Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review
Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which inclu...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim [verfasserIn] Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa [verfasserIn] Tarek Zayed [verfasserIn] Ghasan Alfalah [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Remote Sensing - MDPI AG, 2009, 16(2024), 2, p 385 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2024 ; number:2, p 385 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3390/rs16020385 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ096302518 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ096302518 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413150057.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240413s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rs16020385 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ096302518 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a landslide monitoring | |
| 650 | 4 | |a subsurface monitoring | |
| 650 | 4 | |a investigational monitoring | |
| 650 | 4 | |a wireless monitoring | |
| 650 | 4 | |a early warning monitoring | |
| 650 | 4 | |a real-time monitoring | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Science | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Q | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Tarek Zayed |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ghasan Alfalah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Remote Sensing |d MDPI AG, 2009 |g 16(2024), 2, p 385 |w (DE-627)608937916 |w (DE-600)2513863-7 |x 20724292 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2024 |g number:2, p 385 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4392 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2024 |e 2, p 385 | ||
| author_variant |
k m p e kmpe s m m h g smmhg t z tz g a ga |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:20724292:2024----::eethnmnlnivsiainlusraeadldmntrn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2024 |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| allfields |
10.3390/rs16020385 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096302518 (DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim verfasserin aut Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. landslide monitoring subsurface monitoring investigational monitoring wireless monitoring early warning monitoring real-time monitoring Science Q Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa verfasserin aut Tarek Zayed verfasserin aut Ghasan Alfalah verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 16(2024), 2, p 385 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:16 year:2024 number:2, p 385 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2024 2, p 385 |
| spelling |
10.3390/rs16020385 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096302518 (DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim verfasserin aut Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. landslide monitoring subsurface monitoring investigational monitoring wireless monitoring early warning monitoring real-time monitoring Science Q Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa verfasserin aut Tarek Zayed verfasserin aut Ghasan Alfalah verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 16(2024), 2, p 385 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:16 year:2024 number:2, p 385 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2024 2, p 385 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3390/rs16020385 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096302518 (DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim verfasserin aut Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. landslide monitoring subsurface monitoring investigational monitoring wireless monitoring early warning monitoring real-time monitoring Science Q Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa verfasserin aut Tarek Zayed verfasserin aut Ghasan Alfalah verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 16(2024), 2, p 385 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:16 year:2024 number:2, p 385 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2024 2, p 385 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3390/rs16020385 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096302518 (DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim verfasserin aut Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. landslide monitoring subsurface monitoring investigational monitoring wireless monitoring early warning monitoring real-time monitoring Science Q Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa verfasserin aut Tarek Zayed verfasserin aut Ghasan Alfalah verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 16(2024), 2, p 385 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:16 year:2024 number:2, p 385 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2024 2, p 385 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3390/rs16020385 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096302518 (DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim verfasserin aut Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. landslide monitoring subsurface monitoring investigational monitoring wireless monitoring early warning monitoring real-time monitoring Science Q Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa verfasserin aut Tarek Zayed verfasserin aut Ghasan Alfalah verfasserin aut In Remote Sensing MDPI AG, 2009 16(2024), 2, p 385 (DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 20724292 nnns volume:16 year:2024 number:2, p 385 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2024 2, p 385 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Remote Sensing 16(2024), 2, p 385 volume:16 year:2024 number:2, p 385 |
| sourceStr |
In Remote Sensing 16(2024), 2, p 385 volume:16 year:2024 number:2, p 385 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
landslide monitoring subsurface monitoring investigational monitoring wireless monitoring early warning monitoring real-time monitoring Science Q |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Remote Sensing |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim @@aut@@ Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa @@aut@@ Tarek Zayed @@aut@@ Ghasan Alfalah @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
608937916 |
| id |
DOAJ096302518 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ096302518</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413150057.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs16020385</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ096302518</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landslide monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">subsurface monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">investigational monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wireless monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">early warning monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">real-time monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tarek Zayed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghasan Alfalah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2024), 2, p 385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 385</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim |
