Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data
High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Anubhav Shukla [verfasserIn] Anup K. Prasad [verfasserIn] Sameeksha Mishra [verfasserIn] Arya Vinod [verfasserIn] Atul K. Varma [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Minerals - MDPI AG, 2012, 13(2023), 5, p 634 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:13 ; year:2023 ; number:5, p 634 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3390/min13050634 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ094333793 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ094333793 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413033331.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/min13050634 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ094333793 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QE351-399.2 | |
100 | 0 | |a Anubhav Shukla |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. | ||
650 | 4 | |a sulfur content | |
650 | 4 | |a Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) | |
650 | 4 | |a Quasi-Newton (QN) method | |
650 | 4 | |a high ash | |
650 | 4 | |a Indian coal | |
653 | 0 | |a Mineralogy | |
700 | 0 | |a Anup K. Prasad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Sameeksha Mishra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Arya Vinod |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Atul K. Varma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Minerals |d MDPI AG, 2012 |g 13(2023), 5, p 634 |w (DE-627)689132069 |w (DE-600)2655947-X |x 2075163X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:5, p 634 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2023 |e 5, p 634 |
author_variant |
a s as a k p akp s m sm a v av a k v akv |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:2075163X:2023----::aietmtooslucnetnihsidacauig |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QE |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.3390/min13050634 doi (DE-627)DOAJ094333793 (DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QE351-399.2 Anubhav Shukla verfasserin aut Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. sulfur content Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Quasi-Newton (QN) method high ash Indian coal Mineralogy Anup K. Prasad verfasserin aut Sameeksha Mishra verfasserin aut Arya Vinod verfasserin aut Atul K. Varma verfasserin aut In Minerals MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 5, p 634 (DE-627)689132069 (DE-600)2655947-X 2075163X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:5, p 634 https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 5, p 634 |
spelling |
10.3390/min13050634 doi (DE-627)DOAJ094333793 (DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QE351-399.2 Anubhav Shukla verfasserin aut Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. sulfur content Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Quasi-Newton (QN) method high ash Indian coal Mineralogy Anup K. Prasad verfasserin aut Sameeksha Mishra verfasserin aut Arya Vinod verfasserin aut Atul K. Varma verfasserin aut In Minerals MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 5, p 634 (DE-627)689132069 (DE-600)2655947-X 2075163X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:5, p 634 https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 5, p 634 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/min13050634 doi (DE-627)DOAJ094333793 (DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QE351-399.2 Anubhav Shukla verfasserin aut Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. sulfur content Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Quasi-Newton (QN) method high ash Indian coal Mineralogy Anup K. Prasad verfasserin aut Sameeksha Mishra verfasserin aut Arya Vinod verfasserin aut Atul K. Varma verfasserin aut In Minerals MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 5, p 634 (DE-627)689132069 (DE-600)2655947-X 2075163X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:5, p 634 https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 5, p 634 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3390/min13050634 doi (DE-627)DOAJ094333793 (DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QE351-399.2 Anubhav Shukla verfasserin aut Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. sulfur content Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Quasi-Newton (QN) method high ash Indian coal Mineralogy Anup K. Prasad verfasserin aut Sameeksha Mishra verfasserin aut Arya Vinod verfasserin aut Atul K. Varma verfasserin aut In Minerals MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 5, p 634 (DE-627)689132069 (DE-600)2655947-X 2075163X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:5, p 634 https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 5, p 634 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3390/min13050634 doi (DE-627)DOAJ094333793 (DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QE351-399.2 Anubhav Shukla verfasserin aut Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. sulfur content Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Quasi-Newton (QN) method high ash Indian coal Mineralogy Anup K. Prasad verfasserin aut Sameeksha Mishra verfasserin aut Arya Vinod verfasserin aut Atul K. Varma verfasserin aut In Minerals MDPI AG, 2012 13(2023), 5, p 634 (DE-627)689132069 (DE-600)2655947-X 2075163X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:5, p 634 https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 5, p 634 |
language |
English |
source |
In Minerals 13(2023), 5, p 634 volume:13 year:2023 number:5, p 634 |
sourceStr |
In Minerals 13(2023), 5, p 634 volume:13 year:2023 number:5, p 634 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
sulfur content Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Quasi-Newton (QN) method high ash Indian coal Mineralogy |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Minerals |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Anubhav Shukla @@aut@@ Anup K. Prasad @@aut@@ Sameeksha Mishra @@aut@@ Arya Vinod @@aut@@ Atul K. Varma @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
689132069 |
id |
DOAJ094333793 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ094333793</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413033331.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/min13050634</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ094333793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QE351-399.2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anubhav Shukla</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sulfur content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quasi-Newton (QN) method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">high ash</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Indian coal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mineralogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anup K. Prasad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sameeksha Mishra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arya Vinod</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Atul K. Varma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Minerals</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 5, p 634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)689132069</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2655947-X</subfield><subfield code="x">2075163X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 634</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Anubhav Shukla |
