Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures

Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Giorgio Ficco [verfasserIn] Marco Dell’Isola [verfasserIn] Giorgio Graditi [verfasserIn] Giulia Monteleone [verfasserIn] Paola Gislon [verfasserIn] Pawel Kulaga [verfasserIn] Jacek Jaworski [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2024

Schlagwörter:	smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Sensors - MDPI AG, 2003, 24(2024), 5, p 1455
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:24 ; year:2024 ; number:5, p 1455

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/s24051455

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ091235545

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ091235545
003	DE-627
005	20240413232330.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240412s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/s24051455 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ091235545
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TP1-1185
100	0		\|a Giorgio Ficco \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures
264		1	\|c 2024
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).
650		4	\|a smart meter
650		4	\|a in-field verification
650		4	\|a ultrasonic
650		4	\|a thermal mass
650		4	\|a diaphragm
650		4	\|a hydrogen blending
653		0	\|a Chemical technology
700	0		\|a Marco Dell’Isola \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Giorgio Graditi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Giulia Monteleone \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Paola Gislon \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Pawel Kulaga \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jacek Jaworski \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Sensors \|d MDPI AG, 2003 \|g 24(2024), 5, p 1455 \|w (DE-627)331640910 \|w (DE-600)2052857-7 \|x 14248220 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:24 \|g year:2024 \|g number:5, p 1455
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 24 \|j 2024 \|e 5, p 1455

