Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospita...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Moeez Fatima [verfasserIn] Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: JLUMHS - Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011, 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:21 ; year:2022 ; number:04 ; pages:258-263 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ090603931 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ090603931 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230526112703.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230526s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ090603931 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Moeez Fatima |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. | ||
650 | 4 | |a soft tissue defect | |
650 | 4 | |a upper extremity defects | |
650 | 4 | |a soft tissue coverage | |
650 | 4 | |a flaps for upper limb | |
650 | 4 | |a upper extremity reconstruction | |
650 | 4 | |a upper limb trauma. | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
700 | 0 | |a Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t JLUMHS |d Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011 |g 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 |w (DE-627)1760616680 |x 23098627 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2022 |g number:04 |g pages:258-263 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 21 |j 2022 |e 04 |h 258-263 |
author_variant |
m f mf f a a k faak |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:23098627:2022----::eosrcinfotiseeetou |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090603931 (DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Moeez Fatima verfasserin aut Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. soft tissue defect upper extremity defects soft tissue coverage flaps for upper limb upper extremity reconstruction upper limb trauma. Medicine R Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan verfasserin aut In JLUMHS Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 (DE-627)1760616680 23098627 nnns volume:21 year:2022 number:04 pages:258-263 https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b kostenfrei https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 21 2022 04 258-263 |
spelling |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090603931 (DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Moeez Fatima verfasserin aut Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. soft tissue defect upper extremity defects soft tissue coverage flaps for upper limb upper extremity reconstruction upper limb trauma. Medicine R Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan verfasserin aut In JLUMHS Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 (DE-627)1760616680 23098627 nnns volume:21 year:2022 number:04 pages:258-263 https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b kostenfrei https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 21 2022 04 258-263 |
allfields_unstemmed |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090603931 (DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Moeez Fatima verfasserin aut Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. soft tissue defect upper extremity defects soft tissue coverage flaps for upper limb upper extremity reconstruction upper limb trauma. Medicine R Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan verfasserin aut In JLUMHS Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 (DE-627)1760616680 23098627 nnns volume:21 year:2022 number:04 pages:258-263 https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b kostenfrei https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 21 2022 04 258-263 |
allfieldsGer |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090603931 (DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Moeez Fatima verfasserin aut Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. soft tissue defect upper extremity defects soft tissue coverage flaps for upper limb upper extremity reconstruction upper limb trauma. Medicine R Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan verfasserin aut In JLUMHS Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 (DE-627)1760616680 23098627 nnns volume:21 year:2022 number:04 pages:258-263 https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b kostenfrei https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 21 2022 04 258-263 |
allfieldsSound |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 doi (DE-627)DOAJ090603931 (DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Moeez Fatima verfasserin aut Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. soft tissue defect upper extremity defects soft tissue coverage flaps for upper limb upper extremity reconstruction upper limb trauma. Medicine R Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan verfasserin aut In JLUMHS Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 (DE-627)1760616680 23098627 nnns volume:21 year:2022 number:04 pages:258-263 https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b kostenfrei https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 21 2022 04 258-263 |
language |
English |
source |
In JLUMHS 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 volume:21 year:2022 number:04 pages:258-263 |
sourceStr |
In JLUMHS 21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263 volume:21 year:2022 number:04 pages:258-263 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
soft tissue defect upper extremity defects soft tissue coverage flaps for upper limb upper extremity reconstruction upper limb trauma. Medicine R |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
JLUMHS |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Moeez Fatima @@aut@@ Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760616680 |
id |
DOAJ090603931 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ090603931</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112703.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230526s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ090603931</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moeez Fatima</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">soft tissue defect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upper extremity defects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">soft tissue coverage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flaps for upper limb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upper extremity reconstruction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upper limb trauma.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">JLUMHS</subfield><subfield code="d">Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760616680</subfield><subfield code="x">23098627</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:258-263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">04</subfield><subfield code="h">258-263</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Moeez Fatima |
spellingShingle |
Moeez Fatima misc soft tissue defect misc upper extremity defects misc soft tissue coverage misc flaps for upper limb misc upper extremity reconstruction misc upper limb trauma. misc Medicine misc R Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity |
authorStr |
Moeez Fatima |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760616680 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
23098627 |
topic_title |
Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity soft tissue defect upper extremity defects soft tissue coverage flaps for upper limb upper extremity reconstruction upper limb trauma |
topic |
misc soft tissue defect misc upper extremity defects misc soft tissue coverage misc flaps for upper limb misc upper extremity reconstruction misc upper limb trauma. misc Medicine misc R |
topic_unstemmed |
misc soft tissue defect misc upper extremity defects misc soft tissue coverage misc flaps for upper limb misc upper extremity reconstruction misc upper limb trauma. misc Medicine misc R |
topic_browse |
misc soft tissue defect misc upper extremity defects misc soft tissue coverage misc flaps for upper limb misc upper extremity reconstruction misc upper limb trauma. misc Medicine misc R |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
JLUMHS |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760616680 |
hierarchy_top_title |
JLUMHS |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760616680 |
title |
Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ090603931 (DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b |
title_full |
Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity |
author_sort |
Moeez Fatima |
journal |
JLUMHS |
journalStr |
JLUMHS |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
258 |
author_browse |
Moeez Fatima Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan |
container_volume |
21 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Moeez Fatima |
doi_str_mv |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
reconstruction of soft tissue defects of upper extremity |
title_auth |
Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity |
abstract |
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. |
abstractGer |
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. |
abstract_unstemmed |
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 |
container_issue |
04 |
title_short |
Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity |
url |
https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341 https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan |
author2Str |
Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan |
ppnlink |
1760616680 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:44:25.201Z |
_version_ |
1803573227896700928 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ090603931</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230526112703.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230526s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ090603931</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moeez Fatima</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects of Upper Extremity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the etiology of upper extremity soft tissue defects and determine the outcome of the various methods for covering upper limb soft tissue defects. METHODOLOGY: This case series study was done at the Plastic and reconstructive Surgery department Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 2018 to May 2019. Seventy-six cases were operated on in the department of plastic surgery. All patients with upper extremity defects with or without exposed bone, open fractures, and early presentation were included. Segmental bone defects, dirty wounds and patient’s denial of consent were excluded. The mechanism of injury, association with fractures and the method of fixation was documented. Radiographic images were taken. Further, the functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed. Performa data has been analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient was 33±10.87 years. Road traffic accidents 32.89% and machine cut injuries 31.58% were the commonest etiologies of upper limb defects. Postburn contracture was seen in 10.53%, secondary to debridement at 13.16%, secondary to fasciotomy at 3.95%, secondary to flap harvest at 6.58%, and secondary to tumor resection at 1.32%. 33(43.42%) upper limb defects were treated by grafting, and flaps were used in 43(56.58%). CONCLUSION: Road traffic accidents and machine cut injuries are the main etiological factors of upper extremity defects. Grafting and flaps are used in the management of soft tissue defects. They have relatively low complication rates, provided that all measures should be taken to eliminate soft tissue or bone infection.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">soft tissue defect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upper extremity defects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">soft tissue coverage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">flaps for upper limb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upper extremity reconstruction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">upper limb trauma.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Faisal Akhlaq Ali Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">JLUMHS</subfield><subfield code="d">Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2022), 04, Seite 258-263</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760616680</subfield><subfield code="x">23098627</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:258-263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/doi:10.22442/jlumhs.2022.00942</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9fdb36527d1049018dee1ca59b7b509b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.lumhs.edu.pk/jlumhs/Vol21No04/05.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1729-0341</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2309-8627</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">04</subfield><subfield code="h">258-263</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401634 |