Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes
Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with h...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Shiva Azizinia [verfasserIn] Daniel Mullan [verfasserIn] Allan Rattey [verfasserIn] Jayfred Godoy [verfasserIn] Hannah Robinson [verfasserIn] David Moody [verfasserIn] Kerrie Forrest [verfasserIn] Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere [verfasserIn] Matthew J. Hayden [verfasserIn] Josquin FG. Tibbits [verfasserIn] Hans D. Daetwyler [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Frontiers in Plant Science - Frontiers Media S.A., 2011, 14(2023) |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2023 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ090590600 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ090590600 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230526112536.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230526s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ090590600 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a SB1-1110 | |
100 | 0 | |a Shiva Azizinia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. | ||
650 | 4 | |a genomic prediction | |
650 | 4 | |a multi-trait model | |
650 | 4 | |a wheat breeding | |
650 | 4 | |a genomic best linear unbiased prediction | |
650 | 4 | |a NIR-predictor | |
650 | 4 | |a forward-prediction | |
653 | 0 | |a Plant culture | |
700 | 0 | |a Daniel Mullan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Allan Rattey |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jayfred Godoy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hannah Robinson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a David Moody |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Kerrie Forrest |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Matthew J. Hayden |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Matthew J. Hayden |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Josquin FG. Tibbits |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hans D. Daetwyler |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hans D. Daetwyler |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Frontiers in Plant Science |d Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 |g 14(2023) |w (DE-627)662359240 |w (DE-600)2613694-6 |x 1664462X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2023 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2023 |
author_variant |
s a sa d m dm a r ar j g jg h r hr d m dm k f kf g k g gkg m j h mjh m j h mjh j f t jft h d d hdd h d d hdd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:1664462X:2023----::mrvduttatrdcinfhaedrdcqaiyrisynert |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
callnumber-subject-code |
SB |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090590600 (DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Shiva Azizinia verfasserin aut Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. genomic prediction multi-trait model wheat breeding genomic best linear unbiased prediction NIR-predictor forward-prediction Plant culture Daniel Mullan verfasserin aut Allan Rattey verfasserin aut Jayfred Godoy verfasserin aut Hannah Robinson verfasserin aut David Moody verfasserin aut Kerrie Forrest verfasserin aut Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Josquin FG. Tibbits verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Plant Science Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 14(2023) (DE-627)662359240 (DE-600)2613694-6 1664462X nnns volume:14 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2023 |
spelling |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090590600 (DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Shiva Azizinia verfasserin aut Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. genomic prediction multi-trait model wheat breeding genomic best linear unbiased prediction NIR-predictor forward-prediction Plant culture Daniel Mullan verfasserin aut Allan Rattey verfasserin aut Jayfred Godoy verfasserin aut Hannah Robinson verfasserin aut David Moody verfasserin aut Kerrie Forrest verfasserin aut Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Josquin FG. Tibbits verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Plant Science Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 14(2023) (DE-627)662359240 (DE-600)2613694-6 1664462X nnns volume:14 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2023 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090590600 (DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Shiva Azizinia verfasserin aut Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. genomic prediction multi-trait model wheat breeding genomic best linear unbiased prediction NIR-predictor forward-prediction Plant culture Daniel Mullan verfasserin aut Allan Rattey verfasserin aut Jayfred Godoy verfasserin aut Hannah Robinson verfasserin aut David Moody verfasserin aut Kerrie Forrest verfasserin aut Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Josquin FG. Tibbits verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Plant Science Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 14(2023) (DE-627)662359240 (DE-600)2613694-6 1664462X nnns volume:14 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2023 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090590600 (DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Shiva Azizinia verfasserin aut Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. genomic prediction multi-trait model wheat breeding genomic best linear unbiased prediction NIR-predictor forward-prediction Plant culture Daniel Mullan verfasserin aut Allan Rattey verfasserin aut Jayfred Godoy verfasserin aut Hannah Robinson verfasserin aut David Moody verfasserin aut Kerrie Forrest verfasserin aut Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Josquin FG. Tibbits verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Plant Science Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 14(2023) (DE-627)662359240 (DE-600)2613694-6 1664462X nnns volume:14 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2023 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090590600 (DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SB1-1110 Shiva Azizinia verfasserin aut Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. genomic prediction multi-trait model wheat breeding genomic best linear unbiased prediction NIR-predictor forward-prediction Plant culture Daniel Mullan verfasserin aut Allan Rattey verfasserin aut Jayfred Godoy verfasserin aut Hannah Robinson verfasserin aut David Moody verfasserin aut Kerrie Forrest verfasserin aut Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Matthew J. Hayden verfasserin aut Josquin FG. Tibbits verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut Hans D. Daetwyler verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Plant Science Frontiers Media S.A., 2011 14(2023) (DE-627)662359240 (DE-600)2613694-6 1664462X nnns volume:14 year:2023 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2023 |
language |
English |
source |
In Frontiers in Plant Science 14(2023) volume:14 year:2023 |
sourceStr |
In Frontiers in Plant Science 14(2023) volume:14 year:2023 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
genomic prediction multi-trait model wheat breeding genomic best linear unbiased prediction NIR-predictor forward-prediction Plant culture |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Shiva Azizinia @@aut@@ Daniel Mullan @@aut@@ Allan Rattey @@aut@@ Jayfred Godoy @@aut@@ Hannah Robinson @@aut@@ David Moody @@aut@@ Kerrie Forrest @@aut@@ Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere @@aut@@ Matthew J. Hayden @@aut@@ Josquin FG. Tibbits @@aut@@ Hans D. Daetwyler @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
