A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture

IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability i...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Lukas Egli [verfasserIn] Judith Rüschhoff [verfasserIn] Jörg Priess [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems - Frontiers Media S.A., 2018, 7(2023)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:7 ; year:2023

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ090227379

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ090227379
003	DE-627
005	20230526113112.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230526s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ090227379
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TX341-641
050		0	\|a TP368-456
100	0		\|a Lukas Egli \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	2	\|a A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world.
650		4	\|a alternative food systems
650		4	\|a community-based farming
650		4	\|a food system transformation
650		4	\|a local food systems
650		4	\|a resilience
650		4	\|a solidarity
653		0	\|a Nutrition. Foods and food supply
653		0	\|a Food processing and manufacture
700	0		\|a Judith Rüschhoff \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Judith Rüschhoff \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jörg Priess \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems \|d Frontiers Media S.A., 2018 \|g 7(2023) \|w (DE-627)1019902493 \|w (DE-600)2928540-9 \|x 2571581X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:7 \|g year:2023
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 7 \|j 2023

Indexfelder

author_variant	l e le j r jr j r jr j p jp
matchkey_str	article:2571581X:2023----::sseairveoteclgcloilneooissanbltefcsfo
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
callnumber-subject-code	TX
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090227379 (DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TX341-641 TP368-456 Lukas Egli verfasserin aut A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world. alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity Nutrition. Foods and food supply Food processing and manufacture Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Jörg Priess verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Frontiers Media S.A., 2018 7(2023) (DE-627)1019902493 (DE-600)2928540-9 2571581X nnns volume:7 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2023
spelling	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090227379 (DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TX341-641 TP368-456 Lukas Egli verfasserin aut A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world. alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity Nutrition. Foods and food supply Food processing and manufacture Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Jörg Priess verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Frontiers Media S.A., 2018 7(2023) (DE-627)1019902493 (DE-600)2928540-9 2571581X nnns volume:7 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2023
allfields_unstemmed	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090227379 (DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TX341-641 TP368-456 Lukas Egli verfasserin aut A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world. alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity Nutrition. Foods and food supply Food processing and manufacture Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Jörg Priess verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Frontiers Media S.A., 2018 7(2023) (DE-627)1019902493 (DE-600)2928540-9 2571581X nnns volume:7 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2023
allfieldsGer	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090227379 (DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TX341-641 TP368-456 Lukas Egli verfasserin aut A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world. alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity Nutrition. Foods and food supply Food processing and manufacture Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Jörg Priess verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Frontiers Media S.A., 2018 7(2023) (DE-627)1019902493 (DE-600)2928540-9 2571581X nnns volume:7 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2023
allfieldsSound	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090227379 (DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TX341-641 TP368-456 Lukas Egli verfasserin aut A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world. alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity Nutrition. Foods and food supply Food processing and manufacture Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Judith Rüschhoff verfasserin aut Jörg Priess verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Frontiers Media S.A., 2018 7(2023) (DE-627)1019902493 (DE-600)2928540-9 2571581X nnns volume:7 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2023
language	English
source	In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7(2023) volume:7 year:2023
sourceStr	In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7(2023) volume:7 year:2023
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity Nutrition. Foods and food supply Food processing and manufacture
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Lukas Egli @@aut@@ Judith Rüschhoff @@aut@@ Jörg Priess @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1019902493
id	DOAJ090227379
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ090227379</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526113112.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230526s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ090227379</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TX341-641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lukas Egli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that &lt; 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alternative food systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">community-based farming</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">food system transformation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">local food systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">resilience</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">solidarity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nutrition. Foods and food supply</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Judith Rüschhoff</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Judith Rüschhoff</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jörg Priess</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2023)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1019902493</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2928540-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2571581X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Lukas Egli
spellingShingle	Lukas Egli misc TX341-641 misc TP368-456 misc alternative food systems misc community-based farming misc food system transformation misc local food systems misc resilience misc solidarity misc Nutrition. Foods and food supply misc Food processing and manufacture A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
authorStr	Lukas Egli
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1019902493
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TX341-641
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2571581X
topic_title	TX341-641 TP368-456 A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture alternative food systems community-based farming food system transformation local food systems resilience solidarity
topic	misc TX341-641 misc TP368-456 misc alternative food systems misc community-based farming misc food system transformation misc local food systems misc resilience misc solidarity misc Nutrition. Foods and food supply misc Food processing and manufacture
topic_unstemmed	misc TX341-641 misc TP368-456 misc alternative food systems misc community-based farming misc food system transformation misc local food systems misc resilience misc solidarity misc Nutrition. Foods and food supply misc Food processing and manufacture
topic_browse	misc TX341-641 misc TP368-456 misc alternative food systems misc community-based farming misc food system transformation misc local food systems misc resilience misc solidarity misc Nutrition. Foods and food supply misc Food processing and manufacture
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
hierarchy_parent_id	1019902493
hierarchy_top_title	Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1019902493 (DE-600)2928540-9
title	A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ090227379 (DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441
title_full	A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
author_sort	Lukas Egli
journal	Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
journalStr	Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Lukas Egli Judith Rüschhoff Jörg Priess
container_volume	7
class	TX341-641 TP368-456
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Lukas Egli
doi_str_mv	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
callnumber	TX341-641
title_auth	A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
abstract	IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world.
abstractGer	IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world.
abstract_unstemmed	IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that < 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture
url	https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866 https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X
remote_bool	true
author2	Judith Rüschhoff Jörg Priess
author2Str	Judith Rüschhoff Jörg Priess
ppnlink	1019902493
callnumber-subject	TX - Home Economics
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866
callnumber-a	TX341-641
up_date	2024-07-03T13:29:13.173Z
_version_	1803564721833508864
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ090227379</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526113112.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230526s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ090227379</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TX341-641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP368-456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lukas Egli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IntroductionCommunity-supported agriculture (CSA) offers a high potential to provide synergies between ecological, economic and social sustainability aspects. While CSA is still in a niche, it has experienced rapid growth and increasing interest during the last years. An overview of sustainability impacts of CSA based on quantitative empirical work is missing, which is needed for well-informed and targeted policies and funding, as well as to tackle research gaps.MethodsHere we reviewed the literature to systematically assess empirical and quantitative findings regarding sustainability outcomes of CSA at different levels.ResultsWe found that &lt; 30% of the 39 studies included assessed ecological sustainability aspects. If CSA farms were compared to reference systems, they mostly performed better with regard to resource use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of studies evaluated social aspects. While many studies showed that CSA yet fails to reach low-income households, and therefore members do not represent the average population, CSA membership improves health and sustainability behavior. Economic variables were assessed in more than half of the considered studies, but knowledge on the relative performance remains scarce. Nevertheless, first studies indicate high economic viability.DiscussionOur review suggests a largely positive performance of CSA with regard to sustainability. Accordingly, if CSA would reach a bigger share in the food system, it could contribute to a transformation toward sustainable food systems. To address important knowledge gaps, we recommend the consideration of more and particularly ecological sustainability aspects, comparisons across different farming and marketing systems and the integration of knowledge from different sources such as theses and practical knowledge documented in various languages in different parts of the world.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alternative food systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">community-based farming</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">food system transformation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">local food systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">resilience</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">solidarity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nutrition. Foods and food supply</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Food processing and manufacture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Judith Rüschhoff</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Judith Rüschhoff</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jörg Priess</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2023)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1019902493</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2928540-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2571581X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/844e4273bb414aacbd8278feac706441</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1136866/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2571-581X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3995876

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?