Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To scr...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Chinesisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Zhongguo quanke yixue - Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024, 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:2023 ; number:09 ; pages:1151-1158 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ091497361 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ091497361 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240412093953.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240412s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ091497361 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a chi | ||
100 | 0 | |a WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. | ||
650 | 4 | |a osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Zhongguo quanke yixue |d Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024 |g 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 |w (DE-627)DOAJ090664779 |x 10079572 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2023 |g number:09 |g pages:1151-1158 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 26 |j 2023 |e 09 |h 1151-1158 |
author_variant |
x s r w j x n w xsrwjxn xsrwjxnw |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:10079572:2023----::etvdneumroeecsitretosootoooi |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091497361 (DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying verfasserin aut Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence Medicine R In Zhongguo quanke yixue Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 (DE-627)DOAJ090664779 10079572 nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:09 pages:1151-1158 https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e kostenfrei https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 26 2023 09 1151-1158 |
spelling |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091497361 (DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying verfasserin aut Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence Medicine R In Zhongguo quanke yixue Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 (DE-627)DOAJ090664779 10079572 nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:09 pages:1151-1158 https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e kostenfrei https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 26 2023 09 1151-1158 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091497361 (DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying verfasserin aut Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence Medicine R In Zhongguo quanke yixue Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 (DE-627)DOAJ090664779 10079572 nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:09 pages:1151-1158 https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e kostenfrei https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 26 2023 09 1151-1158 |
allfieldsGer |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091497361 (DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying verfasserin aut Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence Medicine R In Zhongguo quanke yixue Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 (DE-627)DOAJ090664779 10079572 nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:09 pages:1151-1158 https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e kostenfrei https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 26 2023 09 1151-1158 |
allfieldsSound |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 doi (DE-627)DOAJ091497361 (DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb chi WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying verfasserin aut Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence Medicine R In Zhongguo quanke yixue Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 (DE-627)DOAJ090664779 10079572 nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:09 pages:1151-1158 https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e kostenfrei https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 26 2023 09 1151-1158 |
language |
Chinese |
source |
In Zhongguo quanke yixue 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 volume:26 year:2023 number:09 pages:1151-1158 |
sourceStr |
In Zhongguo quanke yixue 26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158 volume:26 year:2023 number:09 pages:1151-1158 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence Medicine R |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Zhongguo quanke yixue |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ090664779 |
id |
DOAJ091497361 |
language_de |
chinesisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ091497361</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412093953.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240412s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ091497361</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">chi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Zhongguo quanke yixue</subfield><subfield code="d">Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090664779</subfield><subfield code="x">10079572</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1151-1158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">09</subfield><subfield code="h">1151-1158</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying |
spellingShingle |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying misc osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence misc Medicine misc R Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women |
authorStr |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ090664779 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
10079572 |
topic_title |
Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence |
topic |
misc osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence misc Medicine misc R |
topic_unstemmed |
misc osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence misc Medicine misc R |
topic_browse |
misc osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence misc Medicine misc R |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Zhongguo quanke yixue |
hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ090664779 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Zhongguo quanke yixue |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ090664779 |
title |
Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ091497361 (DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e |
title_full |
Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women |
author_sort |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying |
journal |
Zhongguo quanke yixue |
journalStr |
Zhongguo quanke yixue |
lang_code |
chi |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1151 |
author_browse |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying |
container_volume |
26 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying |
doi_str_mv |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 |
title_sort |
best evidence summary of exercise interventions for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women |
title_auth |
Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women |
abstract |
Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. |
abstractGer |
Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
09 |
title_short |
Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women |
url |
https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
DOAJ090664779 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T20:43:18.154Z |
_version_ |
1803592031962923008 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ091497361</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412093953.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240412s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ091497361</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">chi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Exercise is one of inexpensive and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but relevant pieces of evidence are wide-ranging and fragmented, and there is no standardized and comprehensive exercise guidance program on clinic. Objective To screen and assess the evidence of exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis, then summarize the best pieces. Methods We systematically searched clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, evidence summaries, expert consensuses and systematic reviews regarding exercise interventions for postmenopausal osteoporosis in databases of BMJ Best Practice, Up To Date, DynaMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, webs of Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, International Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Osteoporosis Society, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, Medlive, JBI, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and SinoMed from inception to January 2022. All relevant evidence was summarized and extracted according to the theme. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREEⅡ) was used to evaluate the quality of the guidelines, Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence (CASE) was used to evaluate the quality of clinical decisions, the authenticity assessment tool of the expert consensus of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center in Australia (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of expert consensuses, the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Centre System Evaluation Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool (2016 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of the systematic reviews. Results A total of 18 studies were included, including seven guidelines, two clinical decisions, four expert consensuses and five systematic reviews. Twenty-two pieces of evidence were extracted, involving five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. Conclusion This paper extracts the best evidence of exercise intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients from five aspects: pre-exercise assessment, exercise type, exercise intensity and time, health education and precautions. To reduce the risks of falls and fractures and improve quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, it is suggested to provide these women with rational exercise guidance developed based on the best evidence.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">osteoporosis, postmenopausal|exercise therapy|evidence-based medicine|clinical decision-making|guidebook|systematic reviews|evidence summary|best evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Zhongguo quanke yixue</subfield><subfield code="d">Chinese General Practice Publishing House Co., Ltd, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2023), 09, Seite 1151-1158</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090664779</subfield><subfield code="x">10079572</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1151-1158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0676</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/725540ac60f9457baf5913ebfdc3178e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.chinagp.net/fileup/1007-9572/PDF/zx20220676.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1007-9572</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">09</subfield><subfield code="h">1151-1158</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399727 |