662359240 |
id |
DOAJ090590600 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ090590600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112536.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230526s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ090590600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shiva Azizinia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genomic prediction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-trait model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wheat breeding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genomic best linear unbiased prediction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NIR-predictor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forward-prediction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniel Mullan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allan Rattey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jayfred Godoy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hannah Robinson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David Moody</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kerrie Forrest</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matthew J. Hayden</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matthew J. Hayden</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Josquin FG. Tibbits</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hans D. Daetwyler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hans D. Daetwyler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Plant Science</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2023)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)662359240</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2613694-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1664462X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
author |
Shiva Azizinia |
spellingShingle |
Shiva Azizinia misc SB1-1110 misc genomic prediction misc multi-trait model misc wheat breeding misc genomic best linear unbiased prediction misc NIR-predictor misc forward-prediction misc Plant culture Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes |
authorStr |
Shiva Azizinia |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)662359240 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
SB1-1110 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1664462X |
topic_title |
SB1-1110 Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes genomic prediction multi-trait model wheat breeding genomic best linear unbiased prediction NIR-predictor forward-prediction |
topic |
misc SB1-1110 misc genomic prediction misc multi-trait model misc wheat breeding misc genomic best linear unbiased prediction misc NIR-predictor misc forward-prediction misc Plant culture |
topic_unstemmed |
misc SB1-1110 misc genomic prediction misc multi-trait model misc wheat breeding misc genomic best linear unbiased prediction misc NIR-predictor misc forward-prediction misc Plant culture |
topic_browse |
misc SB1-1110 misc genomic prediction misc multi-trait model misc wheat breeding misc genomic best linear unbiased prediction misc NIR-predictor misc forward-prediction misc Plant culture |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
hierarchy_parent_id |
662359240 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)662359240 (DE-600)2613694-6 |
title |
Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ090590600 (DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 |
title_full |
Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes |
author_sort |
Shiva Azizinia |
journal |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
journalStr |
Frontiers in Plant Science |
callnumber-first-code |
S |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Shiva Azizinia Daniel Mullan Allan Rattey Jayfred Godoy Hannah Robinson David Moody Kerrie Forrest Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere Matthew J. Hayden Josquin FG. Tibbits Hans D. Daetwyler |
container_volume |
14 |
class |
SB1-1110 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Shiva Azizinia |
doi_str_mv |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating nir-predicted phenotypes |
callnumber |
SB1-1110 |
title_auth |
Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes |
abstract |
Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. |
abstractGer |
Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Daniel Mullan Allan Rattey Jayfred Godoy Hannah Robinson David Moody Kerrie Forrest Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere Matthew J. Hayden Josquin FG. Tibbits Hans D. Daetwyler |
author2Str |
Daniel Mullan Allan Rattey Jayfred Godoy Hannah Robinson David Moody Kerrie Forrest Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere Matthew J. Hayden Josquin FG. Tibbits Hans D. Daetwyler |
ppnlink |
662359240 |
callnumber-subject |
SB - Plant Culture |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221 |
callnumber-a |
SB1-1110 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:39:47.939Z |
_version_ |
1803572937167470592 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ090590600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112536.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230526s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ090590600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SB1-1110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shiva Azizinia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400–1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012–2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5–0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69–0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genomic prediction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-trait model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wheat breeding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genomic best linear unbiased prediction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NIR-predictor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forward-prediction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plant culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniel Mullan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allan Rattey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jayfred Godoy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hannah Robinson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David Moody</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kerrie Forrest</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matthew J. Hayden</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matthew J. Hayden</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Josquin FG. Tibbits</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hans D. Daetwyler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hans D. Daetwyler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Plant Science</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2023)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)662359240</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2613694-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1664462X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0d48e16aa0d04cc0a5d7b61769c9ad48</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167221/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1664-462X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400324 |