Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China
Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance so...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jun Sun [verfasserIn] Wenquan Niu [verfasserIn] Yadan Du [verfasserIn] Qian Zhang [verfasserIn] Guochun Li [verfasserIn] Li Ma [verfasserIn] Jinjin Zhu [verfasserIn] Fei Mu [verfasserIn] Dan Sun [verfasserIn] Haicheng Gan [verfasserIn] Kadambot H.M. Siddique [verfasserIn] Sajjad Ali [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Agricultural Water Management ; 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 ; year:2023 ; pages:108503- |
---|
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ095365842 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ095365842 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240413104015.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ095365842 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a S1-972 | |
050 | 0 | |a HD9000-9495 | |
100 | 0 | |a Jun Sun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Tillage | |
650 | 4 | |a Abnormal precipitation | |
650 | 4 | |a Root growth | |
650 | 4 | |a Lodging | |
650 | 4 | |a Yield stability | |
650 | 4 | |a Water use efficiency | |
653 | 0 | |a Agriculture (General) | |
653 | 0 | |a Agricultural industries | |
700 | 0 | |a Wenquan Niu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Yadan Du |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Qian Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Guochun Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Li Ma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Jinjin Zhu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Fei Mu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Dan Sun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Haicheng Gan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Kadambot H.M. Siddique |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Sajjad Ali |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Agricultural Water Management |g 289(2023), Seite 108503- |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:289 |g year:2023 |g pages:108503- |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 289 |j 2023 |h 108503- |
author_variant |
j s js w n wn y d yd q z qz g l gl l m lm j z jz f m fm d s ds h g hg k h s khs s a sa |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
junsunwenquanniuyadanduqianzhangguochunl:2023----:obndilgaaaeettaeyomrvrifdaztlrneoxrm |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
callnumber-subject-code |
S |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095365842 (DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 HD9000-9495 Jun Sun verfasserin aut Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. Tillage Abnormal precipitation Root growth Lodging Yield stability Water use efficiency Agriculture (General) Agricultural industries Wenquan Niu verfasserin aut Yadan Du verfasserin aut Qian Zhang verfasserin aut Guochun Li verfasserin aut Li Ma verfasserin aut Jinjin Zhu verfasserin aut Fei Mu verfasserin aut Dan Sun verfasserin aut Haicheng Gan verfasserin aut Kadambot H.M. Siddique verfasserin aut Sajjad Ali verfasserin aut In Agricultural Water Management 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 year:2023 pages:108503- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 289 2023 108503- |
spelling |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095365842 (DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 HD9000-9495 Jun Sun verfasserin aut Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. Tillage Abnormal precipitation Root growth Lodging Yield stability Water use efficiency Agriculture (General) Agricultural industries Wenquan Niu verfasserin aut Yadan Du verfasserin aut Qian Zhang verfasserin aut Guochun Li verfasserin aut Li Ma verfasserin aut Jinjin Zhu verfasserin aut Fei Mu verfasserin aut Dan Sun verfasserin aut Haicheng Gan verfasserin aut Kadambot H.M. Siddique verfasserin aut Sajjad Ali verfasserin aut In Agricultural Water Management 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 year:2023 pages:108503- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 289 2023 108503- |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095365842 (DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 HD9000-9495 Jun Sun verfasserin aut Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. Tillage Abnormal precipitation Root growth Lodging Yield stability Water use efficiency Agriculture (General) Agricultural industries Wenquan Niu verfasserin aut Yadan Du verfasserin aut Qian Zhang verfasserin aut Guochun Li verfasserin aut Li Ma verfasserin aut Jinjin Zhu verfasserin aut Fei Mu verfasserin aut Dan Sun verfasserin aut Haicheng Gan verfasserin aut Kadambot H.M. Siddique verfasserin aut Sajjad Ali verfasserin aut In Agricultural Water Management 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 year:2023 pages:108503- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 289 2023 108503- |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095365842 (DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 HD9000-9495 Jun Sun verfasserin aut Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. Tillage Abnormal precipitation Root growth Lodging Yield stability Water use efficiency Agriculture (General) Agricultural industries Wenquan Niu verfasserin aut Yadan Du verfasserin aut Qian Zhang verfasserin aut Guochun Li verfasserin aut Li Ma verfasserin aut Jinjin Zhu verfasserin aut Fei Mu verfasserin aut Dan Sun verfasserin aut Haicheng Gan verfasserin aut Kadambot H.M. Siddique verfasserin aut