A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West
Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Re...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi [verfasserIn] Azam Heidari [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Persisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب - University of Qom, 2024, 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:5 ; year:2018 ; number:2 ; pages:55-80 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ095837973 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ095837973 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413124034.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240413s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||per c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ095837973 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a per | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KBP1-4860 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a seyed mahdi dadmarzi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a reward | |
| 650 | 4 | |a contract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a unilateral juridical act | |
| 650 | 4 | |a common causality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a promise of reward | |
| 650 | 4 | |a unilateral contract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a unilateral promise | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Islamic law | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Azam Heidari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب |d University of Qom, 2024 |g 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 |w (DE-627)DOAJ090669606 |x 24764221 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:55-80 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 5 |j 2018 |e 2 |h 55-80 | ||
| author_variant |
s m d smd a h ah |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24764221:2018----::cmaaietdontrorwriiaiajrsrdnern |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
KBP |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095837973 (DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 seyed mahdi dadmarzi verfasserin aut A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. reward contract unilateral juridical act common causality promise of reward unilateral contract unilateral promise Islamic law Azam Heidari verfasserin aut In پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب University of Qom, 2024 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 (DE-627)DOAJ090669606 24764221 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:2 pages:55-80 https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb kostenfrei https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 5 2018 2 55-80 |
| spelling |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095837973 (DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 seyed mahdi dadmarzi verfasserin aut A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. reward contract unilateral juridical act common causality promise of reward unilateral contract unilateral promise Islamic law Azam Heidari verfasserin aut In پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب University of Qom, 2024 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 (DE-627)DOAJ090669606 24764221 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:2 pages:55-80 https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb kostenfrei https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 5 2018 2 55-80 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095837973 (DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 seyed mahdi dadmarzi verfasserin aut A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. reward contract unilateral juridical act common causality promise of reward unilateral contract unilateral promise Islamic law Azam Heidari verfasserin aut In پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب University of Qom, 2024 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 (DE-627)DOAJ090669606 24764221 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:2 pages:55-80 https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb kostenfrei https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 5 2018 2 55-80 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095837973 (DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 seyed mahdi dadmarzi verfasserin aut A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. reward contract unilateral juridical act common causality promise of reward unilateral contract unilateral promise Islamic law Azam Heidari verfasserin aut In پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب University of Qom, 2024 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 (DE-627)DOAJ090669606 24764221 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:2 pages:55-80 https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb kostenfrei https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 5 2018 2 55-80 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 doi (DE-627)DOAJ095837973 (DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per KBP1-4860 seyed mahdi dadmarzi verfasserin aut A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. reward contract unilateral juridical act common causality promise of reward unilateral contract unilateral promise Islamic law Azam Heidari verfasserin aut In پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب University of Qom, 2024 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 (DE-627)DOAJ090669606 24764221 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:2 pages:55-80 https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb kostenfrei https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 5 2018 2 55-80 |
| language |
Persian |
| source |
In پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 volume:5 year:2018 number:2 pages:55-80 |
| sourceStr |
In پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب 5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80 volume:5 year:2018 number:2 pages:55-80 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
reward contract unilateral juridical act common causality promise of reward unilateral contract unilateral promise Islamic law |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi @@aut@@ Azam Heidari @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ090669606 |
| id |
DOAJ095837973 |
| language_de |
persisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ095837973</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413124034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ095837973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KBP1-4860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">seyed mahdi dadmarzi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reward</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">contract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unilateral juridical act</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">common causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">promise of reward</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unilateral contract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unilateral promise</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Azam Heidari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Qom, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090669606</subfield><subfield code="x">24764221</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-80</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">55-80</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| author |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi |
| spellingShingle |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi misc KBP1-4860 misc reward misc contract misc unilateral juridical act misc common causality misc promise of reward misc unilateral contract misc unilateral promise misc Islamic law A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West |
| authorStr |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ090669606 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
KBP1-4860 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24764221 |
| topic_title |
KBP1-4860 A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West reward contract unilateral juridical act common causality promise of reward unilateral contract unilateral promise |
| topic |
misc KBP1-4860 misc reward misc contract misc unilateral juridical act misc common causality misc promise of reward misc unilateral contract misc unilateral promise misc Islamic law |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc KBP1-4860 misc reward misc contract misc unilateral juridical act misc common causality misc promise of reward misc unilateral contract misc unilateral promise misc Islamic law |
| topic_browse |
misc KBP1-4860 misc reward misc contract misc unilateral juridical act misc common causality misc promise of reward misc unilateral contract misc unilateral promise misc Islamic law |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ090669606 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ090669606 |
| title |
A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ095837973 (DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb |
| title_full |
A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West |
| author_sort |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi |
| journal |
پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب |
| journalStr |
پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب |
| callnumber-first-code |
K |
| lang_code |
per |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
55 |
| author_browse |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi Azam Heidari |
| container_volume |
5 |
| class |
KBP1-4860 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
seyed mahdi dadmarzi |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
comparative study of nature of reward in imamiyah jurisprudence, iranian law and law of the west |
| callnumber |
KBP1-4860 |
| title_auth |
A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West |
| abstract |
Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. |
| abstractGer |
Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213 https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Azam Heidari |
| author2Str |
Azam Heidari |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ090669606 |
| callnumber-subject |
KBP - Islamic Law |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194 |
| callnumber-a |
KBP1-4860 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:53:17.665Z |
| _version_ |
1803577561099272193 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ095837973</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413124034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ095837973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KBP1-4860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">seyed mahdi dadmarzi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Comparative Study of Nature of Reward in Imamiyah Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and Law of the West</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nature of Reward is one of the subjects on which there is disagreement in Imamiyah Jurisprudence and Law. Recognition of the legal nature of Reward is of significance in terms of the conditions of fulfillment and its consequences and rules. The purpose of this article is recognizing the nature of Reward in Imamieh Jurisprudence, Iranian law and law of the west. The Jurists and lawyers have expressed different views in this regard. In the Imamiyah Jurisprudence there is no separation between offer of reward to the public and offer of reward to the certain person and jurists have stated their opinions in general terms. In the Iranian Civil Code the nature of reward is not clearly explained and the term of obligation has been employed in an absolute way for refering to its nature. According to jurisprudential and legal analyses, it seems that reward have various external examples that can be determined in each case according to its requirements in the form of contract or unilateral juridical act or common causality. In law of the west, offer of reward to a certain person is not disputed and its nature is considered to be contractual. What is controversial is the offer of reward to the public. Some legal systems have accepted the the contractual approach and others have adopted the reward as a unilateral promise in which there is no need for acceptance and knowledge of the rewarder is not required except for the case of an explicit stipulation in the contract.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reward</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">contract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unilateral juridical act</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">common causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">promise of reward</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unilateral contract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">unilateral promise</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islamic law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Azam Heidari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Qom, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2018), 2, Seite 55-80</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090669606</subfield><subfield code="x">24764221</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:55-80</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2019.1991.1194</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a2fdc71235e8427a9eaaaab8c9f701eb</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1339_9efa70f7dd4fbddc4195cd413e88aa64.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4213</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-4221</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">55-80</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400508 |