Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam

Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make the...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Suwandi [verfasserIn] Munirwansyah [verfasserIn] Yunita Halida [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Französisch

Erschienen:	2024

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: E3S Web of Conferences - EDP Sciences, 2013, 476, p 01016(2024)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:476, p 01016 ; year:2024

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ096342641

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ096342641
003	DE-627
005	20240413150505.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240413s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ096342641
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a fre
050		0	\|a GE1-350
100	0		\|a Suwandi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam
264		1	\|c 2024
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively.
653		0	\|a Environmental sciences
700	0		\|a Munirwansyah \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yunita Halida \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t E3S Web of Conferences \|d EDP Sciences, 2013 \|g 476, p 01016(2024) \|w (DE-627)778372081 \|w (DE-600)2755680-3 \|x 22671242 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:476, p 01016 \|g year:2024
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 476, p 01016 \|j 2024

Indexfelder

author_variant	s m y h yh
matchkey_str	article:22671242:2024----::oprtvaayiosiserteghtblztoopytmiotlyihun
hierarchy_sort_str	2024
callnumber-subject-code	GE
publishDate	2024
allfields	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096342641 (DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre GE1-350 Suwandi verfasserin aut Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively. Environmental sciences Munirwansyah verfasserin aut Yunita Halida verfasserin aut In E3S Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2013 476, p 01016(2024) (DE-627)778372081 (DE-600)2755680-3 22671242 nnns volume:476, p 01016 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 kostenfrei https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 476, p 01016 2024
spelling	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096342641 (DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre GE1-350 Suwandi verfasserin aut Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively. Environmental sciences Munirwansyah verfasserin aut Yunita Halida verfasserin aut In E3S Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2013 476, p 01016(2024) (DE-627)778372081 (DE-600)2755680-3 22671242 nnns volume:476, p 01016 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 kostenfrei https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 476, p 01016 2024
allfields_unstemmed	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096342641 (DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre GE1-350 Suwandi verfasserin aut Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively. Environmental sciences Munirwansyah verfasserin aut Yunita Halida verfasserin aut In E3S Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2013 476, p 01016(2024) (DE-627)778372081 (DE-600)2755680-3 22671242 nnns volume:476, p 01016 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 kostenfrei https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 476, p 01016 2024
allfieldsGer	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096342641 (DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre GE1-350 Suwandi verfasserin aut Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively. Environmental sciences Munirwansyah verfasserin aut Yunita Halida verfasserin aut In E3S Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2013 476, p 01016(2024) (DE-627)778372081 (DE-600)2755680-3 22671242 nnns volume:476, p 01016 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 kostenfrei https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 476, p 01016 2024
allfieldsSound	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096342641 (DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng fre GE1-350 Suwandi verfasserin aut Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively. Environmental sciences Munirwansyah verfasserin aut Yunita Halida verfasserin aut In E3S Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2013 476, p 01016(2024) (DE-627)778372081 (DE-600)2755680-3 22671242 nnns volume:476, p 01016 year:2024 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 kostenfrei https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 476, p 01016 2024
language	English French
source	In E3S Web of Conferences 476, p 01016(2024) volume:476, p 01016 year:2024
sourceStr	In E3S Web of Conferences 476, p 01016(2024) volume:476, p 01016 year:2024
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Environmental sciences
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	E3S Web of Conferences
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Suwandi @@aut@@ Munirwansyah @@aut@@ Yunita Halida @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	778372081
id	DOAJ096342641
language_de	englisch franzoesisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ096342641</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413150505.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ096342641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suwandi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Munirwansyah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yunita Halida</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">E3S Web of Conferences</subfield><subfield code="d">EDP Sciences, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">476, p 01016(2024)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)778372081</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2755680-3</subfield><subfield code="x">22671242</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:476, p 01016</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">476, p 01016</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	G - Geography, Anthropology, Recreation
author	Suwandi
spellingShingle	Suwandi misc GE1-350 misc Environmental sciences Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam
authorStr	Suwandi
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)778372081
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	GE1-350
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	22671242
topic_title	GE1-350 Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam
topic	misc GE1-350 misc Environmental sciences
topic_unstemmed	misc GE1-350 misc Environmental sciences
topic_browse	misc GE1-350 misc Environmental sciences
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	E3S Web of Conferences
hierarchy_parent_id	778372081
hierarchy_top_title	E3S Web of Conferences
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)778372081 (DE-600)2755680-3
title	Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ096342641 (DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2
title_full	Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam
author_sort	Suwandi
journal	E3S Web of Conferences
journalStr	E3S Web of Conferences
callnumber-first-code	G
lang_code	eng fre
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2024
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Suwandi Munirwansyah Yunita Halida
container_volume	476, p 01016
class	GE1-350
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Suwandi
doi_str_mv	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparative analysis of soil shear strength stabilization of paya tumpi soft clay with burni telong volcanic ash – wih pesam
callnumber	GE1-350
title_auth	Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam
abstract	Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively.
abstractGer	Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively.
abstract_unstemmed	Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam
url	https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016 https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2 https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242
remote_bool	true
author2	Munirwansyah Yunita Halida
author2Str	Munirwansyah Yunita Halida
ppnlink	778372081
callnumber-subject	GE - Environmental Sciences
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016
callnumber-a	GE1-350
up_date	2024-07-03T19:38:09.946Z
_version_	1803587933907714048
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ096342641</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413150505.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ096342641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suwandi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silty clay soil a quarry in Paya Tumpi, Kebayakan, West Aceh, is a source of backfill material that is often used for road construction in the area. This clay can be divided into three types based on its color, namely red, yellow, and gray. These three types of soil have bad properties that make them unsuitable for use as road base layers. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize it using a mixture of volcanic ash taken from Wih Pesam and Bener Meriah. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mixing soil with volcanic ash on the shear strength of the soil. This research method involves compaction testing with a standard proctor and direct shear strength testing on a mixture of soil and volcanic ash. Variations in the addition of volcanic ash are 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% of the dry weight of the soil. The results showed that the three soil types were included in the soil classification A-7-6 according to AASHTO, and the presence of minerals was detected in montmorillonite on gray soil. The addition of volcanic ash only increases the cohesion value of the gray soil in several variations of the mixture. The cohesion values for the various soil and volcanic ash mixtures of 0%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20% are as follows: for red soil, the cohesion values are 0.492, 0.408, 0.452, 0.088, respectively, and 0.344 in units of kg/cm2; for yellow soil, the cohesion values were 0.585, 0.562, 0.579, 0.243, and 0.327 in units of kg/cm2; while for gray soil, the cohesion values were 0.037, 0.453, 0.433, 0.206, and 0.031 in units of kg/cm2, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Munirwansyah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yunita Halida</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">E3S Web of Conferences</subfield><subfield code="d">EDP Sciences, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">476, p 01016(2024)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)778372081</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2755680-3</subfield><subfield code="x">22671242</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:476, p 01016</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601016</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/95927cdd8b5446baacb5c077f2ab3df2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/06/e3sconf_aisce2023_01016.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">476, p 01016</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4013443

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparative Analysis of Soil Shear Strength Stabilization of Paya Tumpi Soft Clay with Burni Telong Volcanic Ash – Wih Pesam

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?