CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis

Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Peipei Hu [verfasserIn] Yanze Li [verfasserIn] Xuanzhao Zhang [verfasserIn] Zhen Guo [verfasserIn] Peidong Zhang [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2018

Schlagwörter:	glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Carbon Management - Taylor & Francis Group, 2022, 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:9 ; year:2018 ; number:3 ; pages:303-310

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ096627816

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ096627816
003	DE-627
005	20240413154034.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240413s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ096627816
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a GE1-350
100	0		\|a Peipei Hu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis
264		1	\|c 2018
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels.
650		4	\|a glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction
653		0	\|a Environmental sciences
700	0		\|a Yanze Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Xuanzhao Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Zhen Guo \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Peidong Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Carbon Management \|d Taylor & Francis Group, 2022 \|g 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 \|w (DE-627)644741066 \|w (DE-600)2590249-0 \|x 17583012 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:9 \|g year:2018 \|g number:3 \|g pages:303-310
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 9 \|j 2018 \|e 3 \|h 303-310

Indexfelder

author_variant	p h ph y l yl x z xz z g zg p z pz
matchkey_str	article:17583012:2018----::oeisofocnanrlsicianeisordci
hierarchy_sort_str	2018
callnumber-subject-code	GE
publishDate	2018
allfields	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096627816 (DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng GE1-350 Peipei Hu verfasserin aut CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels. glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction Environmental sciences Yanze Li verfasserin aut Xuanzhao Zhang verfasserin aut Zhen Guo verfasserin aut Peidong Zhang verfasserin aut In Carbon Management Taylor & Francis Group, 2022 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 (DE-627)644741066 (DE-600)2590249-0 17583012 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:3 pages:303-310 https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 3 303-310
spelling	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096627816 (DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng GE1-350 Peipei Hu verfasserin aut CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels. glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction Environmental sciences Yanze Li verfasserin aut Xuanzhao Zhang verfasserin aut Zhen Guo verfasserin aut Peidong Zhang verfasserin aut In Carbon Management Taylor & Francis Group, 2022 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 (DE-627)644741066 (DE-600)2590249-0 17583012 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:3 pages:303-310 https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 3 303-310
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096627816 (DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng GE1-350 Peipei Hu verfasserin aut CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels. glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction Environmental sciences Yanze Li verfasserin aut Xuanzhao Zhang verfasserin aut Zhen Guo verfasserin aut Peidong Zhang verfasserin aut In Carbon Management Taylor & Francis Group, 2022 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 (DE-627)644741066 (DE-600)2590249-0 17583012 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:3 pages:303-310 https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 3 303-310
allfieldsGer	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096627816 (DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng GE1-350 Peipei Hu verfasserin aut CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels. glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction Environmental sciences Yanze Li verfasserin aut Xuanzhao Zhang verfasserin aut Zhen Guo verfasserin aut Peidong Zhang verfasserin aut In Carbon Management Taylor & Francis Group, 2022 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 (DE-627)644741066 (DE-600)2590249-0 17583012 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:3 pages:303-310 https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 3 303-310
allfieldsSound	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 doi (DE-627)DOAJ096627816 (DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng GE1-350 Peipei Hu verfasserin aut CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels. glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction Environmental sciences Yanze Li verfasserin aut Xuanzhao Zhang verfasserin aut Zhen Guo verfasserin aut Peidong Zhang verfasserin aut In Carbon Management Taylor & Francis Group, 2022 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 (DE-627)644741066 (DE-600)2590249-0 17583012 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:3 pages:303-310 https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 3 303-310
language	English
source	In Carbon Management 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 volume:9 year:2018 number:3 pages:303-310
sourceStr	In Carbon Management 9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310 volume:9 year:2018 number:3 pages:303-310
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction Environmental sciences
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Carbon Management
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Peipei Hu @@aut@@ Yanze Li @@aut@@ Xuanzhao Zhang @@aut@@ Zhen Guo @@aut@@ Peidong Zhang @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	644741066
id	DOAJ096627816
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ096627816</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413154034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ096627816</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peipei Hu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanze Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xuanzhao Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhen Guo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peidong Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Carbon Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Taylor & Francis Group, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)644741066</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2590249-0</subfield><subfield code="x">17583012</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:303-310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">303-310</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	G - Geography, Anthropology, Recreation
author	Peipei Hu
spellingShingle	Peipei Hu misc GE1-350 misc glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction misc Environmental sciences CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis
authorStr	Peipei Hu
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)644741066
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	GE1-350
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	17583012
topic_title	GE1-350 CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction
topic	misc GE1-350 misc glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction misc Environmental sciences
topic_unstemmed	misc GE1-350 misc glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction misc Environmental sciences
topic_browse	misc GE1-350 misc glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction misc Environmental sciences
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Carbon Management
hierarchy_parent_id	644741066
hierarchy_top_title	Carbon Management
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)644741066 (DE-600)2590249-0
title	CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ096627816 (DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65
title_full	CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis
author_sort	Peipei Hu
journal	Carbon Management
journalStr	Carbon Management
callnumber-first-code	G
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2018
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	303
author_browse	Peipei Hu Yanze Li Xuanzhao Zhang Zhen Guo Peidong Zhang
container_volume	9
class	GE1-350
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Peipei Hu
doi_str_mv	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	co2 emission from container glass in china, and emission reduction strategy analysis
callnumber	GE1-350
title_auth	CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis
abstract	Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels.
abstractGer	Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels.
abstract_unstemmed	Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis
url	https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929 https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004 https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012
remote_bool	true
author2	Yanze Li Xuanzhao Zhang Zhen Guo Peidong Zhang
author2Str	Yanze Li Xuanzhao Zhang Zhen Guo Peidong Zhang
ppnlink	644741066
callnumber-subject	GE - Environmental Sciences
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929
callnumber-a	GE1-350
up_date	2024-07-03T21:13:49.676Z
_version_	1803593952452935680
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ096627816</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413154034.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ096627816</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE1-350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peipei Hu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Glass is one of the materials most extensively used for packaging. Its manufacturing process is typically energy intensive, with a large quantity of CO2 emissions. In this study, the material and energy consumptioninventory of the manufacturing stage were quantified and CO2 emissions from the glass manufacturing process were calculated. When fuel oil, coal or natural gas is used as the major energy source in the production system, it produces CO2 emissions of 1.2798, 0.6250 and 0.4498 t/t, respectively. CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion account for 67.79% of the total emissions and a huge potential exists for emission reduction. Due to differences in energy structure, current research results cannot represent the emissions in China; therefore, six scenarios were created to explore the CO2 emission reduction potential of the glass industry with different energy structures, and six scenarios were created to explore the cost from the adjustment of the energy structure. According to the analysis of the glass furnace, the effective heat accounts for 35.31%, so the basic approach for energy saving and emission reduction is to enhance the effective heat quantity of the glass furnace. Also, energy and virgin feedstock savings were calculated for 1 t of glass container production with different recycling levels.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">glass container industry; carbon dioxide (co2) emissions accounting; energy saving-emission reduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Environmental sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yanze Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xuanzhao Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhen Guo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peidong Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Carbon Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Taylor & Francis Group, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2018), 3, Seite 303-310</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)644741066</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2590249-0</subfield><subfield code="x">17583012</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:303-310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b46a925d66e74c71ba51d3f89f417a65</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1457929</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3004</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3012</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">303-310</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4001417

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

CO2 emission from container glass in China, and emission reduction strategy analysis

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?