Seok Song Yun-Jae Kim Jin-Weon Kim |
author2Str |
Jae-Yoon Kim Hyun-Seok Song Yun-Jae Kim Jin-Weon Kim |
ppnlink |
63243855X |
callnumber-subject |
TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 |
callnumber-a |
TK9001-9401 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:24:00.773Z |
_version_ |
1803594593232486400 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ089125991</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112459.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ089125991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jong-Min Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ASME strain-based assessment method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finite element analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yoon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Seok Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yun-Jae Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Weon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Engineering and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)63243855X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2566624-1</subfield><subfield code="x">17385733</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:55</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1616-1629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">55</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">1616-1629</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3989286 |