Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty

The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Theodoros B. Grivas [verfasserIn] Elias Vasiliadis [verfasserIn] George Vynichakis [verfasserIn] Michail Chandrinos [verfasserIn] Konstantinos Athanasopoulos [verfasserIn] Paschalis Christodoulides [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Children - MDPI AG, 2014, 10(2023), 1697, p 1697
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:10 ; year:2023 ; number:1697, p 1697

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/children10101697

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ093158637

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ093158637
003	DE-627
005	20240413220240.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240413s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/children10101697 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ093158637
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RJ1-570
100	0		\|a Theodoros B. Grivas \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity.
650		4	\|a idiopathic scoliosis
650		4	\|a rib hump
650		4	\|a rib cage deformity
650		4	\|a aetiology
650		4	\|a rib index
650		4	\|a segmental rib index
653		0	\|a Pediatrics
700	0		\|a Elias Vasiliadis \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a George Vynichakis \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Michail Chandrinos \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Konstantinos Athanasopoulos \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Paschalis Christodoulides \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Children \|d MDPI AG, 2014 \|g 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 \|w (DE-627)768093007 \|w (DE-600)2732685-8 \|x 22279067 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:10 \|g year:2023 \|g number:1697, p 1697
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 10 \|j 2023 \|e 1697, p 1697