spellingShingle |
Anubhav Shukla misc QE351-399.2 misc sulfur content misc Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) misc Quasi-Newton (QN) method misc high ash misc Indian coal misc Mineralogy Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data |
authorStr |
Anubhav Shukla |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)689132069 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QE351-399 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2075163X |
topic_title |
QE351-399.2 Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data sulfur content Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Quasi-Newton (QN) method high ash Indian coal |
topic |
misc QE351-399.2 misc sulfur content misc Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) misc Quasi-Newton (QN) method misc high ash misc Indian coal misc Mineralogy |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QE351-399.2 misc sulfur content misc Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) misc Quasi-Newton (QN) method misc high ash misc Indian coal misc Mineralogy |
topic_browse |
misc QE351-399.2 misc sulfur content misc Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) misc Quasi-Newton (QN) method misc high ash misc Indian coal misc Mineralogy |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Minerals |
hierarchy_parent_id |
689132069 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Minerals |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)689132069 (DE-600)2655947-X |
title |
Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ094333793 (DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c |
title_full |
Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data |
author_sort |
Anubhav Shukla |
journal |
Minerals |
journalStr |
Minerals |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Anubhav Shukla Anup K. Prasad Sameeksha Mishra Arya Vinod Atul K. Varma |
container_volume |
13 |
class |
QE351-399.2 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Anubhav Shukla |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/min13050634 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
rapid estimation of sulfur content in high-ash indian coal using mid-infrared ftir data |
callnumber |
QE351-399.2 |
title_auth |
Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data |
abstract |
High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. |
abstractGer |
High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. |
abstract_unstemmed |
High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
5, p 634 |
title_short |
Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634 https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634 https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Anup K. Prasad Sameeksha Mishra Arya Vinod Atul K. Varma |
author2Str |
Anup K. Prasad Sameeksha Mishra Arya Vinod Atul K. Varma |
ppnlink |
689132069 |
callnumber-subject |
QE - Geology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3390/min13050634 |
callnumber-a |
QE351-399.2 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:35:16.943Z |
_version_ |
1803599077121720320 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ094333793</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413033331.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/min13050634</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ094333793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QE351-399.2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anubhav Shukla</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rapid Estimation of Sulfur Content in High-Ash Indian Coal Using Mid-Infrared FTIR Data</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">High-ash Indian coals are primarily used as thermal coal in power plants and industries. Due to the presence of sulfur in thermal coal, flue gas is a major environmental concern. Conventional methods (Ultimate Analysis of Coal) for sulfur content estimation are time-consuming, relatively costly, and destructive. In this study, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising alternative method for the rapid and nondestructive analysis of the sulfur content in coal. In the present study, the actual sulfur content in the coal samples was determined using Ultimate Analysis (CHNS analyzer). In contrast, mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopic data (4000–400 cm<sup<−1</sup<) were used to analyze the functional groups related to sulfur or its compounds in the coal samples to predict the sulfur content. A comparison of sulfur estimated using a CHNS analyzer and predicted using mid-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data shows that it can accurately predict sulfur content in high-ash Indian coals using the piecewise linear regression method (Quasi-Newton, QN). The proposed FTIR-based sulfur prediction model showed a coefficient of determination (R<sup<2</sup<) of up to 0.93, where the total no. of samples (Coal + KBr pellets, n) was 126 (using 17:1 split, K-fold cross validation). The root-mean-square error (RMSE, wt.%) is 0.0035, mean bias error (MBE, wt.%) is −0.0003, MBE (%) is 3.31% and mean absolute error (MAE, wt.%) is 0.0020. The two-tailed t-test and F-test for mean and variance indicated no significant difference between the pair of values of observed sulfur (S<sub<CHNS,</sub< wt.%) using CHNS data and the model predicted sulfur (S<sub<FTIR,</sub< wt.%) using FTIR data. The prediction model using mid-infrared FTIR spectroscopy data and the Quasi-Newton method with a breakpoint and loss function performs well for coal samples from the Johilla Coalfield, Umaria. Thus, it can be a valuable tool for analyzing sulfur in other ash-rich coals from various basins worldwide.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sulfur content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quasi-Newton (QN) method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">high ash</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Indian coal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mineralogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anup K. Prasad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sameeksha Mishra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arya Vinod</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Atul K. Varma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Minerals</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 5, p 634</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)689132069</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2655947-X</subfield><subfield code="x">2075163X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5, p 634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050634</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3b28126e179b46c9b4b8e4de4764361c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/5/634</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2075-163X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">5, p 634</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4030848 |