Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat
The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sharul Baggio Roslan [verfasserIn] Zhi Yung Tay [verfasserIn] Dimitrios Konovessis [verfasserIn] Joo Hock Ang [verfasserIn] Nirmal Vineeth Menon [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Marine Science and Engineering - MDPI AG, 2014, 11(2023), 7, p 1307 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2023 ; number:7, p 1307 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/jmse11071307 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ093880219 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ093880219 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413022103.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/jmse11071307 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ093880219 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a VM1-989 | |
050 | 0 | |a GC1-1581 | |
100 | 0 | |a Sharul Baggio Roslan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. | ||
650 | 4 | |a hybrid marine power system | |
650 | 4 | |a LNG | |
650 | 4 | |a hybrid tugboat | |
650 | 4 | |a energy efficiency operation index | |
650 | 4 | |a carbon intensity indicator | |
650 | 4 | |a system modelling | |
653 | 0 | |a Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering | |
653 | 0 | |a Oceanography | |
700 | 0 | |a Zhi Yung Tay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Dimitrios Konovessis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Joo Hock Ang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Nirmal Vineeth Menon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |d MDPI AG, 2014 |g 11(2023), 7, p 1307 |w (DE-627)771274181 |w (DE-600)2738390-8 |x 20771312 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2023 |g number:7, p 1307 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2023 |e 7, p 1307 |
author_variant |
s b r sbr z y t zyt d k dk j h a jha n v m nvm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:20771312:2023----::ueaecnrltdeolgatrh |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
callnumber-subject-code |
VM |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.3390/jmse11071307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093880219 (DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng VM1-989 GC1-1581 Sharul Baggio Roslan verfasserin aut Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. hybrid marine power system LNG hybrid tugboat energy efficiency operation index carbon intensity indicator system modelling Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering Oceanography Zhi Yung Tay verfasserin aut Dimitrios Konovessis verfasserin aut Joo Hock Ang verfasserin aut Nirmal Vineeth Menon verfasserin aut In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering MDPI AG, 2014 11(2023), 7, p 1307 (DE-627)771274181 (DE-600)2738390-8 20771312 nnns volume:11 year:2023 number:7, p 1307 https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 7, p 1307 |
spelling |
10.3390/jmse11071307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093880219 (DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng VM1-989 GC1-1581 Sharul Baggio Roslan verfasserin aut Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. hybrid marine power system LNG hybrid tugboat energy efficiency operation index carbon intensity indicator system modelling Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering Oceanography Zhi Yung Tay verfasserin aut Dimitrios Konovessis verfasserin aut Joo Hock Ang verfasserin aut Nirmal Vineeth Menon verfasserin aut In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering MDPI AG, 2014 11(2023), 7, p 1307 (DE-627)771274181 (DE-600)2738390-8 20771312 nnns volume:11 year:2023 number:7, p 1307 https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 7, p 1307 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/jmse11071307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093880219 (DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng VM1-989 GC1-1581 Sharul Baggio Roslan verfasserin aut Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. hybrid marine power system LNG hybrid tugboat energy efficiency operation index carbon intensity indicator system modelling Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering Oceanography Zhi Yung Tay verfasserin aut Dimitrios Konovessis verfasserin aut Joo Hock Ang verfasserin aut Nirmal Vineeth Menon verfasserin aut In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering MDPI AG, 2014 11(2023), 7, p 1307 (DE-627)771274181 (DE-600)2738390-8 20771312 nnns volume:11 year:2023 number:7, p 1307 https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 7, p 1307 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/jmse11071307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093880219 (DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng VM1-989 GC1-1581 Sharul Baggio Roslan verfasserin aut Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. hybrid marine power system LNG hybrid tugboat energy efficiency operation index carbon intensity indicator system modelling Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering Oceanography Zhi Yung Tay verfasserin aut Dimitrios Konovessis verfasserin aut Joo Hock Ang verfasserin aut Nirmal Vineeth Menon verfasserin aut In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering MDPI AG, 2014 11(2023), 7, p 1307 (DE-627)771274181 (DE-600)2738390-8 20771312 nnns volume:11 year:2023 number:7, p 1307 https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 7, p 1307 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/jmse11071307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093880219 (DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng VM1-989 GC1-1581 Sharul Baggio Roslan verfasserin aut Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. hybrid marine power system LNG hybrid tugboat energy efficiency operation index carbon intensity indicator system modelling Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering Oceanography Zhi Yung Tay verfasserin aut Dimitrios Konovessis verfasserin aut Joo Hock Ang verfasserin aut Nirmal Vineeth Menon verfasserin aut In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering MDPI AG, 2014 11(2023), 7, p 1307 (DE-627)771274181 (DE-600)2738390-8 20771312 nnns volume:11 year:2023 number:7, p 1307 https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2023 7, p 1307 |
language |
English |
source |
In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11(2023), 7, p 1307 volume:11 year:2023 number:7, p 1307 |
sourceStr |
In Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11(2023), 7, p 1307 volume:11 year:2023 number:7, p 1307 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
hybrid marine power system LNG hybrid tugboat energy efficiency operation index carbon intensity indicator system modelling Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering Oceanography |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sharul Baggio Roslan @@aut@@ Zhi Yung Tay @@aut@@ Dimitrios Konovessis @@aut@@ Joo Hock Ang @@aut@@ Nirmal Vineeth Menon @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
771274181 |
id |
DOAJ093880219 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093880219</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413022103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jmse11071307</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093880219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">VM1-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GC1-1581</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharul Baggio Roslan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hybrid marine power system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LNG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hybrid tugboat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">energy efficiency operation index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carbon intensity indicator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">system modelling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Oceanography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhi Yung Tay</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dimitrios Konovessis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Joo Hock Ang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nirmal Vineeth Menon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Marine Science and Engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2023), 7, p 1307</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)771274181</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2738390-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20771312</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7, p 1307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">7, p 1307</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