Sajjad Ali verfasserin aut In Agricultural Water Management 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 year:2023 pages:108503- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 289 2023 108503- |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095365842 (DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng S1-972 HD9000-9495 Jun Sun verfasserin aut Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. Tillage Abnormal precipitation Root growth Lodging Yield stability Water use efficiency Agriculture (General) Agricultural industries Wenquan Niu verfasserin aut Yadan Du verfasserin aut Qian Zhang verfasserin aut Guochun Li verfasserin aut Li Ma verfasserin aut Jinjin Zhu verfasserin aut Fei Mu verfasserin aut Dan Sun verfasserin aut Haicheng Gan verfasserin aut Kadambot H.M. Siddique verfasserin aut Sajjad Ali verfasserin aut In Agricultural Water Management 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 year:2023 pages:108503- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 289 2023 108503- |
language |
English |
source |
In Agricultural Water Management 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 year:2023 pages:108503- |
sourceStr |
In Agricultural Water Management 289(2023), Seite 108503- volume:289 year:2023 pages:108503- |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Tillage Abnormal precipitation Root growth Lodging Yield stability Water use efficiency Agriculture (General) Agricultural industries |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Agricultural Water Management |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jun Sun @@aut@@ Wenquan Niu @@aut@@ Yadan Du @@aut@@ Qian Zhang @@aut@@ Guochun Li @@aut@@ Li Ma @@aut@@ Jinjin Zhu @@aut@@ Fei Mu @@aut@@ Dan Sun @@aut@@ Haicheng Gan @@aut@@ Kadambot H.M. Siddique @@aut@@ Sajjad Ali @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
id |
DOAJ095365842 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ095365842</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413104015.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ095365842</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD9000-9495</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jun Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abnormal precipitation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Root growth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lodging</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Yield stability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Water use efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agricultural industries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenquan Niu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yadan Du</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qian Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guochun Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li Ma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jinjin Zhu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fei Mu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dan Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haicheng Gan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kadambot H.M. Siddique</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sajjad Ali</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agricultural Water Management</subfield><subfield code="g">289(2023), Seite 108503-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:289</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108503-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">289</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">108503-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
author |
Jun Sun |
spellingShingle |
Jun Sun misc S1-972 misc HD9000-9495 misc Tillage misc Abnormal precipitation misc Root growth misc Lodging misc Yield stability misc Water use efficiency misc Agriculture (General) misc Agricultural industries Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China |
authorStr |
Jun Sun |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
S1-972 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
S1-972 HD9000-9495 Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China Tillage Abnormal precipitation Root growth Lodging Yield stability Water use efficiency |
topic |
misc S1-972 misc HD9000-9495 misc Tillage misc Abnormal precipitation misc Root growth misc Lodging misc Yield stability misc Water use efficiency misc Agriculture (General) misc Agricultural industries |
topic_unstemmed |
misc S1-972 misc HD9000-9495 misc Tillage misc Abnormal precipitation misc Root growth misc Lodging misc Yield stability misc Water use efficiency misc Agriculture (General) misc Agricultural industries |
topic_browse |
misc S1-972 misc HD9000-9495 misc Tillage misc Abnormal precipitation misc Root growth misc Lodging misc Yield stability misc Water use efficiency misc Agriculture (General) misc Agricultural industries |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Agricultural Water Management |
hierarchy_top_title |
Agricultural Water Management |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
title |
Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ095365842 (DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 |
title_full |
Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China |
author_sort |
Jun Sun |
journal |
Agricultural Water Management |
journalStr |
Agricultural Water Management |
callnumber-first-code |
S |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
108503 |
author_browse |