| spellingShingle |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim misc landslide monitoring misc subsurface monitoring misc investigational monitoring misc wireless monitoring misc early warning monitoring misc real-time monitoring misc Science misc Q Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review |
| authorStr |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)608937916 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
20724292 |
| topic_title |
Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review landslide monitoring subsurface monitoring investigational monitoring wireless monitoring early warning monitoring real-time monitoring |
| topic |
misc landslide monitoring misc subsurface monitoring misc investigational monitoring misc wireless monitoring misc early warning monitoring misc real-time monitoring misc Science misc Q |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc landslide monitoring misc subsurface monitoring misc investigational monitoring misc wireless monitoring misc early warning monitoring misc real-time monitoring misc Science misc Q |
| topic_browse |
misc landslide monitoring misc subsurface monitoring misc investigational monitoring misc wireless monitoring misc early warning monitoring misc real-time monitoring misc Science misc Q |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Remote Sensing |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
608937916 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Remote Sensing |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)608937916 (DE-600)2513863-7 |
| title |
Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ096302518 (DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d |
| title_full |
Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review |
| author_sort |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim |
| journal |
Remote Sensing |
| journalStr |
Remote Sensing |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2024 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa Tarek Zayed Ghasan Alfalah |
| container_volume |
16 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3390/rs16020385 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
recent phenomenal and investigational subsurface landslide monitoring techniques: a mixed review |
| title_auth |
Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review |
| abstract |
Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. |
| abstractGer |
Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
2, p 385 |
| title_short |
Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385 https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa Tarek Zayed Ghasan Alfalah |
| author2Str |
Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa Tarek Zayed Ghasan Alfalah |
| ppnlink |
608937916 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3390/rs16020385 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:24:27.892Z |
| _version_ |
1803587071922667520 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ096302518</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413150057.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/rs16020385</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ096302518</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyrillos M. P. Ebrahim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Recent Phenomenal and Investigational Subsurface Landslide Monitoring Techniques: A Mixed Review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Landslides are a common and challenging geohazard that may be caused by earthquakes, rainfall, or manmade activity. Various monitoring strategies are used in order to safeguard populations at risk from landslides. This task frequently depends on the utilization of remote sensing methods, which include the observation of Earth from space, laser scanning, and ground-based interferometry. In recent years, there have been notable advancements in technologies utilized for monitoring landslides. The literature lacks a comprehensive study of subsurface monitoring systems using a mixed review approach that combines systematic and scientometric methods. In this study, scientometric and systematic analysis was used to perform a mixed review. An in-depth analysis of existing research on landslide-monitoring techniques was conducted. Surface-monitoring methods for large-scale landslides are given first. Next, local-scale landslide subsurface monitoring methods (movement, forces and stresses, water, temperature, and warning signs) were examined. Next, data-gathering techniques are shown. Finally, the physical modeling and prototype field systems are highlighted. Consequently, key findings about landslide monitoring are reviewed. While the monitoring technique selection is mainly controlled by the initial conditions of the case study, the superior monitoring technique is determined by the measurement accuracy, spatiotemporal resolution, measuring range, cost, durability, and applicability for field deployment. Finally, research suggestions are proposed, where developing a superior distributed subsurface monitoring system for wide-area monitoring is still challenging. Interpolating the complex nonlinear relationship between subsurface monitoring readings is a clear gap to overcome. Warning sign systems are still under development.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landslide monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">subsurface monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">investigational monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wireless monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">early warning monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">real-time monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Q</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sherif M. M. H. Gomaa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tarek Zayed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghasan Alfalah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Remote Sensing</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2024), 2, p 385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)608937916</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2513863-7</subfield><subfield code="x">20724292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020385</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3895cd9ad71644b1a119033f71b1007d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/385</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 385</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3991013 |