Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China

Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Xueyan Wang [verfasserIn] Zhenhua Di [verfasserIn] Jianguo Liu [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Remote Sensing - MDPI AG, 2009, 15(2023), 13, p 3260
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:15 ; year:2023 ; number:13, p 3260

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/rs15133260

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ093982798

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ093982798
003	DE-627
005	20240413023801.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240413s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/rs15133260 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ093982798
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Xueyan Wang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion.
650		4	\|a forest fires
650		4	\|a burned area
650		4	\|a evaluation of BA satellite products
653		0	\|a Science
653		0	\|a Q
700	0		\|a Zhenhua Di \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jianguo Liu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Remote Sensing \|d MDPI AG, 2009 \|g 15(2023), 13, p 3260 \|w (DE-627)608937916 \|w (DE-600)2513863-7 \|x 20724292 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:15 \|g year:2023 \|g number:13, p 3260
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 15 \|j 2023 \|e 13, p 3260

Indexfelder

author_variant	x w xw z d zd j l jl
matchkey_str	article:20724292:2023----::vlaighaiiisfaeltdrvdundrardcsoe
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.3390/rs15133260 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093982798 (DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xueyan Wang verfasserin aut Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion. forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products Science Q Zhenhua Di verfasserin aut Jianguo Liu verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 15(2023), 13, p 3260 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:15 year:2023 number:13, p 3260 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2023 13, p 3260
spelling	10.3390/rs15133260 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093982798 (DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xueyan Wang verfasserin aut Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion. forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products Science Q Zhenhua Di verfasserin aut Jianguo Liu verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 15(2023), 13, p 3260 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:15 year:2023 number:13, p 3260 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2023 13, p 3260
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/rs15133260 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093982798 (DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xueyan Wang verfasserin aut Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion. forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products Science Q Zhenhua Di verfasserin aut Jianguo Liu verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 15(2023), 13, p 3260 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:15 year:2023 number:13, p 3260 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2023 13, p 3260
allfieldsGer	10.3390/rs15133260 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093982798 (DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xueyan Wang verfasserin aut Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion. forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products Science Q Zhenhua Di verfasserin aut Jianguo Liu verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 15(2023), 13, p 3260 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:15 year:2023 number:13, p 3260 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2023 13, p 3260
allfieldsSound	10.3390/rs15133260 doi (DE-627)DOAJ093982798 (DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xueyan Wang verfasserin aut Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion. forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products Science Q Zhenhua Di verfasserin aut Jianguo Liu verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 15(2023), 13, p 3260 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:15 year:2023 number:13, p 3260 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2023 13, p 3260
language	English
source	In Remote Sensing 15(2023), 13, p 3260 volume:15 year:2023 number:13, p 3260
sourceStr	In Remote Sensing 15(2023), 13, p 3260 volume:15 year:2023 number:13, p 3260
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products Science Q
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Remote Sensing
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Xueyan Wang @@aut@@ Zhenhua Di @@aut@@ Jianguo Liu @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	608937916
id	DOAJ093982798
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093982798</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413023801.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs15133260</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093982798</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xueyan Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forest fires</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">burned area</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluation of BA satellite products</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhenhua Di</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jianguo Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2023), 13, p 3260</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:13, p 3260</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">13, p 3260</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Xueyan Wang
spellingShingle	Xueyan Wang misc forest fires misc burned area misc evaluation of BA satellite products misc Science misc Q Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China
authorStr	Xueyan Wang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)608937916
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20724292
topic_title	Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China forest fires burned area evaluation of BA satellite products
topic	misc forest fires misc burned area misc evaluation of BA satellite products misc Science misc Q
topic_unstemmed	misc forest fires misc burned area misc evaluation of BA satellite products misc Science misc Q
topic_browse	misc forest fires misc burned area misc evaluation of BA satellite products misc Science misc Q
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Remote Sensing
hierarchy_parent_id	608937916
hierarchy_top_title	Remote Sensing
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7
title	Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ093982798 (DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41
title_full	Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China
author_sort	Xueyan Wang
journal	Remote Sensing
journalStr	Remote Sensing
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Xueyan Wang Zhenhua Di Jianguo Liu
container_volume	15
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Xueyan Wang
doi_str_mv	10.3390/rs15133260
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	evaluating the abilities of satellite-derived burned area products to detect forest burning in china
title_auth	Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China
abstract	Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion.
abstractGer	Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion.
abstract_unstemmed	Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	13, p 3260
title_short	Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260 https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
remote_bool	true
author2	Zhenhua Di Jianguo Liu
author2Str	Zhenhua Di Jianguo Liu
ppnlink	608937916
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/rs15133260
up_date	2024-07-03T20:33:27.132Z
_version_	1803591412232486913
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ093982798</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413023801.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs15133260</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ093982798</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xueyan Wang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fire plays a prominent role in the construction and destruction of ecosystems, and the accurate estimation of the burned area (BA) after a fire occurrence is of great significance to protect ecosystems and save people’s lives and property. This study evaluated the performances of three publicly available BA satellite products (GFED4, MCD64CMQ, and FireCCI5.1) in detecting Chinese forest fire burning from 2001 to 2016 across different time scales (yearly, monthly, and seasonally) and spatial scales (regional and provincial). The reference data were derived from the monthly China Forestry Statistical Yearbook (CFSY), and they were mainly used to evaluate the detection ability of each of the three BA products in the three major forest fire areas of China consisting of the Northeast (NE), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions. The main results are as follows: (1) A significant declining BA trend was demonstrated in the whole study area and in the NE and SE subregions. Specifically, the slopes for the whole area ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, the slopes for the NE region ranged from −3821.1 ha/year for MCD64CMQ to −33,218 ha/year for the CFSY, and the slopes for the SE region ranged from −594.24 ha/year for GFED4 to −3162.1 ha/year for the CFSY. The BA in China was mainly dominated by forest fires in the NE region, especially in 2003 and 2006 when this region accounted for 90% and 87% of occurrences, respectively. (2) Compared with the CFSY, GFED4 had the best performance at the yearly scale with an RMSE of 23.9 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/year and CC of 0.83. Similarly, at the monthly scale, GFED4 also had the best performance for the three regions, with the lowest RMSE ranging from 0.33 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 5.4 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month—far lower than that of FireCC5.1 which ranged from 1.16 × 10<sup<4</sup< to 8.56 × 10<sup<4</sup< ha/month (except for the SE region where it was slightly worse than MCD64CMQ). At the seasonal scale, GFFD4 had the best performance in spring and winter. It was also noted that the fewer BAs in summer made the differences among the products insignificant. (3) Spatially, GFED4 had the best performance in RMSEs for all the provinces of the three regions, in CCs for the provinces of the SW and SE regions, and in MEs for the provinces of the SE region. (4) All three products had stronger detection abilities for severe and disaster fires than for common fires. Additionally, GFED4 had a more consistent number of months with the CFSY than the other products in the NE region. Moreover, the conclusion that GFED4 had the best performance in the China region was also proved using other validated BA datasets. These results will help us to understand the BA detection abilities of the satellite products in China and promote the further development of multi-source satellite fire data fusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">forest fires</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">burned area</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluation of BA satellite products</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhenhua Di</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jianguo Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2023), 13, p 3260</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:13, p 3260</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133260</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d5d52f412f29444382464632583b4a41</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/13/3260</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">13, p 3260</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398514

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Evaluating the Abilities of Satellite-Derived Burned Area Products to Detect Forest Burning in China

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?