Indexfelder

author_variant	g f gf m d md g g gg g m gm p g pg p k pk j j jj
matchkey_str	article:14248220:2024----::eibltodmsigslwesrwthd
hierarchy_sort_str	2024
callnumber-subject-code	TP
publishDate	2024
allfields	10.3390/s24051455 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091235545 (DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP1-1185 Giorgio Ficco verfasserin aut Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen). smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending Chemical technology Marco Dell’Isola verfasserin aut Giorgio Graditi verfasserin aut Giulia Monteleone verfasserin aut Paola Gislon verfasserin aut Pawel Kulaga verfasserin aut Jacek Jaworski verfasserin aut In Sensors MDPI AG, 2003 24(2024), 5, p 1455 (DE-627)331640910 (DE-600)2052857-7 14248220 nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:5, p 1455 https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 24 2024 5, p 1455
spelling	10.3390/s24051455 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091235545 (DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP1-1185 Giorgio Ficco verfasserin aut Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen). smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending Chemical technology Marco Dell’Isola verfasserin aut Giorgio Graditi verfasserin aut Giulia Monteleone verfasserin aut Paola Gislon verfasserin aut Pawel Kulaga verfasserin aut Jacek Jaworski verfasserin aut In Sensors MDPI AG, 2003 24(2024), 5, p 1455 (DE-627)331640910 (DE-600)2052857-7 14248220 nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:5, p 1455 https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 24 2024 5, p 1455
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/s24051455 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091235545 (DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP1-1185 Giorgio Ficco verfasserin aut Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen). smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending Chemical technology Marco Dell’Isola verfasserin aut Giorgio Graditi verfasserin aut Giulia Monteleone verfasserin aut Paola Gislon verfasserin aut Pawel Kulaga verfasserin aut Jacek Jaworski verfasserin aut In Sensors MDPI AG, 2003 24(2024), 5, p 1455 (DE-627)331640910 (DE-600)2052857-7 14248220 nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:5, p 1455 https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 24 2024 5, p 1455
allfieldsGer	10.3390/s24051455 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091235545 (DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP1-1185 Giorgio Ficco verfasserin aut Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen). smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending Chemical technology Marco Dell’Isola verfasserin aut Giorgio Graditi verfasserin aut Giulia Monteleone verfasserin aut Paola Gislon verfasserin aut Pawel Kulaga verfasserin aut Jacek Jaworski verfasserin aut In Sensors MDPI AG, 2003 24(2024), 5, p 1455 (DE-627)331640910 (DE-600)2052857-7 14248220 nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:5, p 1455 https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 24 2024 5, p 1455
allfieldsSound	10.3390/s24051455 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091235545 (DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TP1-1185 Giorgio Ficco verfasserin aut Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen). smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending Chemical technology Marco Dell’Isola verfasserin aut Giorgio Graditi verfasserin aut Giulia Monteleone verfasserin aut Paola Gislon verfasserin aut Pawel Kulaga verfasserin aut Jacek Jaworski verfasserin aut In Sensors MDPI AG, 2003 24(2024), 5, p 1455 (DE-627)331640910 (DE-600)2052857-7 14248220 nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:5, p 1455 https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 24 2024 5, p 1455
language	English
source	In Sensors 24(2024), 5, p 1455 volume:24 year:2024 number:5, p 1455
sourceStr	In Sensors 24(2024), 5, p 1455 volume:24 year:2024 number:5, p 1455
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending Chemical technology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Sensors
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Giorgio Ficco @@aut@@ Marco Dell’Isola @@aut@@ Giorgio Graditi @@aut@@ Giulia Monteleone @@aut@@ Paola Gislon @@aut@@ Pawel Kulaga @@aut@@ Jacek Jaworski @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	331640910
id	DOAJ091235545
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ091235545</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413232330.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240412s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/s24051455</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ091235545</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP1-1185</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giorgio Ficco</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">smart meter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">in-field verification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ultrasonic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">thermal mass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diaphragm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hydrogen blending</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Chemical technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marco Dell’Isola</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giorgio Graditi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giulia Monteleone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paola Gislon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pawel Kulaga</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jacek Jaworski</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sensors</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2024), 5, p 1455</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331640910</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2052857-7</subfield><subfield code="x">14248220</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 1455</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 1455</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Giorgio Ficco
spellingShingle	Giorgio Ficco misc TP1-1185 misc smart meter misc in-field verification misc ultrasonic misc thermal mass misc diaphragm misc hydrogen blending misc Chemical technology Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures
authorStr	Giorgio Ficco
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)331640910
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TP1-1185
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	14248220
topic_title	TP1-1185 Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures smart meter in-field verification ultrasonic thermal mass diaphragm hydrogen blending
topic	misc TP1-1185 misc smart meter misc in-field verification misc ultrasonic misc thermal mass misc diaphragm misc hydrogen blending misc Chemical technology
topic_unstemmed	misc TP1-1185 misc smart meter misc in-field verification misc ultrasonic misc thermal mass misc diaphragm misc hydrogen blending misc Chemical technology
topic_browse	misc TP1-1185 misc smart meter misc in-field verification misc ultrasonic misc thermal mass misc diaphragm misc hydrogen blending misc Chemical technology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Sensors
hierarchy_parent_id	331640910
hierarchy_top_title	Sensors
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)331640910 (DE-600)2052857-7
title	Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ091235545 (DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915
title_full	Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures
author_sort	Giorgio Ficco
journal	Sensors
journalStr	Sensors
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2024
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Giorgio Ficco Marco Dell’Isola Giorgio Graditi Giulia Monteleone Paola Gislon Pawel Kulaga Jacek Jaworski
container_volume	24
class	TP1-1185
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Giorgio Ficco
doi_str_mv	10.3390/s24051455
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	reliability of domestic gas flow sensors with hydrogen admixtures
callnumber	TP1-1185
title_auth	Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures
abstract	Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).
abstractGer	Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).
abstract_unstemmed	Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5, p 1455
title_short	Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455 https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915 https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455 https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220
remote_bool	true
author2	Marco Dell’Isola Giorgio Graditi Giulia Monteleone Paola Gislon Pawel Kulaga Jacek Jaworski
author2Str	Marco Dell’Isola Giorgio Graditi Giulia Monteleone Paola Gislon Pawel Kulaga Jacek Jaworski
ppnlink	331640910
callnumber-subject	TP - Chemical Technology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/s24051455
callnumber-a	TP1-1185
up_date	2024-07-03T19:16:11.786Z
_version_	1803586551717822464
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ091235545</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413232330.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240412s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/s24051455</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ091235545</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP1-1185</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giorgio Ficco</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Static flow sensors (e.g., thermal gas micro electro-mechanical sensors—MEMS—and ultrasonic time of flight) are becoming the prevailing technology for domestic gas metering and billing since they show advantages in respect to the traditional volumetric ones. However, they are expected to be influenced in-service by changes in gas composition, which in the future could be more frequent due to the spread of hydrogen admixtures in gas networks. In this paper, the authors present the results of an experimental campaign aimed at analyzing the in-service reliability of both static and volumetric gas meters with different hydrogen admixtures. The results show that the accuracy of volumetric and ultrasonic meters is always within the admitted limits for subsequent verification and even within those narrower of the initial verification. On the other hand, the accuracy of the first generation of thermal mass gas flow sensors is within the limits of the verification only when the hydrogen admixture is below 2%vol. At higher hydrogen content, in fact, the absolute weighted mean error ranges between 3.5% (with 5%vol of hydrogen) and 15.8% (with 10%vol of hydrogen).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">smart meter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">in-field verification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ultrasonic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">thermal mass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diaphragm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hydrogen blending</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Chemical technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marco Dell’Isola</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giorgio Graditi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Giulia Monteleone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paola Gislon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pawel Kulaga</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jacek Jaworski</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sensors</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2024), 5, p 1455</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331640910</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2052857-7</subfield><subfield code="x">14248220</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 1455</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051455</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ce33ec3152b54f83af1b921e8476b915</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/5/1455</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 1455</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401309

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Reliability of Domestic Gas Flow Sensors with Hydrogen Admixtures

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?