V - Naval Science |
author |
Sharul Baggio Roslan |
spellingShingle |
Sharul Baggio Roslan misc VM1-989 misc GC1-1581 misc hybrid marine power system misc LNG misc hybrid tugboat misc energy efficiency operation index misc carbon intensity indicator misc system modelling misc Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering misc Oceanography Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat |
authorStr |
Sharul Baggio Roslan |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)771274181 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
VM1-989 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
20771312 |
topic_title |
VM1-989 GC1-1581 Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat hybrid marine power system LNG hybrid tugboat energy efficiency operation index carbon intensity indicator system modelling |
topic |
misc VM1-989 misc GC1-1581 misc hybrid marine power system misc LNG misc hybrid tugboat misc energy efficiency operation index misc carbon intensity indicator misc system modelling misc Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering misc Oceanography |
topic_unstemmed |
misc VM1-989 misc GC1-1581 misc hybrid marine power system misc LNG misc hybrid tugboat misc energy efficiency operation index misc carbon intensity indicator misc system modelling misc Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering misc Oceanography |
topic_browse |
misc VM1-989 misc GC1-1581 misc hybrid marine power system misc LNG misc hybrid tugboat misc energy efficiency operation index misc carbon intensity indicator misc system modelling misc Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering misc Oceanography |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
771274181 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)771274181 (DE-600)2738390-8 |
title |
Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ093880219 (DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 |
title_full |
Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat |
author_sort |
Sharul Baggio Roslan |
journal |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
journalStr |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
callnumber-first-code |
V |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Sharul Baggio Roslan Zhi Yung Tay Dimitrios Konovessis Joo Hock Ang Nirmal Vineeth Menon |
container_volume |
11 |
class |
VM1-989 GC1-1581 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sharul Baggio Roslan |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/jmse11071307 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
rule-based control studies of lng–battery hybrid tugboat |
callnumber |
VM1-989 |
title_auth |
Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat |
abstract |
The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. |
abstractGer |
The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
7, p 1307 |
title_short |
Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307 https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307 https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Zhi Yung Tay Dimitrios Konovessis Joo Hock Ang Nirmal Vineeth Menon |
author2Str |
Zhi Yung Tay Dimitrios Konovessis Joo Hock Ang Nirmal Vineeth Menon |
ppnlink |
771274181 |
callnumber-subject |
VM - Naval Architecture, Shipbuilding, Marine Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/jmse11071307 |
callnumber-a |
VM1-989 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:56:15.032Z |
_version_ |
1803589071724871680 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093880219</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413022103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/jmse11071307</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093880219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">VM1-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GC1-1581</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharul Baggio Roslan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule-Based Control Studies of LNG–Battery Hybrid Tugboat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The use of hybrid energy systems in ships has increased in recent years due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. This paper focuses on the development and study of a hybrid energy system using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and batteries for a tugboat. The hybrid system model is created in MATLAB/Simulink<sup<®</sup< and uses fuel data obtained from an operational diesel-powered tugboat. The LNG–hybrid system is then subjected to testing in four distinct configurations: fixed speed, variable speed, and with and without a battery. The different configurations are compared by computing the daily fuel cost, CO<sub<2</sub< emissions, energy efficiency operation indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<E</mi<<mi<E</mi<<mi<O</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) and carbon intensity indicator (<inline-formula<<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"<<semantics<<mrow<<mi<C</mi<<mi<I</mi<<mi<I</mi<</mrow<</semantics<</math<</inline-formula<) ratings in three distinct operation cases. The analysis reveals that the use of an LNG–battery hybrid tugboat results in an average reduction of 67.2% in CO<sub<2</sub< emissions and an average decrease of 64.0% in daily fuel cost compared to a diesel system. An energy management system using rule-based (RB) control is incorporated to compare the daily cost and CO<sub<2</sub< emissions for one of the case studies. The rule-based control that requires the battery to be used and the LNG engine to be switched off at the lowest allowable minimum power based on the specific gas consumption produces the most cost-effective control strategy out of all the different control strategies tested. The result demonstrates that an additional reduction of CO<sub<2</sub< and daily fuel cost for LNG–battery hybrid tugboats by 23.8% and 22.3%, respectively, could be achieved with the implementation of the cost-effective strategy as compared to not having a control strategy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hybrid marine power system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LNG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hybrid tugboat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">energy efficiency operation index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">carbon intensity indicator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">system modelling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Oceanography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhi Yung Tay</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dimitrios Konovessis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Joo Hock Ang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nirmal Vineeth Menon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Marine Science and Engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2023), 7, p 1307</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)771274181</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2738390-8</subfield><subfield code="x">20771312</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7, p 1307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071307</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/45c92249cf2e4388bea11a3b8a9de527</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/11/7/1307</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1312</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">7, p 1307</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400174 |