Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center

BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomograp...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Miao Huang [verfasserIn] Bing Liu [verfasserIn] Xiang Li [verfasserIn] Nan Li [verfasserIn] Xin Yang [verfasserIn] Yaqi Wang [verfasserIn] Shanyuan Zhang [verfasserIn] Fangliang Lu [verfasserIn] Shaolei Li [verfasserIn] Shi Yan [verfasserIn] Nan Wu [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2024

Schlagwörter:	adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Frontiers in Oncology - Frontiers Media S.A., 2012, 14(2024)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:14 ; year:2024

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ09229622X

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ09229622X
003	DE-627
005	20240412121123.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240412s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ09229622X
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC254-282
100	0		\|a Miao Huang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center
264		1	\|c 2024
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.
650		4	\|a adjuvant chemotherapy
650		4	\|a lung adenocarcinoma
650		4	\|a maximum standardized uptake value
650		4	\|a standardized uptake value
650		4	\|a overall survival
653		0	\|a Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
700	0		\|a Bing Liu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xiang Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Nan Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xin Yang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yaqi Wang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Shanyuan Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Fangliang Lu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Shaolei Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Shi Yan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Nan Wu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Nan Wu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Frontiers in Oncology \|d Frontiers Media S.A., 2012 \|g 14(2024) \|w (DE-627)684965518 \|w (DE-600)2649216-7 \|x 2234943X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:14 \|g year:2024
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 14 \|j 2024

