Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications
Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realisti...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Gemma Leslie [verfasserIn] Keith Winwood [verfasserIn] Andy Sanderson [verfasserIn] Peter Zioupos [verfasserIn] Tom Allen [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Annals of 3D Printed Medicine - Elsevier, 2021, 12(2023), Seite 100121- |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:2023 ; pages:100121- |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ093534957 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ093534957 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413012515.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ093534957 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a R855-855.5 | |
100 | 0 | |a Gemma Leslie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). | ||
650 | 4 | |a Bone surrogate | |
650 | 4 | |a Radius | |
650 | 4 | |a 3-point bending | |
650 | 4 | |a Cortical bone | |
650 | 4 | |a Fused filament fabrication | |
650 | 4 | |a Biofidelic | |
653 | 0 | |a Medical technology | |
700 | 0 | |a Keith Winwood |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Andy Sanderson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Peter Zioupos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Tom Allen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Annals of 3D Printed Medicine |d Elsevier, 2021 |g 12(2023), Seite 100121- |w (DE-627)1759893900 |x 26669641 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2023 |g pages:100121- |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2023 |h 100121- |
author_variant |
g l gl k w kw a s as p z pz t a ta |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:26669641:2023----::esbltoadtvlmnfcuigyteibnfrprsesnlrtc |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
callnumber-subject-code |
R |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093534957 (DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R855-855.5 Gemma Leslie verfasserin aut Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). Bone surrogate Radius 3-point bending Cortical bone Fused filament fabrication Biofidelic Medical technology Keith Winwood verfasserin aut Andy Sanderson verfasserin aut Peter Zioupos verfasserin aut Tom Allen verfasserin aut In Annals of 3D Printed Medicine Elsevier, 2021 12(2023), Seite 100121- (DE-627)1759893900 26669641 nnns volume:12 year:2023 pages:100121- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2023 100121- |
spelling |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093534957 (DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R855-855.5 Gemma Leslie verfasserin aut Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). Bone surrogate Radius 3-point bending Cortical bone Fused filament fabrication Biofidelic Medical technology Keith Winwood verfasserin aut Andy Sanderson verfasserin aut Peter Zioupos verfasserin aut Tom Allen verfasserin aut In Annals of 3D Printed Medicine Elsevier, 2021 12(2023), Seite 100121- (DE-627)1759893900 26669641 nnns volume:12 year:2023 pages:100121- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2023 100121- |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093534957 (DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R855-855.5 Gemma Leslie verfasserin aut Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). Bone surrogate Radius 3-point bending Cortical bone Fused filament fabrication Biofidelic Medical technology Keith Winwood verfasserin aut Andy Sanderson verfasserin aut Peter Zioupos verfasserin aut Tom Allen verfasserin aut In Annals of 3D Printed Medicine Elsevier, 2021 12(2023), Seite 100121- (DE-627)1759893900 26669641 nnns volume:12 year:2023 pages:100121- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2023 100121- |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093534957 (DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R855-855.5 Gemma Leslie verfasserin aut Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). Bone surrogate Radius 3-point bending Cortical bone Fused filament fabrication Biofidelic Medical technology Keith Winwood verfasserin aut Andy Sanderson verfasserin aut Peter Zioupos verfasserin aut Tom Allen verfasserin aut In Annals of 3D Printed Medicine Elsevier, 2021 12(2023), Seite 100121- (DE-627)1759893900 26669641 nnns volume:12 year:2023 pages:100121- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2023 100121- |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093534957 (DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R855-855.5 Gemma Leslie verfasserin aut Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). Bone surrogate Radius 3-point bending Cortical bone Fused filament fabrication Biofidelic Medical technology Keith Winwood verfasserin aut Andy Sanderson verfasserin aut Peter Zioupos verfasserin aut Tom Allen verfasserin aut In Annals of 3D Printed Medicine Elsevier, 2021 12(2023), Seite 100121- (DE-627)1759893900 26669641 nnns volume:12 year:2023 pages:100121- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2023 100121- |
language |
English |
source |
In Annals of 3D Printed Medicine 12(2023), Seite 100121- volume:12 year:2023 pages:100121- |
sourceStr |
In Annals of 3D Printed Medicine 12(2023), Seite 100121- volume:12 year:2023 pages:100121- |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Bone surrogate Radius 3-point bending Cortical bone Fused filament fabrication Biofidelic Medical technology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gemma Leslie @@aut@@ Keith Winwood @@aut@@ Andy Sanderson @@aut@@ Peter Zioupos @@aut@@ Tom Allen @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1759893900 |
id |
DOAJ093534957 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093534957</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413012515.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093534957</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R855-855.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gemma Leslie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bone surrogate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Radius</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3-point bending</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cortical bone</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fused filament fabrication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biofidelic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medical technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keith Winwood</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andy Sanderson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Zioupos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tom Allen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of 3D Printed Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2023), Seite 100121-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1759893900</subfield><subfield code="x">26669641</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100121-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">100121-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Gemma Leslie |
