Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data

To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Jong-Min Lee [verfasserIn] Jae-Yoon Kim [verfasserIn] Hyun-Seok Song [verfasserIn] Yun-Jae Kim [verfasserIn] Jin-Weon Kim [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Nuclear Engineering and Technology - Elsevier, 2016, 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:55 ; year:2023 ; number:5 ; pages:1616-1629

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ089125991

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ089125991
003	DE-627
005	20230526112459.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230505s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ089125991
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TK9001-9401
100	0		\|a Jong-Min Lee \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.
650		4	\|a ASME strain-based assessment method
650		4	\|a Experimental validation
650		4	\|a Finite element analysis
650		4	\|a Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading
653		0	\|a Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
700	0		\|a Jae-Yoon Kim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hyun-Seok Song \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yun-Jae Kim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jin-Weon Kim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Nuclear Engineering and Technology \|d Elsevier, 2016 \|g 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 \|w (DE-627)63243855X \|w (DE-600)2566624-1 \|x 17385733 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:55 \|g year:2023 \|g number:5 \|g pages:1616-1629
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 55 \|j 2023 \|e 5 \|h 1616-1629

Indexfelder

author_variant	j m l jml j y k jyk h s s hss y j k yjk j w k jwk
matchkey_str	article:17385733:2023----::xeietlaiainfsetanaesimcsesetehd
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
callnumber-subject-code	TK
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629
spelling	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 doi (DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK9001-9401 Jong-Min Lee verfasserin aut Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data. ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Jae-Yoon Kim verfasserin aut Hyun-Seok Song verfasserin aut Yun-Jae Kim verfasserin aut Jin-Weon Kim verfasserin aut In Nuclear Engineering and Technology Elsevier, 2016 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 (DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1 17385733 nnns volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 55 2023 5 1616-1629
language	English
source	In Nuclear Engineering and Technology 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629
sourceStr	In Nuclear Engineering and Technology 55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629 volume:55 year:2023 number:5 pages:1616-1629
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Nuclear Engineering and Technology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Jong-Min Lee @@aut@@ Jae-Yoon Kim @@aut@@ Hyun-Seok Song @@aut@@ Yun-Jae Kim @@aut@@ Jin-Weon Kim @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	63243855X
id	DOAJ089125991
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ089125991</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112459.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ089125991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jong-Min Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ASME strain-based assessment method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finite element analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yoon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Seok Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yun-Jae Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Weon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Engineering and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)63243855X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2566624-1</subfield><subfield code="x">17385733</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:55</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1616-1629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">55</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">1616-1629</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Jong-Min Lee
spellingShingle	Jong-Min Lee misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
authorStr	Jong-Min Lee
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)63243855X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TK9001-9401
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	17385733
topic_title	TK9001-9401 Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data ASME strain-based assessment method Experimental validation Finite element analysis Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading
topic	misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
topic_unstemmed	misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
topic_browse	misc TK9001-9401 misc ASME strain-based assessment method misc Experimental validation misc Finite element analysis misc Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading misc Nuclear engineering. Atomic power
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Nuclear Engineering and Technology
hierarchy_parent_id	63243855X
hierarchy_top_title	Nuclear Engineering and Technology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)63243855X (DE-600)2566624-1
title	Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ089125991 (DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04
title_full	Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
author_sort	Jong-Min Lee
journal	Nuclear Engineering and Technology
journalStr	Nuclear Engineering and Technology
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	1616
author_browse	Jong-Min Lee Jae-Yoon Kim Hyun-Seok Song Yun-Jae Kim Jin-Weon Kim
container_volume	55
class	TK9001-9401
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Jong-Min Lee
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	experimental validation of asme strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
callnumber	TK9001-9401
title_auth	Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
abstract	To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.
abstractGer	To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.
abstract_unstemmed	To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5
title_short	Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027 https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694 https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733
remote_bool	true
author2	Jae-Yoon Kim Hyun-Seok Song Yun-Jae Kim Jin-Weon Kim
author2Str	Jae-Yoon Kim Hyun-Seok Song Yun-Jae Kim Jin-Weon Kim
ppnlink	63243855X
callnumber-subject	TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027
callnumber-a	TK9001-9401
up_date	2024-07-03T21:24:00.773Z
_version_	1803594593232486400
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ089125991</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112459.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ089125991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK9001-9401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jong-Min Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To quantify the conservatism of existing ASME strain-based evaluation methods for seismic loading, this paper presents very low cycle fatigue test data of elbows under various cyclic loading conditions and comparison of evaluation results with experimental failure cycles. For strain-based evaluation methods, the method presented in ASME BPVC CC N-900 and Sec. VIII are used. Predicted failure cycles are compared with experimental failure cycle to quantify the conservatism of evaluation methods. All methods give very conservative failure cycles. The CC N-900 method is the most conservative and prediction results are only ∼0.5% of experimental data. For Sec. VIII method, the use of the option using code tensile properties gives ∼3% of experimental data, and the use of the material-specific reduction of area can reduce conservatism but still gives ∼15% of experimental data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ASME strain-based assessment method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Experimental validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finite element analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pipe elbow test under cyclic loading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear engineering. Atomic power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jae-Yoon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyun-Seok Song</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yun-Jae Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin-Weon Kim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear Engineering and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">55(2023), 5, Seite 1616-1629</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)63243855X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2566624-1</subfield><subfield code="x">17385733</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:55</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1616-1629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.01.027</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c8d64def07754141b8c05225cf327a04</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573323000694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1738-5733</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">55</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">1616-1629</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3989286

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Experimental validation of ASME strain-based seismic assessment methods using piping elbow test data

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?