Indexfelder

author_variant	m h mh b l bl x l xl n l nl x y xy y w yw s z sz f l fl s l sl s y sy n w nw n w nw
matchkey_str	article:2234943X:2024----::eeiilmlctosfduathmteayosaebugdncrioaxiiiglvtdumxndpt
hierarchy_sort_str	2024
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2024
allfields	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 doi (DE-627)DOAJ09229622X (DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 Miao Huang verfasserin aut Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT. adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Bing Liu verfasserin aut Xiang Li verfasserin aut Nan Li verfasserin aut Xin Yang verfasserin aut Yaqi Wang verfasserin aut Shanyuan Zhang verfasserin aut Fangliang Lu verfasserin aut Shaolei Li verfasserin aut Shi Yan verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Oncology Frontiers Media S.A., 2012 14(2024) (DE-627)684965518 (DE-600)2649216-7 2234943X nnns volume:14 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2024
spelling	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 doi (DE-627)DOAJ09229622X (DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 Miao Huang verfasserin aut Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT. adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Bing Liu verfasserin aut Xiang Li verfasserin aut Nan Li verfasserin aut Xin Yang verfasserin aut Yaqi Wang verfasserin aut Shanyuan Zhang verfasserin aut Fangliang Lu verfasserin aut Shaolei Li verfasserin aut Shi Yan verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Oncology Frontiers Media S.A., 2012 14(2024) (DE-627)684965518 (DE-600)2649216-7 2234943X nnns volume:14 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2024
allfields_unstemmed	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 doi (DE-627)DOAJ09229622X (DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 Miao Huang verfasserin aut Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT. adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Bing Liu verfasserin aut Xiang Li verfasserin aut Nan Li verfasserin aut Xin Yang verfasserin aut Yaqi Wang verfasserin aut Shanyuan Zhang verfasserin aut Fangliang Lu verfasserin aut Shaolei Li verfasserin aut Shi Yan verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Oncology Frontiers Media S.A., 2012 14(2024) (DE-627)684965518 (DE-600)2649216-7 2234943X nnns volume:14 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2024
allfieldsGer	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 doi (DE-627)DOAJ09229622X (DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 Miao Huang verfasserin aut Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT. adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Bing Liu verfasserin aut Xiang Li verfasserin aut Nan Li verfasserin aut Xin Yang verfasserin aut Yaqi Wang verfasserin aut Shanyuan Zhang verfasserin aut Fangliang Lu verfasserin aut Shaolei Li verfasserin aut Shi Yan verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Oncology Frontiers Media S.A., 2012 14(2024) (DE-627)684965518 (DE-600)2649216-7 2234943X nnns volume:14 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2024
allfieldsSound	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 doi (DE-627)DOAJ09229622X (DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 Miao Huang verfasserin aut Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT. adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Bing Liu verfasserin aut Xiang Li verfasserin aut Nan Li verfasserin aut Xin Yang verfasserin aut Yaqi Wang verfasserin aut Shanyuan Zhang verfasserin aut Fangliang Lu verfasserin aut Shaolei Li verfasserin aut Shi Yan verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut Nan Wu verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Oncology Frontiers Media S.A., 2012 14(2024) (DE-627)684965518 (DE-600)2649216-7 2234943X nnns volume:14 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2024
language	English
source	In Frontiers in Oncology 14(2024) volume:14 year:2024
sourceStr	In Frontiers in Oncology 14(2024) volume:14 year:2024
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Frontiers in Oncology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Miao Huang @@aut@@ Bing Liu @@aut@@ Xiang Li @@aut@@ Nan Li @@aut@@ Xin Yang @@aut@@ Yaqi Wang @@aut@@ Shanyuan Zhang @@aut@@ Fangliang Lu @@aut@@ Shaolei Li @@aut@@ Shi Yan @@aut@@ Nan Wu @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	684965518
id	DOAJ09229622X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ09229622X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412121123.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240412s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ09229622X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC254-282</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miao Huang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p &lt; 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax &lt; 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">adjuvant chemotherapy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lung adenocarcinoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">maximum standardized uptake value</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">standardized uptake value</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">overall survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bing Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiang Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nan Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xin Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yaqi Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shanyuan Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fangliang Lu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shaolei Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi Yan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nan Wu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nan Wu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Oncology</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2024)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)684965518</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2649216-7</subfield><subfield code="x">2234943X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Miao Huang
spellingShingle	Miao Huang misc RC254-282 misc adjuvant chemotherapy misc lung adenocarcinoma misc maximum standardized uptake value misc standardized uptake value misc overall survival misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center
authorStr	Miao Huang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)684965518
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC254-282
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2234943X
topic_title	RC254-282 Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center adjuvant chemotherapy lung adenocarcinoma maximum standardized uptake value standardized uptake value overall survival
topic	misc RC254-282 misc adjuvant chemotherapy misc lung adenocarcinoma misc maximum standardized uptake value misc standardized uptake value misc overall survival misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
topic_unstemmed	misc RC254-282 misc adjuvant chemotherapy misc lung adenocarcinoma misc maximum standardized uptake value misc standardized uptake value misc overall survival misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
topic_browse	misc RC254-282 misc adjuvant chemotherapy misc lung adenocarcinoma misc maximum standardized uptake value misc standardized uptake value misc overall survival misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Frontiers in Oncology
hierarchy_parent_id	684965518
hierarchy_top_title	Frontiers in Oncology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)684965518 (DE-600)2649216-7
title	Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ09229622X (DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481
title_full	Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center
author_sort	Miao Huang
journal	Frontiers in Oncology
journalStr	Frontiers in Oncology
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2024
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Miao Huang Bing Liu Xiang Li Nan Li Xin Yang Yaqi Wang Shanyuan Zhang Fangliang Lu Shaolei Li Shi Yan Nan Wu
container_volume	14
class	RC254-282
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Miao Huang
doi_str_mv	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage ib lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated suvmax in fdg-pet/ct: a retrospective study from a single center
callnumber	RC254-282
title_auth	Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center
abstract	BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.
abstractGer	BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.
abstract_unstemmed	BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center
url	https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200 https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X
remote_bool	true
author2	Bing Liu Xiang Li Nan Li Xin Yang Yaqi Wang Shanyuan Zhang Fangliang Lu Shaolei Li Shi Yan Nan Wu
author2Str	Bing Liu Xiang Li Nan Li Xin Yang Yaqi Wang Shanyuan Zhang Fangliang Lu Shaolei Li Shi Yan Nan Wu
ppnlink	684965518
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200
callnumber-a	RC254-282
up_date	2024-07-04T00:50:27.110Z
_version_	1803607581248192512
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ09229622X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412121123.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240412s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ09229622X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC254-282</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miao Huang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BackgroundControversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.MethodsWe scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.ResultsBased on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p &lt; 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax &lt; 5.0.ConclusionThe preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">adjuvant chemotherapy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lung adenocarcinoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">maximum standardized uptake value</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">standardized uptake value</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">overall survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bing Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiang Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nan Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xin Yang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yaqi Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shanyuan Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fangliang Lu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shaolei Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi Yan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nan Wu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nan Wu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Oncology</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2024)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)684965518</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2649216-7</subfield><subfield code="x">2234943X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d3d18ddd2c924a83b15361b317f72481</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1367200/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400069

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?