spellingShingle |
Gemma Leslie misc R855-855.5 misc Bone surrogate misc Radius misc 3-point bending misc Cortical bone misc Fused filament fabrication misc Biofidelic misc Medical technology Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications |
authorStr |
Gemma Leslie |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1759893900 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
R855-855 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
26669641 |
topic_title |
R855-855.5 Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications Bone surrogate Radius 3-point bending Cortical bone Fused filament fabrication Biofidelic |
topic |
misc R855-855.5 misc Bone surrogate misc Radius misc 3-point bending misc Cortical bone misc Fused filament fabrication misc Biofidelic misc Medical technology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc R855-855.5 misc Bone surrogate misc Radius misc 3-point bending misc Cortical bone misc Fused filament fabrication misc Biofidelic misc Medical technology |
topic_browse |
misc R855-855.5 misc Bone surrogate misc Radius misc 3-point bending misc Cortical bone misc Fused filament fabrication misc Biofidelic misc Medical technology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1759893900 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1759893900 |
title |
Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ093534957 (DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 |
title_full |
Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications |
author_sort |
Gemma Leslie |
journal |
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine |
journalStr |
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
100121 |
author_browse |
Gemma Leslie Keith Winwood Andy Sanderson Peter Zioupos Tom Allen |
container_volume |
12 |
class |
R855-855.5 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Gemma Leslie |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications |
callnumber |
R855-855.5 |
title_auth |
Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications |
abstract |
Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). |
abstractGer |
Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). |
abstract_unstemmed |
Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa). |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Keith Winwood Andy Sanderson Peter Zioupos Tom Allen |
author2Str |
Keith Winwood Andy Sanderson Peter Zioupos Tom Allen |
ppnlink |
1759893900 |
callnumber-subject |
R - General Medicine |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121 |
callnumber-a |
R855-855.5 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T17:54:01.352Z |
_version_ |
1803581381782011904 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093534957</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413012515.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093534957</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdaf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R855-855.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gemma Leslie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Feasibility of additively manufacturing synthetic bone for sports personal protective equipment applications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Human limb surrogates, of varying biofidelity, are used in the performance assessment of sports personal protective equipment (PPE). Such biofidelic surrogates have incorporated soft tissue simulants (silicones) and synthetic bone (short fibre filled epoxy). Testing surrogates incorporating realistic synthetic bone could help to further our knowledge of fracture trauma mechanics, and applications such as the effectiveness of sports PPE. Limb surrogates with embedded synthetic bone are rarely tested to fracture, mainly due to the effort and cost of replacing them. This paper proposes additive manufacturing of synthetic bones, with appropriate bone like fracture characteristics, potentially making them more accessible and cost effective. A Markforged® X7™ printer was used as it prints a base filament (Onyx™) alongside a continuous strand of reinforcement (e.g., carbon fibre). The properties of specimens from this printer vary with the type, volume fraction and position of reinforcement. Bar specimens (10 × 4 × 120 mm) with varying amounts of carbon fibre reinforcement were printed for three-point bend testing to determine the feasibility of achieving mechanical properties close to compact bone (bending modulus of ∼15 GPa, bending strength of ∼180 MPa). Bending strength for the various bar specimens ranged from 32 to 378 MPa, and modulus values ranged from 1.5 to 25.8 GPa. Based on these results, four 140 mm long oval shaped cylindrical specimens of ø14 and ø16 mm were printed to represent a basic radius bone model. Three-point bend testing of these bone models showed similar bending modulus (3.8 to 5.3 GPa vs. 3.66 to 14.8 GPa) to radius bones reported in the literature, but higher bending strength (147 to 200 MPa vs. 80.31 ± 14.55 MPa).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bone surrogate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Radius</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3-point bending</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cortical bone</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fused filament fabrication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biofidelic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medical technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keith Winwood</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andy Sanderson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peter Zioupos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tom Allen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Annals of 3D Printed Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2023), Seite 100121-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1759893900</subfield><subfield code="x">26669641</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100121-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100121</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/daf8c734570d48e99e5283a8b2eb5db9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266696412300022X</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9641</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">100121-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3996124 |