Jun Sun Wenquan Niu Yadan Du Qian Zhang Guochun Li Li Ma Jinjin Zhu Fei Mu Dan Sun Haicheng Gan Kadambot H.M. Siddique Sajjad Ali |
container_volume |
289 |
class |
S1-972 HD9000-9495 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jun Sun |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
combined tillage: a management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern china |
callnumber |
S1-972 |
title_auth |
Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China |
abstract |
Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. |
abstractGer |
Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
title_short |
Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682 https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Wenquan Niu Yadan Du Qian Zhang Guochun Li Li Ma Jinjin Zhu Fei Mu Dan Sun Haicheng Gan Kadambot H.M. Siddique Sajjad Ali |
author2Str |
Wenquan Niu Yadan Du Qian Zhang Guochun Li Li Ma Jinjin Zhu Fei Mu Dan Sun Haicheng Gan Kadambot H.M. Siddique Sajjad Ali |
callnumber-subject |
S - General Agriculture |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503 |
callnumber-a |
S1-972 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:14:41.799Z |
_version_ |
1803567582993711104 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ095365842</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413104015.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ095365842</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HD9000-9495</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jun Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Combined tillage: A management strategy to improve rainfed maize tolerance to extreme events in northwestern China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Climate warming has increased the frequency of droughts and excessive precipitation, adversely affecting crop growth, particularly under traditional intensive tillage. No-till improves crop tolerance to extreme events by reducing soil evaporation and improving soil structural stability to enhance soil water storage capacity and crop resistance, but long-term mono-no-till cakes the soil, reducing crop yield. Combining intensive tillage with no-till can compensate for some deficiencies arising from conventional tillage or single no-till. A three-year field experiment was conducted in wet (2020) and normal (2019 and 2021, where a drought event occurred in 2021) years to study the effect of tillage practices on summer maize productivity under different precipitation types. Treatments included conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), ridge cultivation with no-tillage (RNT), and conventional tillage of winter wheat combined with no-tillage of summer maize (NC). Compared with NT, NC and RNT significantly reduced soil bulk density and increased soil porosity in the 0–20 cm soil layer. Compared with CT, NC and RNT significantly improved aggregate stability, NC increased available soil water storage by 19.7% in the dry season (P < 0.05), and NC and RNT significantly reduced lodging rate in the rainy season. Over the three years, NC and RNT maintained higher maize yields (NC: 10.3 t ha–1 and RNT: 10.0 t ha–1) than CT (9.2 t ha–1), and NC had significantly higher yield stability than CT. Meanwhile, NC and RNT had higher precipitation use efficiency (PUE; NC: 21.2 kg ha–1 mm–1, RNT: 20.7 kg ha–1 mm–1) than NT (20.1 kg ha–1 mm–1) or CT (19.1 kg ha–1 mm–1). In terms of combined productivity, NC and RNT provide a more suitable soil environment for crop growth and maintain higher yield than NT and CT. NC rotation is recommended as the optimal tillage system for sustainable crop production under semi - arid agricultural conditions. RNT can be extended to areas prone to flooding with abundant rainfall. These results offer a benchmark for future studies on regional maize production under climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abnormal precipitation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Root growth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lodging</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Yield stability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Water use efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agricultural industries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wenquan Niu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yadan Du</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Qian Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guochun Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li Ma</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jinjin Zhu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fei Mu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dan Sun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haicheng Gan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kadambot H.M. Siddique</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sajjad Ali</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agricultural Water Management</subfield><subfield code="g">289(2023), Seite 108503-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:289</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108503-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108503</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/03e919d47ac048e7a2bce102784ee689</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423003682</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1873-2283</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">289</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">108503-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399987 |