Indexfelder

author_variant	t b g tbg e v ev g v gv m c mc k a ka p c pc
matchkey_str	article:22279067:2023----::hiteelasrmatihmdfriyfesiaoeainiiiptisoisseilgclmlctosnrcg
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
callnumber-subject-code	RJ
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.3390/children10101697 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093158637 (DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RJ1-570 Theodoros B. Grivas verfasserin aut Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity. idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index Pediatrics Elias Vasiliadis verfasserin aut George Vynichakis verfasserin aut Michail Chandrinos verfasserin aut Konstantinos Athanasopoulos verfasserin aut Paschalis Christodoulides verfasserin aut In Children MDPI AG, 2014 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 (DE-627)768093007 (DE-600)2732685-8 22279067 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1697, p 1697 https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1697, p 1697
spelling	10.3390/children10101697 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093158637 (DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RJ1-570 Theodoros B. Grivas verfasserin aut Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity. idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index Pediatrics Elias Vasiliadis verfasserin aut George Vynichakis verfasserin aut Michail Chandrinos verfasserin aut Konstantinos Athanasopoulos verfasserin aut Paschalis Christodoulides verfasserin aut In Children MDPI AG, 2014 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 (DE-627)768093007 (DE-600)2732685-8 22279067 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1697, p 1697 https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1697, p 1697
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/children10101697 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093158637 (DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RJ1-570 Theodoros B. Grivas verfasserin aut Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity. idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index Pediatrics Elias Vasiliadis verfasserin aut George Vynichakis verfasserin aut Michail Chandrinos verfasserin aut Konstantinos Athanasopoulos verfasserin aut Paschalis Christodoulides verfasserin aut In Children MDPI AG, 2014 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 (DE-627)768093007 (DE-600)2732685-8 22279067 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1697, p 1697 https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1697, p 1697
allfieldsGer	10.3390/children10101697 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093158637 (DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RJ1-570 Theodoros B. Grivas verfasserin aut Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity. idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index Pediatrics Elias Vasiliadis verfasserin aut George Vynichakis verfasserin aut Michail Chandrinos verfasserin aut Konstantinos Athanasopoulos verfasserin aut Paschalis Christodoulides verfasserin aut In Children MDPI AG, 2014 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 (DE-627)768093007 (DE-600)2732685-8 22279067 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1697, p 1697 https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1697, p 1697
allfieldsSound	10.3390/children10101697 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093158637 (DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RJ1-570 Theodoros B. Grivas verfasserin aut Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity. idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index Pediatrics Elias Vasiliadis verfasserin aut George Vynichakis verfasserin aut Michail Chandrinos verfasserin aut Konstantinos Athanasopoulos verfasserin aut Paschalis Christodoulides verfasserin aut In Children MDPI AG, 2014 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 (DE-627)768093007 (DE-600)2732685-8 22279067 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1697, p 1697 https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1697, p 1697
language	English
source	In Children 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 volume:10 year:2023 number:1697, p 1697
sourceStr	In Children 10(2023), 1697, p 1697 volume:10 year:2023 number:1697, p 1697
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index Pediatrics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Children
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Theodoros B. Grivas @@aut@@ Elias Vasiliadis @@aut@@ George Vynichakis @@aut@@ Michail Chandrinos @@aut@@ Konstantinos Athanasopoulos @@aut@@ Paschalis Christodoulides @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	768093007
id	DOAJ093158637
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093158637</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413220240.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/children10101697</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093158637</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RJ1-570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Theodoros B. Grivas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">idiopathic scoliosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rib hump</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rib cage deformity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aetiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rib index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">segmental rib index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pediatrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elias Vasiliadis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">George Vynichakis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michail Chandrinos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Konstantinos Athanasopoulos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paschalis Christodoulides</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Children</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2023), 1697, p 1697</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)768093007</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2732685-8</subfield><subfield code="x">22279067</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1697, p 1697</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1697, p 1697</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Theodoros B. Grivas
spellingShingle	Theodoros B. Grivas misc RJ1-570 misc idiopathic scoliosis misc rib hump misc rib cage deformity misc aetiology misc rib index misc segmental rib index misc Pediatrics Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty
authorStr	Theodoros B. Grivas
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)768093007
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RJ1-570
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	22279067
topic_title	RJ1-570 Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty idiopathic scoliosis rib hump rib cage deformity aetiology rib index segmental rib index
topic	misc RJ1-570 misc idiopathic scoliosis misc rib hump misc rib cage deformity misc aetiology misc rib index misc segmental rib index misc Pediatrics
topic_unstemmed	misc RJ1-570 misc idiopathic scoliosis misc rib hump misc rib cage deformity misc aetiology misc rib index misc segmental rib index misc Pediatrics
topic_browse	misc RJ1-570 misc idiopathic scoliosis misc rib hump misc rib cage deformity misc aetiology misc rib index misc segmental rib index misc Pediatrics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Children
hierarchy_parent_id	768093007
hierarchy_top_title	Children
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)768093007 (DE-600)2732685-8
title	Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ093158637 (DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e
title_full	Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty
author_sort	Theodoros B. Grivas
journal	Children
journalStr	Children
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Theodoros B. Grivas Elias Vasiliadis George Vynichakis Michail Chandrinos Konstantinos Athanasopoulos Paschalis Christodoulides
container_volume	10
class	RJ1-570
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Theodoros B. Grivas
doi_str_mv	10.3390/children10101697
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	why is there always a remnant rib hump deformity after spinal operations in idiopathic scoliosis: aetiological implications and recognition of the proper rib level for costoplasty
callnumber	RJ1-570
title_auth	Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty
abstract	The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity.
abstractGer	The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity.
abstract_unstemmed	The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1697, p 1697
title_short	Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697 https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697 https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067
remote_bool	true
author2	Elias Vasiliadis George Vynichakis Michail Chandrinos Konstantinos Athanasopoulos Paschalis Christodoulides
author2Str	Elias Vasiliadis George Vynichakis Michail Chandrinos Konstantinos Athanasopoulos Paschalis Christodoulides
ppnlink	768093007
callnumber-subject	RJ - Pediatrics
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/children10101697
callnumber-a	RJ1-570
up_date	2024-07-03T15:37:44.320Z
_version_	1803572807542505472
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093158637</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413220240.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/children10101697</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093158637</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RJ1-570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Theodoros B. Grivas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of this report is to review the literature dealing with the postoperative correction of rib hump (RH) after spinal operations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its aetiological implications of hump postoperative fate for IS. Recommendations related to RH deformity for the follow-up of younger asymmetric but not scoliotic children are provided, and the concept that clinical monitoring of the chest deformity is more important than merely an initially negative radiographic examination (curve less than 10°) is underlined. Additionally, guidelines are provided based on the segments T1–T12 rib index (RI) in the existing lateral preoperative radiographs for the optimal selection of the rib level for a successfully costoplasty. This review is based on the collected articles that used either the RI method, derived from the double rib contour sign (DRCS) at the lateral spinal radiographs, or alternative methods for the assessment of the RH deformity and presented the results of the operative treatment of the scoliotic spine on RH. A total of 19 relevant articles published from 1976 to 2022 were found in PubMed. Findings: All the above articles show that not only is the hump incompletely corrected, but it recurs and worsens during the follow-up and even more intensively in skeletally immature operated scoliosis children. Conclusions and Future Directions: Surgery straightens the spine, yet the RH is corrected approximately only as much as the spinal derotation. The only way to correct the RH more is with costoplasty, which, however, is not performed in most cases for many reasons. The key reason for this phenomenon is the fact that the RH deformity (RHD) is mainly due to the asymmetric development of the ribs and much less so due to the rotation of the vertebrae in the thoracic spine. Surgery on the spine cannot limit the asymmetry of the ribs or stop the mechanism that causes their asymmetrical growth. The results presented in all the reviewed articles support the important protagonistic role of RHD on scoliogenesis, which precedes the subsequent formed spinal deformity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">idiopathic scoliosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rib hump</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rib cage deformity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aetiology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rib index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">segmental rib index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pediatrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elias Vasiliadis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">George Vynichakis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michail Chandrinos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Konstantinos Athanasopoulos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paschalis Christodoulides</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Children</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2023), 1697, p 1697</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)768093007</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2732685-8</subfield><subfield code="x">22279067</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1697, p 1697</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/children10101697</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/7f331cbd969141cfbcf982dede11bd5e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/10/1697</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1697, p 1697</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401515

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Why Is There Always a Remnant Rib Hump Deformity after Spinal Operations in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Aetiological Implications and Recognition of the Proper Rib Level for Costoplasty

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?